The United SpongeBob Forums

Off Topic => Everything Else => Debate Den => Topic started by: williambob286 on November 11, 2005, 02:57:54 pm

Title: Which world?
Post by: williambob286 on November 11, 2005, 02:57:54 pm
Which world you choose to live in? The old times, or today.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Elizabeth Rose on November 11, 2005, 03:44:55 pm
Old times without a doubt.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Dragon Of Grief on November 11, 2005, 03:55:10 pm
I like the world today... it is every day getting better and better in... in certain ways of course.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Spongey4 on November 11, 2005, 04:18:45 pm
Today..it has better things like TV and Comps (DUh)
Title: Which world?
Post by: Patback399 on November 11, 2005, 05:04:30 pm
The old days. There was more love. Now, if you say you love a guy, you're considered gay. That shouldn't be the case. You should love everyone. You won't be gay you would be a good person. Even in today's culture, there's negative views. Back in the old days (I'm talking 50s - 70s), no songs said, "Go screw your brother" or anything like that. It was a much better time. You could just relax. I don't care if there was no technology. For what does it profit a man if he shall gain the world but lose his soul?
Title: Which world?
Post by: cmonkey on November 11, 2005, 05:54:50 pm
Today's world, definately.  We've never before gotten this close to having a world in which basic human rights and needs were met for all, not just the rich or the strong.  Of course, that statement has been slightly strained for America since the election of 2000, but for the world as a whole, it's been offset by amazing progress in eastern Europe, parts of Asia, and many African countries.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Thomas on November 12, 2005, 07:51:39 am
It's too hard to choose...we have better stuff in this time...but in the old days, people showed more respect and there was more love and care....today it's all wrong.
So...I can't really choose.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Megan on November 12, 2005, 08:11:00 am
I agree with CMonkey, 50 years ago, there was horrible discrimination against anyone who wasn't a white man. I couldn't imagine being around all that hatred and violence. Yeah, there's hatred and violence today, but, It's mostly stuff that people get their own selves into.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Daniel on November 12, 2005, 08:40:21 am
My mom said the "discrimination" wasn't as bad as it was made out to be. Then again, that could have just been where she lived.

Anywho, I would live in the old times.
Title: Which world?
Post by: edso on November 12, 2005, 11:15:11 am
Hmm..

Old times 60s and 80s own your soul.
Title: Which world?
Post by: SizzlinSean on November 12, 2005, 11:56:18 am
I could easily live without technology (excluding my spectacular cell phone), but I prefer the mentality of my time better. So I pick now.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Isnt Anything on November 12, 2005, 01:26:42 pm
Back in the 40's or 50's. The music was better. I could live without the internet and a cell phone. The only thing I'd change is the human rights. But for the most part. The 40's and 50's.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Fifth Dynasty on November 12, 2005, 01:29:35 pm
I'd love to live in the 20s through the 40s. Everything seemed perfect then (it wasn't, but it seemed so). But I really do love todays world. Without an instant messenger I wouldn't have any friends...
Title: Which world?
Post by: ernest310 on November 15, 2005, 10:42:04 am
I admit I was getting a bit upset, as I usually do when folks wax nostalgic over the "good old days," until I saw Megan's post (to which I said "thank you, thank you, thank you!!!")

I'll say this again later, but I don't blame anyone for believing the "old days" to be fundamentally better than today.  I'm going to disagree, yes, but I don't blame anyone for their perspectives (I'm not on anyone's case here--I'm upset at the content of the comments, not the individuals who made them.)  Let me explain what I mean:

To say that "everything seemed perfect then" (Fifth Dynasty) is to exhibit a profound amnesia about the violent history of the United States against people of color.  Sure, the "old days" were a time in which you could "relax" (Patback)--but only if you were white (and a white man in particular.)

Again, I'm not blaming anyone here.  Why?  Because I believe the blame lies squarely with our school education.  I mean, how do you tell children, especially young ones, that Thomas Jefferson, the man who wrote "All men are created equal," owned nearly 200 black slaves at the same time?  We end up becoming profoundly unaware of this country's history--and this is what leads us to believe that the "old days" were necessarily better.  We're given a watered-down version of US history that insulates us from some of the not-so-admirable actions white people have taken against people of color in the name of freedom and democracy--such as removing Native Americans from their land, killing off 90% of them through (mainly) disease and acts of violence, and sticking the rest on reservations, effectively violating every treaty the (white) US government made with them.  From a Native American point of view, the old days are hardly "perfect."

One can say that people "showed more respect and there was more love and care" in the old days, but it was only white people doing that--to each other, not to black people.  Prior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, white kids--especially in the South, but not just there--were socialized to consider blacks inferior.  They wouldn't be allowed to play with black kids and were taught to disrespect them.  That was the culture of the time.
Title: Which world?
Post by: garyfan on November 15, 2005, 12:34:42 pm
Today, it kicks ::Dolphin Noise::.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Thomas on November 16, 2005, 12:05:50 am
I want to live in the Ice Age years. :)
Title: Which world?
Post by: williambob286 on November 16, 2005, 12:06:43 am
Quote
I admit I was getting a bit upset, as I usually do when folks wax nostalgic over the "good old days," until I saw Megan's post (to which I said "thank you, thank you, thank you!!!")

I'll say this again later, but I don't blame anyone for believing the "old days" to be fundamentally better than today.  I'm going to disagree, yes, but I don't blame anyone for their perspectives (I'm not on anyone's case here--I'm upset at the content of the comments, not the individuals who made them.)  Let me explain what I mean:

To say that "everything seemed perfect then" (Fifth Dynasty) is to exhibit a profound amnesia about the violent history of the United States against people of color.  Sure, the "old days" were a time in which you could "relax" (Patback)--but only if you were white (and a white man in particular.)

Again, I'm not blaming anyone here.  Why?  Because I believe the blame lies squarely with our school education.  I mean, how do you tell children, especially young ones, that Thomas Jefferson, the man who wrote "All men are created equal," owned nearly 200 black slaves at the same time?  We end up becoming profoundly unaware of this country's history--and this is what leads us to believe that the "old days" were necessarily better.  We're given a watered-down version of US history that insulates us from some of the not-so-admirable actions white people have taken against people of color in the name of freedom and democracy--such as removing Native Americans from their land, killing off 90% of them through (mainly) disease and acts of violence, and sticking the rest on reservations, effectively violating every treaty the (white) US government made with them.  From a Native American point of view, the old days are hardly "perfect."

One can say that people "showed more respect and there was more love and care" in the old days, but it was only white people doing that--to each other, not to black people.  Prior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, white kids--especially in the South, but not just there--were socialized to consider blacks inferior.  They wouldn't be allowed to play with black kids and were taught to disrespect them.  That was the culture of the time.
[snapback]254248[/snapback]

That was, good?

I prefer the old times. My Social Studies teacher said some of his friends drank the rain when it was in the old times. I wanna play in the rain and don't get sick. Meh, so much killing now.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Spongey4 on November 22, 2005, 10:48:25 am
today.Because did you know in the 1770s kids had to WORK.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Dragon Of Grief on November 22, 2005, 11:10:49 am
Quote
today.Because did you know in the 1770s kids had to WORK.
[snapback]255908[/snapback]
REALLY! OMG I DIDN'T KNOW THAT :rolleyes:


Anyways I think the New World times would be an interesting era to visit myself. When everything was starting to get settled... and when our white ancestors raped the Indian's land, stole their crops, and forced them onto tiny reservations... YAY HISTORY :biggrin:
Title: Which world?
Post by: Isnt Anything on November 22, 2005, 07:44:28 pm
Quote
I admit I was getting a bit upset, as I usually do when folks wax nostalgic over the "good old days," until I saw Megan's post (to which I said "thank you, thank you, thank you!!!")

I'll say this again later, but I don't blame anyone for believing the "old days" to be fundamentally better than today.  I'm going to disagree, yes, but I don't blame anyone for their perspectives (I'm not on anyone's case here--I'm upset at the content of the comments, not the individuals who made them.)  Let me explain what I mean:

To say that "everything seemed perfect then" (Fifth Dynasty) is to exhibit a profound amnesia about the violent history of the United States against people of color.  Sure, the "old days" were a time in which you could "relax" (Patback)--but only if you were white (and a white man in particular.)

Again, I'm not blaming anyone here.  Why?  Because I believe the blame lies squarely with our school education.  I mean, how do you tell children, especially young ones, that Thomas Jefferson, the man who wrote "All men are created equal," owned nearly 200 black slaves at the same time?  We end up becoming profoundly unaware of this country's history--and this is what leads us to believe that the "old days" were necessarily better.  We're given a watered-down version of US history that insulates us from some of the not-so-admirable actions white people have taken against people of color in the name of freedom and democracy--such as removing Native Americans from their land, killing off 90% of them through (mainly) disease and acts of violence, and sticking the rest on reservations, effectively violating every treaty the (white) US government made with them.  From a Native American point of view, the old days are hardly "perfect."

One can say that people "showed more respect and there was more love and care" in the old days, but it was only white people doing that--to each other, not to black people.  Prior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, white kids--especially in the South, but not just there--were socialized to consider blacks inferior.  They wouldn't be allowed to play with black kids and were taught to disrespect them.  That was the culture of the time.
[snapback]254248[/snapback]

I'm sorry that your comment is being ignored. I agree, however, Its not entirely the Schools falt. The media and hollywood make the '50's to be a picture of pleasntville (the movie) or "Leave it to Beaver". Nothing ever went wrong and every day was ended happily. Lets not forget the sugarcoated language and yes, the racism. Things of today existed them. Like homosexuality, racism, domestic violence and drugs. The difference between then and now (civil rights movement aside) is that issues like that were in the backround and well hidden "behind closed doors" so-to-speak. Now, all of this is right in front of you and ready for you to examine and make an opinion. A lot more awareness in things like abuse and more avenues to deal with it...
Title: Which world?
Post by: Daniel on November 22, 2005, 07:52:03 pm
Quote
today.Because did you know in the 1770s kids had to WORK.
[snapback]255908[/snapback]
Oh yup, you would have a heart attack if you got off your butt and worked.
Title: Which world?
Post by: IceFox on November 22, 2005, 07:55:07 pm
Quote
Quote
today.Because did you know in the 1770s kids had to WORK.
[snapback]255908[/snapback]
Oh yup, you would have a heart attack if you got off your butt and worked.
[snapback]256198[/snapback]
Uhm. They lacked child labor laws. You hate school, right? Well most kids then wanted to go to school. It was either that or work in the fields all day, all night.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Daniel on November 22, 2005, 08:01:18 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
today.Because did you know in the 1770s kids had to WORK.
[snapback]255908[/snapback]
Oh yup, you would have a heart attack if you got off your butt and worked.
[snapback]256198[/snapback]
Uhm. They lacked child labor laws. You hate school, right? Well most kids then wanted to go to school. It was either that or work in the fields all day, all night.
[snapback]256200[/snapback]
Oh, THAT work. I thought you meant like normal yard work and stuff. My bad.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Patback399 on November 23, 2005, 06:12:09 am
Quote
Quote
I admit I was getting a bit upset, as I usually do when folks wax nostalgic over the "good old days," until I saw Megan's post (to which I said "thank you, thank you, thank you!!!")

I'll say this again later, but I don't blame anyone for believing the "old days" to be fundamentally better than today.  I'm going to disagree, yes, but I don't blame anyone for their perspectives (I'm not on anyone's case here--I'm upset at the content of the comments, not the individuals who made them.)  Let me explain what I mean:

To say that "everything seemed perfect then" (Fifth Dynasty) is to exhibit a profound amnesia about the violent history of the United States against people of color.  Sure, the "old days" were a time in which you could "relax" (Patback)--but only if you were white (and a white man in particular.)

Again, I'm not blaming anyone here.  Why?  Because I believe the blame lies squarely with our school education.  I mean, how do you tell children, especially young ones, that Thomas Jefferson, the man who wrote "All men are created equal," owned nearly 200 black slaves at the same time?  We end up becoming profoundly unaware of this country's history--and this is what leads us to believe that the "old days" were necessarily better.  We're given a watered-down version of US history that insulates us from some of the not-so-admirable actions white people have taken against people of color in the name of freedom and democracy--such as removing Native Americans from their land, killing off 90% of them through (mainly) disease and acts of violence, and sticking the rest on reservations, effectively violating every treaty the (white) US government made with them.  From a Native American point of view, the old days are hardly "perfect."

One can say that people "showed more respect and there was more love and care" in the old days, but it was only white people doing that--to each other, not to black people.  Prior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, white kids--especially in the South, but not just there--were socialized to consider blacks inferior.  They wouldn't be allowed to play with black kids and were taught to disrespect them.  That was the culture of the time.
[snapback]254248[/snapback]

I'm sorry that your comment is being ignored. I agree, however, Its not entirely the Schools falt. The media and hollywood make the '50's to be a picture of pleasntville (the movie) or "Leave it to Beaver". Nothing ever went wrong and every day was ended happily. Lets not forget the sugarcoated language and yes, the racism. Things of today existed them. Like homosexuality, racism, domestic violence and drugs. The difference between then and now (civil rights movement aside) is that issues like that were in the backround and well hidden "behind closed doors" so-to-speak. Now, all of this is right in front of you and ready for you to examine and make an opinion. A lot more awareness in things like abuse and more avenues to deal with it...
[snapback]256193[/snapback]

Maybe I should have put more thought into my post. Ernest310 and Isnt Anything, I think you are  both great thinkers and state your views very thouroughly. Good job.

As I have said, I should have thought through my opinion a little more. I now understand there is no time where you everyone can "relax". There will always be a problem in the world. There will always be people who can't just stand back and let nature take its course.
Title: Which world?
Post by: spongemonkey13 on November 23, 2005, 06:18:59 am
By old times I mean the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, or 90s. I love those times.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Spongey4 on November 23, 2005, 07:58:35 am
Today,It has the best inventions:TV,Computer,Video games.
Title: Which world?
Post by: Daniel on November 23, 2005, 09:47:53 am
They had TV back in the 40's. So it really isn't modern. And, computers and video games came out in the 80's. They aren't really modern either. But, Anywho, I would rather live in the 50's.
Title: Which world?
Post by: spongey snail on November 24, 2005, 06:19:52 pm
I like from 1997 to 2002 really.but all the old stuff is awsome with me being a retro geek
Title: Which world?
Post by: Patback399 on November 25, 2005, 09:20:36 am
I think it would be nice to turn on the radio and there always being something you like on.
Title: Which world?
Post by: maxmyles on November 25, 2005, 09:59:19 am
depends on what you mean. if you mean time, then i'd love to live in the hippy ages. xD
Title: Which world?
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 25, 2005, 01:08:21 pm
I'd like to get to know both worlds a little bit more.

I want to know what it was like to live in the old world. I have no idea why, but I've always been fascinated with what people USED to live like.

I'd like to get to know more of this world as well because there are a lot of things I haven't experienced and I probably never will if I just live in the same 2 towns for years to come. Maybe a certain Lynn will come to TX and we could get married and move back to Canada. :laugh:
Title: Which world?
Post by: Gideon Brown on November 25, 2005, 01:13:01 pm
Maybe...one day...:P