The United SpongeBob Forums

Off Topic => Computers & Video Games => Topic started by: Rocko on March 14, 2004, 03:59:41 pm

Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 14, 2004, 03:59:41 pm
This therd is for the eternal Mac vs. PeeCee debate. Each platform fanboy will post their oppions on each system. It needs to me more then the Macs Suxx, or PeeCee's are for geeks. YOu need to back-up your opion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 14, 2004, 04:02:39 pm
Ok, first off, its not PeeCee. Its PC. It stands for Personal Computer.

Well, I hate macintosh computers. They suck, and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple. And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Jashani on March 14, 2004, 04:04:41 pm
A computer is a computer. It dosent matter which one you have.

This concludes my stateing argument.

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spider-Boogie on March 14, 2004, 04:08:46 pm
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on March 14, 2004, 04:29:38 pm
I don't like Macs because Apple is the only company that makes them.  There is no competition so prices stay way too high.  Windows isn't great, but with it you can at least build your own computer cheaply.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 14, 2004, 05:56:20 pm
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death, with this: 0957890-23450-89234759034278590123475890-47305897234890-5734289673458906790345867890346789257589342657823465789234569823476589234765890237465890234678905237489572389056789023569082346589034657ugh67589324326758923465983689576348925672890056923480568902347589406895675896597823465293805629306589034659236905826739058623894562348905623490856289056389056890236529034856892346589342659082465896234905862348956723890467538925690234865893425678923465978236490523890456238905689023659082346578923468905265490856498032689567892658923569824562893056234895624390625892346543892568902468923465986243095624905649238562934806598234659023456623458923465896234589623494567890345342567983624589634980563479056936824592346597824654293756324657234652783458579349658753456837246578256234875653428675467845367823456587265478234568975678356754678455766756234678565478657846378452658726578562385283465685672367856.  That's a peecee eorror code.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 14, 2004, 06:04:48 pm
My moms PC never crashed after we got rid of Windows ME. And Macs are WAYY more expensive.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 14, 2004, 06:31:03 pm
YOu try getting a dual-processer,  64-bit CPU computer with a DVD-Burner for under; $2,999.00.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 14, 2004, 06:51:28 pm
Um, you could. My dad got his opteron for $500. So:

$500+$500+200=1200
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on March 14, 2004, 06:56:46 pm
Yea,  :tongue: .  A dual opteron rig can be built for under three grand fairly easily.  I won't disagree with the fact that Windows machines are unstable, but they are more stable than they used to be.  I once had over 4 weeks of uptime on this Windows XP Pro box.  I never get blue screens of death unless I'm overclocking.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on March 14, 2004, 07:09:41 pm
PCs are WAY better. Mines only been up for like 1 month and I love it. The Mac has had at least 1 error, everyday for the past 2 weeks. Thursday I had to restart it 5 times in an hour because one program kept quiting itself and then it said I had to restart the computer. I pressed to restart and it froze. If I ever go to the Grand Canyon, I'm taking the Mac with me and throwing it over. That a good enough argument Rocko?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spider-Boogie on March 15, 2004, 07:40:46 am
Quote
PCs are WAY better. Mines only been up for like 1 month and I love it. The Mac has had at least 1 error, everyday for the past 2 weeks. Thursday I had to restart it 5 times in an hour because one program kept quiting itself and then it said I had to restart the computer. I pressed to restart and it froze. If I ever go to the Grand Canyon, I'm taking the Mac with me and throwing it over. That a good enough argument Rocko?
The Mac has probably had an average of about 3-5 errors a day.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Hannahbal on March 15, 2004, 08:24:35 am
Quote
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death
Oh Mah Gawd, only 5 TIMES in 2 YEARS?!

We got ours 2 years ago and it's never crashed. It's a PC.

Booya Grandma.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 15, 2004, 12:08:52 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death
Oh Mah Gawd, only 5 TIMES in 2 YEARS?!

We got ours 2 years ago and it's never crashed. It's a PC.

Booya Grandma.
I cant even remember the last time I got a blue screen. Although I did get freaked out today during computers when the computer turned all gray screeny.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 15, 2004, 01:14:29 pm
Quote
PCs are WAY better. Mines only been up for like 1 month and I love it. The Mac has had at least 1 error, everyday for the past 2 weeks. Thursday I had to restart it 5 times in an hour because one program kept quiting itself and then it said I had to restart the computer. I pressed to restart and it froze. If I ever go to the Grand Canyon, I'm taking the Mac with me and throwing it over. That a good enough argument Rocko?
If you have a G3 and at least 16mb, of vram, update to Mac OS X.It never crash's, sure sometimes you have to force-quit a program. But that's only when it's run out of  memory, and viturl mermory. It's so stable, and don't worry about kornel panic's I have yet to have one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongemonkey13 on March 15, 2004, 03:12:18 pm
i think i have a pc. haha. that shows how little i know about computers.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 15, 2004, 03:15:51 pm
PCs are anything except Macintosh computers. So unless you own an apple, you have a PC. Everything with Windows is PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on March 15, 2004, 03:36:07 pm
You're forgetting about Linux.  Computers running Linux are generally not referred to as PCs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on March 15, 2004, 03:59:49 pm
Quote
You're forgetting about Linux.  Computers running Linux are generally not referred to as PCs.
They aren't? Wow. You learn something new each day. Still, I bet a vast majority of members here are Windows users. I'm not saying there aren't Linux users.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongestacey-whezers on April 01, 2004, 04:01:49 am
For PCs:

You can run the vast majority of games on these babies!
You get Solitaire!  
You can PrintScreen
You can right click things!

Against PCs:

- They're more vulnerable to viruses
- Crashes (ie. blue screen of death) look creepier

For Macs:

- The skins on applications look much more fancier
- The keyboards feel nicer
- iTunes!

Against Macs:

- There's no print screen
- There's no right-click button :(
- Some things on the Internet don't display properly

                   
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 01, 2004, 08:58:03 am
Their are Thousands of virus on PCs, but only  about 50 or so for Macs. Here's a plus for the Mac: Eaiser to set-up. TO set up an iMac you just connect the keyboard, mouse, and speakkers, plug you modem in, plug the computer in, and start it up. And then you enter your name and email. Thats it! And Macs dominate the "creative feilds". Most magiznes are made on P.C.'s even P.C. Magiznes are. Alot of music  editing is done on the Mac, and video editing too.
As for Right click butten, you can simply buy a 2 butten mouse. I have one for my Mac, and it's nice. Even if you have a 1 boutten mouse you can still control click, and get the same funciton as a right click.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on April 01, 2004, 09:49:40 am
Quote
Their are Thousands of virus on PCs, but only  about 50 or so for Macs. Here's a plus for the Mac: Eaiser to set-up. TO set up an iMac you just connect the keyboard, mouse, and speakkers, plug you modem in, plug the computer in, and start it up. And then you enter your name and email. Thats it! And Macs dominate the "creative feilds". Most magiznes are made on P.C.'s even P.C. Magiznes are. Alot of music  editing is done on the Mac, and video editing too.
As for Right click butten, you can simply buy a 2 butten mouse. I have one for my Mac, and it's nice. Even if you have a 1 boutten mouse you can still control click, and get the same funciton as a right click.
Um, new PCs have a video editing system. My computer has an anti-virus system on it. Oh, and Macs makeup for not having many viruses, with have a ton of errors, closing programs, freezing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on April 01, 2004, 03:07:37 pm
Quote
For PCs:

You can run the vast majority of games on these babies!
You get Solitaire!  
You can PrintScreen
You can right click things!

Against PCs:

- They're more vulnerable to viruses
- Crashes (ie. blue screen of death) look creepier

For Macs:

- The skins on applications look much more fancier
- The keyboards feel nicer
- iTunes!

Against Macs:

- There's no print screen
- There's no right-click button :(
- Some things on the Internet don't display properly
On a G5 you can right click and I havent had a problem with my Dad's ridicously tricked out G5. About the internet, it always works for me. The only problems are on my mom's Dell Dimension 4500. I'm writing this message on the Dell and the keyboard is loud and hurts my fingers. My dad uses a Macally keyboard its quiet and comfortable. One thing good about my mom's Dell is that the YIM rocks at version 5.6 and my dad's YIM is 2.5.3 and its no good. No IMViroments, no cool fonts and no color customizing blows.
On crashes, i've had some crashes on this Dell here and I couldn't sleep the night I had the virus. It was all like, all of a sudden,74365678123674267164328578936517 or something and I started to run. And with the Mac, it has no 74365678123674267164328578936517. Of course, I never had a problem with G5 down at my Dad's so I wouldn't know.




          Overall, Mac gets a 5 out of 5.


          Overall, Posessed Dell gets 2.5 out of 5.


             This is my longest post ever. 1036 characters!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on April 01, 2004, 03:25:00 pm
Ok, let me do MY comparison.

PC: Games come standard.
Mac: The only games I can play are on the internet.

PC: Mine has a 68.0 GB hard drive
Mac: The Mac has a puny 6.44 GB hard drive

PC: The internet's fine, except for when the provider is having problems.
Mac: It really does slow down the internet. I've compared for the two computers and the Macs internet is MUCH slower.

PC: The only error that's ever happend on the PC was because of a website I was visiting.
Mac: Has multiple errors in a day.

PC: My PC has a DVD drive, CD drive and Floppy disk drive. It also has 6 USB ports.
Mac: My Mac has a CD drive. It also has 2 USB ports. One's already taken by the keyboard.

PC: A bit complicated to setup, but once it's up, it runs fine.
Mac: Easy to setup, but once it's setup, it's slow.

PC: When you make a paint file, it can be put into Jpg format, Gif format, Tiff format, PNG format and 4 different forms of Bitmap. Some of which can be put on the internet.
Mac: When you make a paint file, it can only be put in Apple Works format, which cannot be put on the internet.


I think that's about all I need to say.  :mellow:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on April 01, 2004, 03:41:31 pm
Ok, none of you are being unbiased.  OS for OS, Mac OS X appears to be more stable than Windows XP Pro.  As far as security, Windows is most exploited because so many people use it.  If OS X was used that much, more people would find exploits for it.  Speed really depends on the individual computer.  You can't compare a dual G5 to a PIII 900, and you can't compare a dual FX-53 to an iMac.  The real comparison would be price for price.  Linux defeats all in that competition because, well, its free.  Custom built Windows computers have a better price/performance ratio than Apples do though.  If you have the cash for either, its just personal preference. If you're a gamer, you'll obviously want Windows XP Pro.  If you're a video/graphics guru, an Apple might be a good choice, altough there are many good programs for Windows.  If you are using it for only web browsing, etc, then either works.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 01, 2004, 05:33:49 pm
Quote
Ok, let me do MY comparison.

PC: Games come standard.
Mac: The only games I can play are on the internet.

PC: Mine has a 68.0 GB hard drive
Mac: The Mac has a puny 6.44 GB hard drive

PC: The internet's fine, except for when the provider is having problems.
Mac: It really does slow down the internet. I've compared for the two computers and the Macs internet is MUCH slower.

PC: The only error that's ever happend on the PC was because of a website I was visiting.
Mac: Has multiple errors in a day.

PC: My PC has a DVD drive, CD drive and Floppy disk drive. It also has 6 USB ports.
Mac: My Mac has a CD drive. It also has 2 USB ports. One's already taken by the keyboard.

PC: A bit complicated to setup, but once it's up, it runs fine.
Mac: Easy to setup, but once it's setup, it's slow.

PC: When you make a paint file, it can be put into Jpg format, Gif format, Tiff format, PNG format and 4 different forms of Bitmap. Some of which can be put on the internet.
Mac: When you make a paint file, it can only be put in Apple Works format, which cannot be put on the internet.


I think that's about all I need to say.  :mellow:
UNfair comparison, you are comapirng a 4 year old iMac to a new PC. That's infair, and in Apple Works you can change the format to a GIF or JPEG. Mac OS X is much faster anyway, if your computer can handle it. XP can be really slow too. Try running XP on a 900mhz PIII sometime.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: sponge2704 on April 05, 2004, 08:06:57 pm
PC.the PCs are just better and have a much better system for the internet. And someone said iTunes,but Dell Music Match is alot better
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 01, 2004, 07:45:21 pm
PCs:
-Give me nightmares.

Macs:
-Nothing rivals it's superiority.
-I've used Macs for 8 years.  Not once has it "crashed."
-No system pop-ups.
-The fastest internet browser out there. (http://www.apple.com/safari/)
-Movie editing and DVD burning apps bundled in. (http://www.apple.com/ilife/)
-Mac OS X has been acclaimed as the safest OS in the world.
-Mac users never give viruses a thought. They don't bother us.
-All of Apple's computers are so much better than any Dell or HP crap.
-If it weren't for the Macintosh, there wouldn't be any "Windows."  Microsoft got all its GUI (Graphical User Interface) ideas from Apple (http://www.apple.com/).
-Anyone who is not using a Mac is seriously missing out.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 01, 2004, 08:11:09 pm
Dude. Don't post on ancient topics.
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 01, 2004, 08:26:11 pm
Quote
Dude. Don't post on ancient topics.
Sean that was a good post, i gotta say.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 01, 2004, 09:10:47 pm
Thanks, PatrickStarr2k3.  And does it really matter if they're a few weeks old?  I mean, now it's not, so...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 01, 2004, 09:14:50 pm
Quote
PCs:
-Give me nightmares.

Macs:
-Nothing rivals it's superiority.
-I've used Macs for 8 years.  Not once has it "crashed."
-No system pop-ups.
-The fastest internet browser out there. (http://www.apple.com/safari/)
-Movie editing and DVD burning apps bundled in. (http://www.apple.com/ilife/)
-Mac OS X has been acclaimed as the safest OS in the world.
-Mac users never give viruses a thought. They don't bother us.
-All of Apple's computers are so much better than any Dell or HP crap.
-If it weren't for the Macintosh, there wouldn't be any "Windows."  Microsoft got all its GUI (Graphical User Interface) ideas from Apple (http://www.apple.com/).
-Anyone who is not using a Mac is seriously missing out.
Parade for Spongey34!!!!! Mac r00lz!!! w00t w00t w00t!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 01, 2004, 09:50:42 pm
Quote
Quote
PCs:
-Give me nightmares.

Macs:
-Nothing rivals it's superiority.
-I've used Macs for 8 years.  Not once has it "crashed."
-No system pop-ups.
-The fastest internet browser out there. (http://www.apple.com/safari/)
-Movie editing and DVD burning apps bundled in. (http://www.apple.com/ilife/)
-Mac OS X has been acclaimed as the safest OS in the world.
-Mac users never give viruses a thought. They don't bother us.
-All of Apple's computers are so much better than any Dell or HP crap.
-If it weren't for the Macintosh, there wouldn't be any "Windows."  Microsoft got all its GUI (Graphical User Interface) ideas from Apple (http://www.apple.com/).
-Anyone who is not using a Mac is seriously missing out.
Parade for Spongey34!!!!! Mac r00lz!!! w00t w00t w00t!!!
1.  Purely opinion.  No fact to back it up.
2.  Macs crash.  In the short amounts of time that I've used them, I've seen them crash.
3.  I disabled most system pop-ups in Windows.
4.  Fast does not equal compatible.  It has trouble with many pages.
5.  Agreed.  The multimedia apps are great.
6.  It is safe, but only because nobody write viruses or bothers to find exploits for it.  That's because its not worth writing a virus specifically for the small number of Macs out there.
7.  See above.
8.  Again, opinion.  The best Windows computers are home made.  And price for price, they beat the pants off of anything from any company.
9.  True, but if it wasn't for Xerox, Apple wouldn't have had a GUI.  Research the Xerox Alto.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 01, 2004, 10:05:26 pm
Quote
1.  Purely opinion.  No fact to back it up.
2.  Macs crash.  In the short amounts of time that I've used them, I've seen them crash.
3.  I disabled most system pop-ups in Windows.
4.  Fast does not equal compatible.  It has trouble with many pages.
5.  Agreed.  The multimedia apps are great.
6.  It is safe, but only because nobody write viruses or bothers to find exploits for it.  That's because its not worth writing a virus specifically for the small number of Macs out there.
7.  See above.
8.  Again, opinion.  The best Windows computers are home made.  And price for price, they beat the pants off of anything from any company.
9.  True, but if it wasn't for Xerox, Apple wouldn't have had a GUI.  Research the Xerox Alto.
1.  I listed the facts to back it up.
2.  What version was it?  OS X is a lot more stable.
3.  That's great, but I don't even have to do that.
4.  I've never had trouble with any pages.
5.  Thank you.
6.  That's the whole point.  But also, I've had people write viruses for Mac and they don't do a thing.
7.  Uh, yeah, see above.
8.  Home made stuff is great, but a custom Mac beats a custom PC.  Basically, Apple has the most advanced processor.
9.  Yes, I know they got it from Xerox.  But Gates took all of Jobs' ideas.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 01, 2004, 10:19:36 pm
Quote
1.  Purely opinion.  No fact to back it up.
2.  Macs crash.  In the short amounts of time that I've used them, I've seen them crash.
3.  I disabled most system pop-ups in Windows.
4.  Fast does not equal compatible.  It has trouble with many pages.
5.  Agreed.  The multimedia apps are great.
6.  It is safe, but only because nobody write viruses or bothers to find exploits for it.  That's because its not worth writing a virus specifically for the small number of Macs out there.
7.  See above.
8.  Again, opinion.  The best Windows computers are home made.  And price for price, they beat the pants off of anything from any company.
9.  True, but if it wasn't for Xerox, Apple wouldn't have had a GUI.  Research the Xerox Alto.
Let me interpetrate.

1. There was fact. Fact is Mac OS X has gotten pretty stable! The dual 2GHz G5 must be like... GOOD!!!
2. Macs don't crash. If Macs crash, it's not OS X.
3. I didn't have to do that either.
4. I had no trouble with pages at all.
5. Yes.
6. That's the good thing about it. No one bothers, so we're in the clear. Viruses would fail anyways also. Too safe!
7. ^^^^
8. Homemade Macs pwn Homemade PC's.
9. Yep, thanx to Xerox.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 02, 2004, 05:26:26 pm
There are no home made Macs.  You can't buy parts and build one.  You can buy one and then upgrade it, but thats not the same.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 02, 2004, 05:38:56 pm
Yes there are, but that's not even the point.  To get a half-way decent PC, you gotta custom build it.  For a Mac, you buy one and your set.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 02, 2004, 08:02:13 pm
Quote
Yes there are, but that's not even the point.  To get a half-way decent PC, you gotta custom build it.  For a Mac, you buy one and your set.
Yes, a Dual 2GHz G5 from factory costs about $3000.00 USD, and it's speed is equivalent to an Alienware Aurora customized with $15,000.00 USD to it's name. Maybe a little faster. Vurginia Tech built the world's 3rd fastest supercomputer which was 10 teraflops, and cost 5.2 million dollars USD. The fastest is 35 teraflops but cost 550 million dollars USD.


Macintosh IS NOT BAD people.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 03, 2004, 12:01:29 pm
Quote
Quote
PCs:
-Give me nightmares.

Macs:
-Nothing rivals it's superiority.
-I've used Macs for 8 years.  Not once has it "crashed."
-No system pop-ups.
-The fastest internet browser out there. (http://www.apple.com/safari/)
-Movie editing and DVD burning apps bundled in. (http://www.apple.com/ilife/)
-Mac OS X has been acclaimed as the safest OS in the world.
-Mac users never give viruses a thought. They don't bother us.
-All of Apple's computers are so much better than any Dell or HP crap.
-If it weren't for the Macintosh, there wouldn't be any "Windows."  Microsoft got all its GUI (Graphical User Interface) ideas from Apple (http://www.apple.com/).
-Anyone who is not using a Mac is seriously missing out.
Uhh, like I said before.
-Steve Jobs did NOT invent the first GUI. Xerox did.
-Apple computers may be good computers, but all the hardware is only mad by Apple, so they can charge whatever they feel like.
-Most good PCs aren't made by Dell or HP, you build them yourself. You save a LOT of money doing it that way. You can't do that with an Apple.
-Most people are going to use the movie editing software.
-Microsoft still has very good browsers, such as Opera.
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 03, 2004, 04:29:53 pm
Quote
Uhh, like I said before.
-Steve Jobs did NOT invent the first GUI. Xerox did.
-Apple computers may be good computers, but all the hardware is only made by Apple, so they can charge whatever they feel like.
-Most good PCs aren't made by Dell or HP, you build them yourself. You save a LOT of money doing it that way. You can't do that with an Apple.
-Most people are going to use the movie editing software.
-Microsoft still has very good browsers, such as Opera.
1.  Uhh, like I said before, I know that.
2.  Yes, but whatever it costs, it's certainly worth it.
3.  Yes you can.
4.  Exactly.
5.  Microsoft didn't make it.  And it's available for Mac as well.  In fact, when you go to there website (http://www.opera.com/), the first thing it talks about is Opera 7.50 for Mac OS X.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 03, 2004, 04:54:56 pm
Quote
Quote
Uhh, like I said before.
-Steve Jobs did NOT invent the first GUI. Xerox did.
-Apple computers may be good computers, but all the hardware is only made by Apple, so they can charge whatever they feel like.
-Most good PCs aren't made by Dell or HP, you build them yourself. You save a LOT of money doing it that way. You can't do that with an Apple.
-Most people are going to use the movie editing software.
-Microsoft still has very good browsers, such as Opera.
1.  Uhh, like I said before, I know that.
2.  Yes, but whatever it costs, it's certainly worth it.
3.  Yes you can.
4.  Exactly.
5.  Microsoft didn't make it.  And it's available for Mac as well.  In fact, when you go to there website (http://www.opera.com/), the first thing it talks about is Opera 7.50 for Mac OS X.
1. True.
2. It's always more than it's worth.
3. That's true. I was comparing 2 Computers the same price, though, so it's fair.
4. W007.
5. [uhh]Opera's for Mac, but at the homepage it talks about it for WinXP[/uhh]
(Adding on) -Macs are alot prettier than PCs. In all places.



*EDIT* I am editing this on Opera. It dosen't give up and crash like IE6. And GIFs run while scrolling.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 03, 2004, 05:12:21 pm
THIS topic should be pinned

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 03, 2004, 05:43:39 pm
I could build a computer that outperforms a dual G5 for less than $3000.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 03, 2004, 05:45:10 pm
Quote
Quote
PCs:
-Give me nightmares.

Macs:
-Nothing rivals it's superiority.
-I've used Macs for 8 years.  Not once has it "crashed."
-No system pop-ups.
-The fastest internet browser out there. (http://www.apple.com/safari/)
-Movie editing and DVD burning apps bundled in. (http://www.apple.com/ilife/)
-Mac OS X has been acclaimed as the safest OS in the world.
-Mac users never give viruses a thought. They don't bother us.
-All of Apple's computers are so much better than any Dell or HP crap.
-If it weren't for the Macintosh, there wouldn't be any "Windows."  Microsoft got all its GUI (Graphical User Interface) ideas from Apple (http://www.apple.com/).
-Anyone who is not using a Mac is seriously missing out.
Parade for Spongey34!!!!! Mac r00lz!!! w00t w00t w00t!!!
Part A
1 Same here with me!
PArt B
1 Ture
2 NOt since I updated to Mac OS X have I had a crash. The last time I reinstalled any system software was 6 years ago.
3 With Safari
4 Depends
5 Even Bill Gates think's it's brillant  :wink1:
6 Ture
7 Yes
8 Duh!!
9 Idea came from zerxox but they never used it, and it was not a Persanol Computer.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 03, 2004, 05:50:11 pm
They did use it.  The second version of the Alto went retail.  The problem was that it cost $15,000, while a Mac was $2,000.  It was obvious which one the consumers went for.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 03, 2004, 06:00:44 pm
Quote
I could build a computer that outperforms a dual G5 for less than $3000.
... Are you implying that you hate Macintosh?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 03, 2004, 06:03:33 pm
Man you guys are way above my head. Talking all your computer and gigabites. But anyways I'd pick PC because that's what I have. It's a Dell 4300S. It works well. It's 2 years old though.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 03, 2004, 07:19:12 pm
Quote
Man you guys are way above my head. Talking all your computer and gigabites. But anyways I'd pick PC because that's what I have. It's a Dell 4300S. It works well. It's 2 years old though.
Have you even used Mac?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: winbindd on May 04, 2004, 05:30:38 pm
Quote
I could build a computer that outperforms a dual G5 for less than $3000.
Would it be legal?  :blink:
Oh yeah. Umm. I use both platforms, just as I use Windows/Linux.
Basically you guys could duke it out all day, and the fact of the matter is, people who like Mac will like mac, and those who like Windows will like windows.
Nuf Said.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 04, 2004, 05:47:48 pm
Oh yea, i forgot about the legal thing...  Ah well, a licence of Windows XP Pro can't cost that much, can it?  Anyway, for a workstation, a dual FX-53 with with a gig of low latency pc3200, a 9800xt, a 74gb 10,000rpm drive for the OS, a 250gig for storage, and all the other shiz found in a comp can be bought for ~$3000.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 06:04:15 pm
Quote
Oh yea, i forgot about the legal thing... Ah well, a licence of Windows XP Pro can't cost that much, can it? Anyway, for a workstation, a dual FX-53 with with a gig of low latency pc3200, a 9800xt, a 74gb 10,000rpm drive for the OS, a 250gig for storage, and all the other shiz found in a comp can be bought for ~$3000.
Dual FX-53? Processors?

A licence for WinXP pro costs around $250, I heard.

Are you doing this?
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 04, 2004, 06:06:49 pm
Quote
Quote
I could build a computer that outperforms a dual G5 for less than $3000.
Would it be legal?  :blink:
Oh yeah. Umm. I use both platforms, just as I use Windows/Linux.
Basically you guys could duke it out all day, and the fact of the matter is, people who like Mac will like mac, and those who like Windows will like windows.
Nuf Said.
Awww now I got the Duke Nukem theme song stuck in my head again.


Im starting a rating graph pc is better

Mac / pc

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 04, 2004, 06:20:23 pm
Quote
Quote
Oh yea, i forgot about the legal thing... Ah well, a licence of Windows XP Pro can't cost that much, can it? Anyway, for a workstation, a dual FX-53 with with a gig of low latency pc3200, a 9800xt, a 74gb 10,000rpm drive for the OS, a 250gig for storage, and all the other shiz found in a comp can be bought for ~$3000.
Dual FX-53? Processors?

A licence for WinXP pro costs around $250, I heard.

Are you doing this?
FX-53... AMD's socket 940 64bit CPUs at 2.4 ghz.

Windows XP Pro licence, $136. (http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=37-102-143&depa=6)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 04, 2004, 07:15:37 pm
Mac  ->  pc

Mac is going down in the dumps
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 07:21:03 pm
Quote
Mac  ->  pc

Mac is going down in the dumps
Mac is good. Have you used the new ones?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 04, 2004, 07:23:59 pm
BOTH Microsoft and Apple are losing their edge. Linux is rising, fast. They've already dominated the server market. It's only a matter of time until they take over the PC market.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 07:27:24 pm
Quote
BOTH Microsoft and Apple are losing their edge. Linux is rising, fast. They've already dominated the server market. It's only a matter of time until they take over the PC market.
Linux may be rising, but i'm still gonna use Mac. Mac pwns and YOU KNOW IT!!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 04, 2004, 07:32:13 pm
Quote
Quote
BOTH Microsoft and Apple are losing their edge. Linux is rising, fast. They've already dominated the server market. It's only a matter of time until they take over the PC market.
Linux may be rising, but i'm still gonna use Mac. Mac pwns and YOU KNOW IT!!!!
No, they don't. And you know that. Macs are insanely high priced, and they aren't worth it. This one is 1,000 dollars, and mine is better + cheaper. If Steve Jobs hadn't gotten rid of all the competition, he wouldn't be able to charge $2 grand for a computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 07:33:34 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
BOTH Microsoft and Apple are losing their edge. Linux is rising, fast. They've already dominated the server market. It's only a matter of time until they take over the PC market.
Linux may be rising, but i'm still gonna use Mac. Mac pwns and YOU KNOW IT!!!!
No, they don't. And you know that. Macs are insanely high priced, and they aren't worth it. This one is 1,000 dollars, and mine is better + cheaper. If Steve Jobs hadn't gotten rid of all the competition, he wouldn't be able to charge $2 grand for a computer.
We don't even know how old your Mac is.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 04, 2004, 07:42:55 pm
You don't seem to know I don't own a mac, and never will. My computer is a custom-PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 07:45:27 pm
Quote
You don't seem to know I don't own a mac, and never will. My computer is a custom-PC.
Why did you say: "This one" in that post a couple up?






Have you USED a Mac before?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 04, 2004, 07:52:53 pm
Yes. I used them all through elementary and middle school. And I hate them. With a passion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 07:54:48 pm
Then you only used old ones. And you got a CUSTOM PC! That's not a fair comparsion. By far. The new ones are like...... BETTER!










*Flame suit on*
400 posts.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 04, 2004, 08:42:21 pm
Quote
Oh yea, i forgot about the legal thing...  Ah well, a license of Windows XP Pro can't cost that much, can it?  Anyway, for a workstation, a dual FX-53 with with a gig of low latency pc3200, a 9800xt, a 74gb 10,000rpm drive for the OS, a 250gig for storage, and all the other shiz found in a comp can be bought for ~$3000.
A custom computer is great, but it's gotta have a good OS.

Quote
Windows XP Pro licence, $136. (http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=37-102-143&depa=6)
For those of you with the crazy opinions that Apple has insane prices, a license for Mac OS X is $7 less.

Quote
BOTH Microsoft and Apple are losing their edge. Linux is rising, fast. They've already dominated the server market. It's only a matter of time until they take over the PC market.
Microsoft may be, but Apple has only been getting better over the past few years, and there's no reason for that to not continue.  And Linux dominating the PC market doesn't affect us.

Quote
Yes. I used them all through elementary and middle school. And I hate them. With a passion.
Schools buy the cheapest and best computers for educational purposes.  So obviously, Macs aren't over priced and they're not just good for personal use.  People using Macs at schools get better grades and learn a lot more about what they can do with the right computer.  And I'm assuming elementary school for you goes back at least 5 years or so.  Have you noticed they've gotten way better since then?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 04, 2004, 09:15:36 pm
You're so cool Spongey!!!! :happy:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 05, 2004, 12:20:38 pm
Quote
Then you only used old ones. And you got a CUSTOM PC! That's not a fair comparsion. By far. The new ones are like...... BETTER!










*Flame suit on*
400 posts.
So what? I still paid a lot less than 1,000 for mine. A lot of PCs are custom, my dad builds them.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 01:00:33 pm
You still haven't used a NEW Mac, so why are you comparing?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 05, 2004, 01:03:10 pm
Since Macs cost like 2 grand!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 01:04:50 pm
They're worth it.



You're not comparing correctly.



 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 05, 2004, 01:11:56 pm
They may be worth it, but I'm still not going to spend 2 grand on a computer, when I can get one for a lot cheaper.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 01:15:05 pm
One that's not as good for alot cheaper.



Macs seem to keep a steady system flow, outrunning Windows-compatible systems.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 05, 2004, 02:44:16 pm
Not really. Mine was cheap, and can outperform a lot of macs. Here's a mac I found for 1,800.

$1,799.00    
   
17-inch widescreen LCD ( I have 19" CRT)
1.25GHz PowerPC G4 ( I have AMD 1.8)
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra ( I have ATI Radeon 9200)
64MB DDR video memory ( I have 128)
256MB DDR333 SDRAM ( i have 512)
80GB Ultra ATA hard drive ( I have 80)
SuperDrive
Apple Pro Speakers ( I dont use speakers that much)
AirPort Extreme Ready (dont know what this is)
Bluetooth Option (dont have anything to use this)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 04:14:43 pm
You can get a Mac for $999.00 that includes:
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
256MB DDR333 SDRAM
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive

... that's not $2000, just to let you know.
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 05, 2004, 04:56:23 pm
You can get a PC for $999 including a 19" monitor that will easily outperform that.  In fact, I'm helping my friend Vulture build a ~$800 gaming computer right now.

OS X isn't as secure as you might think. (http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?newsid=1497)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 04:59:50 pm
I already read that, but big deal.  Nothing's perfect.  A few security holes is a lot better than a whole OS full of them.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: mallorymaloney on May 05, 2004, 05:01:03 pm
Oh, puh-lease. PC forever. I'm never ever even going to TRY a Mac.

Oh ... I guess that means I don't have a 'backup' to my whining.  :dry:
















Whatever.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 05:12:44 pm
Quote
Oh, puh-lease. PC forever. I'm never ever even going to TRY a Mac.
That's the problem.  People are hooked on there good-for-nothing PC, and are afraid to even try something that's way better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 05, 2004, 05:28:01 pm
Quote
That's the problem.  People are hooked on there good-for-nothing PC, and are afraid to even try something that's way better.
It's not as much that as the fact that you have to be a doctor to afford one. That's why I like Microsoft. He's like the model T. Not the best in the west, but every Tom, Dick and Harry can afford one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 05:32:00 pm
Thats right. PCs crash every 0.0000000000000001 second. Errors are so common. I had to reboot my PC twice today, and Macs NEVER give me crap. Get something good next time, Mac stomps all other OSes into the ground permenantly. I think they named it Windows because it deserves to fly out a window. Macs were named Mac because... well it's a better name anyways. Carry your PC to the nearest skyscraper, go to the top level, and throw it down into a lot.
Macs will spit on its shreds later.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 05:32:05 pm
Quote
It's not as much that as the fact that you have to be a doctor to afford one. That's why I like Microsoft. He's like the model T. Not the best in the west, but every Tom, Dick and Harry can afford one.
Didn't I already explain how they're not expensive? :rolleyes: And the ones that do cost more, are more than worth it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 05:34:59 pm
Quote
Didn't I already explain how they're not expensive? :rolleyes: And the ones that do cost more, are more than worth it.
I tried explaining that to them, they don't believe at all. Thats because some people need to use a Mac, for they never tried one.


Mac will spit on Window's shreds.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 05, 2004, 05:39:47 pm
My Dad works with computers. He knows his stuff. He bought one Mac for us, just to show us what it was like. We got a new computer (a PC) and there is no comparison. So much more stuff seems available on PCs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 05:45:08 pm
So what if alot is avalible for PC?


The Mac you have is 5 years old. Your PC is new. Wassupwitdat? You're comparing them? WRONG!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 05, 2004, 05:47:27 pm
Quote
my PC
Hmm......... You own what you hate? I'll throw mine off the skyscraper as soon as you do yours.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 05:51:57 pm
Quote
My Dad works with computers. He knows his stuff. He bought one Mac for us, just to show us what it was like. We got a new computer (a PC) and there is no comparison. So much more stuff seems available on PCs.
There's more stuff, but we got the better stuff.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 05, 2004, 05:54:38 pm
Quote
Quote
My Dad works with computers. He knows his stuff. He bought one Mac for us, just to show us what it was like. We got a new computer (a PC) and there is no comparison. So much more stuff seems available on PCs.
There's more stuff, but we got the better stuff.
I don't know about that. I have a cool Video editing and picture editing program on here. They rock. Oh, and why does my Mac use WINDOWS Media Player? Do they have their own?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 06:06:53 pm
Quote
I don't know about that.
I do know about that.
Quote
I have a cool Video editing and picture editing program on here. They rock.
I have Garage Band, iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, and iDVD.  I also have DVD Studio Pro, Final Cut Pro, and Soundtrack.  All those rock even more.
Quote
Oh, and why does my Mac use WINDOWS Media Player?
Mac users stay far away from Windows Media Player.  For some reason, Microsoft makes a Mac version of it, in hopes that we'll download it, but we don't need it, or even want it.  
Quote
Do they have their own?
Yes.  It's called QuickTime Pro.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 05, 2004, 06:46:36 pm
Forget that stuff.  It's all about the games.  And games are where Windows is the only way to go. (unfortunately)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 05, 2004, 06:57:42 pm
Quote
Quote
Mac  ->  pc

Mac is going down in the dumps
Mac is good. Have you used the new ones?
Yeah i tried one it was ok but it sucked on the fact that the monitor was with the comp

 Mac  \|/  Pc
 
im unsure
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 05, 2004, 07:02:10 pm
Macs may be very good computers, but they aren't worth the price they're charging. A lot more software is produced for Windows too.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 08:16:07 pm
Quote
Forget that stuff.  It's all about the games.  And games are where Windows is the only way to go. (unfortunately)
Computers aren't for games.  That's why they made game systems.  And even so, there are a lot of good games out there for Macs.
Quote
Yeah i tried one it was ok but it sucked on the fact that the monitor was with the comp
Uh, that's one of the best parts.
Quote
Macs may be very good computers, but they aren't worth the price they're charging. A lot more software is produced for Windows too.
How many times do I have to say this?  They're not over priced and there is a lot of software out there for Macs, which you obviously don't know about.  You people are too close-minded.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 09:36:31 pm
Quote
Yeah i tried one it was ok but it sucked on the fact that the monitor was with the comp
 
You hate it because of that? I like it because. Warrants space. And it's fast anyway.
 



Quote
Hmm......... You own what you hate?

Yes. If I could get one for $1500 (what this hulking death trap costs) I would get a Mac.



Quote
Computers aren't for games. That's why they made game systems. And even so, there are a lot of good games out there for Macs.

Word.



Quote
Macs may be very good computers, but they aren't worth the price they're charging. A lot more software is produced for Windows too.

They are worth the price. Even more than the price they charge. ALOT MORE. Trust me.





Spongey, you know about the Virginia Tech X, right?  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 05, 2004, 09:41:15 pm
I most certainly do.  I think it's cool.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 05, 2004, 09:42:38 pm
And the truth about it pwns geeks to smithereens. :biggrin:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 06, 2004, 03:57:36 am
1.  I hate Windows as much as the next guy, but if I'm going to give up the huge amounts of good apps and games, I'm giving it up for something better.  Which would be Linux.  It's free, open source, stable, and secure.
2.  No matter what you say, the Mac is overpriced.  If you're not willing to except the truth, continue living on in delusion.  I don't care.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 07:59:19 am
The Mac isn't overpriced. They're more than worth it. Do you know about Virginia Tech's Supercomputer? That proves that Mac is the best. Mac is better than Windows and you know it. Spongey is right.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 04:04:43 pm
No matter what you think, the Mac is not overpriced. If you are not willing to except the truth, continue living on in delusion. I don not care.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 04:12:25 pm
This (http://www.apple.com/hardware/video/virginiatech/) may prove something. Watch it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 06, 2004, 04:20:48 pm
Macs are great computers, but still, I'll never pay 2 grand for a freaking computer. Windows isn't the greatest, but it's a lot cheaper than buying a Mac. If more people were able to produce Macs, then more people would use them. But no one will buy these insanely high priced computers.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 04:26:19 pm
Quote
This (http://www.apple.com/hardware/video/virginiatech/) may prove something. Watch it.
This (http://homepage.mac.com/art.v/.Movies/Gates_Win98_Crash_Demo.mov) may prove something else.  Watch it. :laugh:

Quote
If more people were able to produce Macs, then more people would use them..
If more people were able to produce Macs, then they wouldn't be half as good.  Apple knwo's what they're doing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 05:25:00 pm
Haha blue screen! PWN3D!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 06, 2004, 05:36:37 pm
Quote
Haha blue screen! PWN3D!
What the heck....

I've never gotten 1 blue screen on my PC. It's given me no trouble, except for my wireless card, which happens on all.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 05:38:15 pm
I know, I don't think XP is supposed to get it much. It's rare.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 05:41:44 pm
Yeah, it was an old Windows 98 thing, but it was still funny.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 06, 2004, 06:14:09 pm
Quote
Haha blue screen! PWN3D!
Number one he wasn't pwned. The fact that almost all mac users live their lives putting mac bumper stickers on their cars pwn themselves.

All Kevin is saying is that Macs are way too expensive. I'm not paying 2,000 dollars for a machine that most software won't work for. Then you wonder, "Hmm..... I wonder why the software doesn't work. Oh yeah I know. No one owns a mac to buy the software!"

PWN3D
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 06, 2004, 06:17:44 pm
Now that is PWNing! Usually games come out for windows a year earlier than for Macs. Or not at all! Which really can suck
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 06:25:32 pm
Quote
PWN3D
Yeah, except you obviously don't know what your talking about.

Quote
The fact that almost all mac users live their lives putting mac bumper stickers on their cars pwn themselves.
Uh, I don't know where you got that from.
Quote
All Kevin is saying is that Macs are way too expensive.
All I'm saying is you guys are so wrong it's not even funny.

Quote
I'm not paying 2,000 dollars for a machine that most software won't work for. Then you wonder, "Hmm..... I wonder why the software doesn't work. Oh yeah I know. No one owns a mac to buy the software!"
First of all, that just doesn't make sense.  Second of all, there's a ton of high quality software out there for Macs.

Quote
Usually games come out for windows a year earlier than for Macs. Or not at all! Which really can suck
No they don't...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 06:31:29 pm
Quote
"Hmm..... I wonder why the software doesn't work. Oh yeah I know. No one owns a mac to buy the software!"
If no one uses a Mac, why is my dad, spongey, my stepdad, and alot of other people are using the pwning OS as we speak?

The folder system is alot better on Mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 06, 2004, 06:32:01 pm
Quote
Yeah, except you obviously don't know what your talking about.

As a matter of fact I do. My sister owns a mac. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Quote
Uh, I don't know where you got that from.

The fact that you have this much love for a inanimate object proves that you are one of those people.

Quote
All I'm saying is you guys are so wrong it's not even funny.

Prove me wrong then.

Quote
First of all, that just doesn't make sense.  Second of all, there's a ton of high quality software out there for Macs.

Not really. Almost every program can be beaten by a PC alternative.


Quote
If no one uses a Mac, why is my dad, spongey, my stepdad, and alot of other people are using the pwning OS as we speak?

Well let's see. Your dad and step dad are family.  Spongey is one more person, and "alot of other people" doesn't really help the situation much.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 06, 2004, 06:34:14 pm
Quote



Quote
Usually games come out for windows a year earlier than for Macs. Or not at all! Which really can suck
No they don't...
I'm not saying the games suck I'm saying the wait sucks.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 06, 2004, 06:35:45 pm
Another prob with me is that GM don't work on macs

 Mac   *   Pc


Ugggh
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 06, 2004, 06:36:50 pm
This Topic MUST be pinned
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 06:40:10 pm
Quote
As a matter of fact I do. My sister owns a mac. I know exactly what I'm talking about.
If it was OS X and you actuall used it extensively you would know that Macs are better, so you wouldn't have posted that.
Quote
The fact that you have this much love for a inanimate object proves that you are one of those people.
Since when do I have love for a inanimate object?  I've never baught an Apple bumper sticker or whatever.  I'm just telling everyone the smart way to go.
Quote
Prove me wrong then.
I already have, but if you want me to again, I gladly will.
Quote
Not really. Almost every program can be beaten by a PC alternative.
Are you kidding?  No way an app made by/for Micro$oft can beat out one by Apple, or the people that develop programs for it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 06, 2004, 06:40:17 pm
Yes, they do.  I could give specific figures if you want.  But I'll save myself time by saying that games are released on Windows first 99% of the time, and many never reach Macs.  

And yes, Macs are expensive.  If you have money to burn, you don't play games, and you don't have the skill necessary to use Linux, go ahead and buy a Mac.

Types of Computer users, and what they need:

1.  Average Joe -  Doesn't know, or care, what his/her system is running, as long as it can send an email.   The dude should have Windows, because it's cheap.  They don't need to spend $1,500 for an email box.  They can get a crappy Windows box for $500.

2.  Gamer - Needs Windows, because thats THE gaming OS.

3.  Programmer - Most likely has the ability to use Linux, and will do so.

4.  Multimedia creater person - Stays the heck away from Linux, but after that, it's a toss-up between Mac and Windows.  Windows has the 3d apps, but Apple has the video editing apps.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 06, 2004, 06:41:06 pm
Quote
This Topic MUST be pinned
*Pinned* :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 06, 2004, 06:42:17 pm
Quote
Yes, they do.  I could give specific figures if you want.  But I'll save myself time by saying that games are released on Windows first 99% of the time, and many never reach Macs.  

And yes, Macs are expensive.  If you have money to burn, you don't play games, and you don't have the skill necessary to use Linux, go ahead and buy a Mac.

Types of Computer users, and what they need:

1.  Average Joe -  Doesn't know, or care, what his/her system is running, as long as it can send an email.   The dude should have Windows, because it's cheap.  They don't need to spend $1,500 for an email box.  They can get a crappy Windows box for $500.

2.  Gamer - Needs Windows, because thats THE gaming OS.

3.  Programmer - Most likely has the ability to use Linux, and will do so.

4.  Multimedia creater person - Stays the heck away from Linux, but after that, it's a toss-up between Mac and Windows.  Windows has the 3d apps, but Apple has the video editing apps.
I'm an Average Joe and Gamer.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 06, 2004, 06:45:52 pm
I'm a gamer, graphics designer, and I do a little programming.  I dislike Windows, but I can't give up Photoshop, 3d Studio Max, and all the games to go to Linux.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 06, 2004, 06:49:09 pm
I sometimes game, do a lot of PhotoShop stuff, and use FrontPage and WinTV. I don't think WinTV is on Mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 06, 2004, 06:52:36 pm
The reasons why i don't like macs

1. The monitor is with the comp
2. they are over priced
3. They did not have the first graphical OS
4. basicly anything i like won't work under it

Mac  -> Pc  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 06, 2004, 06:53:03 pm
There's a lot of stuff Windows has that Mac doesn't.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 06, 2004, 06:56:10 pm
Quote
The reasons why i don't like macs

1. The monitor is with the comp
2. they are over priced
3. They did not have the first graphical OS
4. basicly anything i like won't work under it

Mac  -> Pc  
The third reason is sort of rediculous.  That's not a reason not to use Macs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 07:38:14 pm
The Earth Simulator by NEC is the fastest supercomputer avalible, at 35 Teraflops, and cost 350 Million dollars.
The Los Alamos Lab by HP is the world's second fastest supercomputer, at 13 teraflops, and cost 215 Million dollars.
The Virginia Tech System X by Apple is the world's third fastest supercomputer, at 10 teraflops, and cost 5.2 Million dollars.


Ya hear?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 06, 2004, 07:45:53 pm
Quote
Quote
The reasons why i don't like macs

1. The monitor is with the comp
2. they are over priced
3. They did not have the first graphical OS
4. basicly anything i like won't work under it

Mac  -> Pc  
The third reason is sort of rediculous.  That's not a reason not to use Macs.
I just heard that

Also another proble is that if something beaks, you have to buy a whole new mac but if the monitor is seperpate maybe so...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 07:57:39 pm
You don't have to do that with all Macs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 06, 2004, 08:29:19 pm
Quote
And yes, Macs are expensive.  If you have money to burn, you don't play games, and you don't have the skill necessary to use Linux, go ahead and buy a Mac.
And yes, Macs are worth it.  If you have the money to spend wisely, go ahead and buy a Mac.

Quote
1.  Average Joe -  Doesn't know, or care, what his/her system is running, as long as it can send an email.   The dude should have Windows, because it's cheap.  They don't need to spend $1,500 for an email box.  They can get a crappy Windows box for $500.

2.  Gamer - Needs Windows, because thats THE gaming OS.

3.  Programmer - Most likely has the ability to use Linux, and will do so.

4.  Multimedia creater person - Stays the heck away from Linux, but after that, it's a toss-up between Mac and Windows.  Windows has the 3d apps, but Apple has the video editing apps.
1.  Exactly.  Windows isn't meant for people that know what they're doing.  It can't do much.
2.  Gamer- has every game system under the sun and doesn't need to bother with Windows.
3.  It's called Apple Developer Connection (http://developer.apple.com/).
4.  Adobe makes the best stuff (for both Windows and Mac) but Apple has their own stuff too.  And there most certainly are 3D apps for Mac.

Quote
The reasons why i don't like macs

1. The monitor is with the comp
2. they are over priced
3. They did not have the first graphical OS
4. basicly anything i like won't work under it
1.  That's a good thing, not bad.
2.  They're not and they are worth it.
3.  They had it before Windows did.
4.  Don't know what you like, but I can assume you're wrong.


Quote
There's a lot of stuff Windows has that Mac doesn't.
Well, you got me there.  We don't have all those viruses.  But other than that, there's a lot of quality stuff Macs have that Windows doesn't.

Quote
The Earth Simulator by NEC is the fastest supercomputer avalible, at 35 Teraflops, and cost 350 Million dollars.
The Los Alamos Lab by HP is the world's second fastest supercomputer, at 13 teraflops, and cost 215 Million dollars.
The Virginia Tech System X by Apple is the world's third fastest supercomputer, at 10 teraflops, and cost 5.2 Million dollars.


Ya hear?
I hear, but apparently no one else does.  That's called insanely cheap, not insanely expensive.

Quote
Also another proble is that if something beaks, you have to buy a whole new mac but if the monitor is seperpate maybe so...
No you don't.  You can easily get the one piece from the actual computer part replaced.  But, the chances of something breaking is unlikely, anyway.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 06, 2004, 09:17:09 pm
I see that a Mac OS 10.4 Tiger is standing by for the checkered flag to drop, beating Windoze XP to the ground.
Quote
That's called insanely cheap, not insanely expensive.

Yep.

Quote
Average Joe -  Doesn't know, or care, what his/her system is running, as long as it can send an email.   The dude should have Windows, because it's cheap.  They don't need to spend $1,500 for an email box.  They can get a crappy Windows box for $500.

Thats right. Windoze are for people that have no idea what[/i] company made their computer, and think the straining in their system are normal.

Quote
Macs are worth it.

They're more than worth it. About 20 times worth it, if you know what i'm talking about.


Spongey is so cool! :tongue:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 07, 2004, 12:23:15 pm
If I had $5.2 million, I would happily buy a G5 supercomputer.  But I have ~$700, so I'm building a Windows gaming rig.  As for games, FPS's and RTS's are where PC is king.  With the exception of Halo (which is on PC, but which I prefer on Xbox), all of the good FPS's are on PC (yes, I realize that Counter Strike, Half Life, and other PC FPSs are released for consoles, but they are much better on a keyboard and mouse).  RTS's are just not feasable using a controller.  A mouse is needed for the experience to be smooth.  In most other genres, consoles are better though.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 07, 2004, 12:40:36 pm
If I had 300 million bucks I wouldn't waste it on a computer. As far as the games go, what about online play and PC exclusive games. A computer can do stuff a consle can't do. Of course consles can go online but for Xbox live you pay monthly fees. Online play for Pc is much more convenient. :sleep:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 07, 2004, 01:02:13 pm
Quote
If I had $5.2 million, I would happily buy a G5 supercomputer.  But I have ~$700, so I'm building a Windows gaming rig.  As for games, FPS's and RTS's are where PC is king.  With the exception of Halo (which is on PC, but which I prefer on Xbox), all of the good FPS's are on PC (yes, I realize that Counter Strike, Half Life, and other PC FPSs are released for consoles, but they are much better on a keyboard and mouse).  RTS's are just not feasable using a controller.  A mouse is needed for the experience to be smooth.  In most other genres, consoles are better though.
Gamers should get WinXP. I like Mac OS X because of their elegance, stability, and comfort. If your only gonna use your comp for games, go ahead and get Windows.  


Quote
If I had 300 million bucks I wouldn't waste it on a computer.

It dosen't cost $300 Million. It costs 5.2 million.



BTW, The G5 supercomputer was brought up to show that Mac is roughly 20 times worth it, compared to PCs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 07, 2004, 01:08:05 pm
Quote
Quote
If I had $5.2 million, I would happily buy a G5 supercomputer.  But I have ~$700, so I'm building a Windows gaming rig.  As for games, FPS's and RTS's are where PC is king.  With the exception of Halo (which is on PC, but which I prefer on Xbox), all of the good FPS's are on PC (yes, I realize that Counter Strike, Half Life, and other PC FPSs are released for consoles, but they are much better on a keyboard and mouse).  RTS's are just not feasable using a controller.  A mouse is needed for the experience to be smooth.  In most other genres, consoles are better though.
Gamers should get WinXP. I like Mac OS X because of their elegance, stability, and comfort. If your only gonna use your comp for games, go ahead and get Windows.  


Quote
If I had 300 million bucks I wouldn't waste it on a computer.

It dosen't cost $300 Million. It costs 5.2 million.



BTW, The G5 supercomputer was brought up to show that Mac is roughly 20 times worth it, compared to PCs.
Thank you for admitting that.

Those $100+ million computers are not PCs.  They are supercomputers that run specialized OSes that scale well to handle huge numbers of processors.  It's fairly old hardware, but there is tons of it, and it uses a huge amount of power.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 07, 2004, 01:09:34 pm
Yeah I admitted it because that WinXP gets games first. It's good if you have both.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 07, 2004, 01:13:14 pm
Somewhat unrelated:  I wonder what Microsoft has in store for Longhorn...  It's supposedly going to be the biggest change since Windows 3.1 to Windows 95.  Hopefully Microsoft resolves the stability issues.  I don't think security will be vastly improved.  As long as the computer is on and accessable remotely, someone will figure out a way to exploit it.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 07, 2004, 01:16:03 pm
Maximum PC said that you can go to the website (http://www.smartbarxp.com/), and download a beta version of it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 07, 2004, 01:22:14 pm
lol.  Windows is crappy enough to start with.  I couldn't imagine using a beta version of it.  If I had a spare box, I suppose I would install it for fun.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 07, 2004, 04:39:04 pm
First off, the whole comparison of the super computer wasn't to tell you to go out and spend 5 million dollars, it was to show all doubters that Macs aren't that expensive, especially in the long run.  And Longhorn better be good, because it will have taken them a long time, but I'm betting it won't be much better.  Of course, I could care less.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongemonkey13 on May 07, 2004, 05:06:45 pm
er as long as i can access my fave forums and my email i dont really care what it is.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 07, 2004, 06:29:02 pm
:mellow: Whoops there it goe's... yup my brain stopped...

I prefer Pc's all of the carshing thingys, noise thingys and money thingys you said are false My brothers dell has not crashed once, it is super quiet and it was only $300

Mac -------------------------------------------------> Pc






 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 07, 2004, 10:08:53 pm
My mom's Dell has crashed twice this week. It's making a straining noise right now, and its really slow, so your brother's Dell is probably really slow anyway.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 08, 2004, 09:52:16 am
Quote
My mom's Dell has crashed twice this week. It's making a straining noise right now, and its really slow, so your brother's Dell is probably really slow anyway.
Quote
My mom's Dell has crashed twice this week. It's making a straining noise right now, and its really slow
She must have a dell optiplex gl "post a pic of it to let me see"

Quote
so your brother's Dell is probably really slow anyway.
FYI it goe's 2.0 ghz, it has a FSB of 533,  128mb video card adn 160 gb of space and 1 stick of 512 mb ram
Ur mums must go 200mhz

Now mine goes 2.5 ghz with a volcano heat sync 128mb video card 120gb of space a 52x cd burner a 32x cd reader for back up, 2 FD's FSB 333mhz and an asus mb all put in a big dog computer case
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 08, 2004, 09:55:31 am
My mom's computer is a Dell Dimension 4500. I HATE THIS CRAP! It takes 10 minutes to boot MS Word. And it's a 3.0 GHz.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 08, 2004, 11:42:26 am
Quote
Now mine goes 2.5 ghz with a volcano heat sync 128mb video card 120gb of space a 52x cd burner a 32x cd reader for back up, 2 FD's FSB 333mhz and an asus mb all put in a big dog computer case
You can't get all that for just $300.
And an 800 MHz Mac is faster than a 2 GHz PC.  That's just the way it is.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 08, 2004, 04:27:04 pm
oops it was $800

no that is not true my bros friend has a 800mhz 128mb ram 30gb hdd 64mb vc comp and it is slow

Pat101 ur moms comp must have spyware or a slow hard drive or slow fsb

Spongey34 patrick101 I have a question
Have you ever built one computer?

and im starting to suspect that all those so called statement you said are false you just hate dells and pc's

then again maybe not...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 08, 2004, 04:35:51 pm
Quote
oops it was $800

no that is not true my bros friend has a 800mhz 128mb ram 30gb hdd 64mb vc comp and it is slow

Pat101 ur moms comp must have spyware or a slow hard drive or slow fsb

Spongey34 patrick101 I have a question
Have you ever built one computer?

and im starting to suspect that all those so called statement you said are false you just hate dells and pc's

then again maybe not...
Yeah, my mom's comp probably does got spyware.
I've never built a computer.
The statements are true.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 08, 2004, 04:42:51 pm
.... better scan and get rid of it



Hey guess what i got a laser pirnter at a thrift depart. store
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 08, 2004, 05:32:34 pm
Quote
no that is not true my bros friend has a 800mhz 128mb ram 30gb hdd 64mb vc comp and it is slow
Is it a Mac?  I said an 800 MHz Mac is faster than a 2 GHz PC. I know that an 800 MHz PC is not faster than a 2 GHz PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 08, 2004, 05:43:58 pm
Quote
My mom's computer is a Dell Dimension 4500. I HATE THIS CRAP! It takes 10 minutes to boot MS Word. And it's a 3.0 GHz.
mabey you just have to much crap in it.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 08, 2004, 06:59:16 pm
Quote
Quote
no that is not true my bros friend has a 800mhz 128mb ram 30gb hdd 64mb vc comp and it is slow
Is it a Mac?  I said an 800 MHz Mac is faster than a 2 GHz PC. I know that an 800 MHz PC is not faster than a 2 GHz PC.
Spongey34 what proof do u have?!?!?!?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 08, 2004, 09:03:19 pm
I have an 800 MHz Mac of my own, and I've used PCs that are at least 2 GHz, and my computer is a lot faster.  That's what proof I have.  And I've heard other people say the same thing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Alain2k5 on May 08, 2004, 09:27:51 pm
this topic is getting dumb.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 08, 2004, 09:43:42 pm
Here's what happened when Longhorn was previewed the other day:
"It seems that the greatest challenge for Microsoft will be simulating the stability of Mac OS X. During the presentation, a comparison of workflow in Longhorn and Windows XP by Jim Allchin, vice-president of Microsoft, reportedly went sour. When Allchin attempted to launch Quake on the Longhorn equipped machine, it slowly crashed and died. Allchin immediately attempted to downplay the glitch, saying the test PC was slow and the demo worked fine during previous tests."-AppleInsider (http://appleinsider.com/article.php?id=445)
...what a suprise.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 08, 2004, 10:42:13 pm
Quote
Quote
My mom's computer is a Dell Dimension 4500. I HATE THIS CRAP! It takes 10 minutes to boot MS Word. And it's a 3.0 GHz.
mabey you just have to much crap in it.
I don't got nothing in it. Alot of the storage in the drives are open.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 12, 2004, 03:34:43 pm
Mac's are better for video editing and graphic's work. Did you know that even most P.C. Magizines are published on Mac's because they are supier to a P.C, for graphic's works. And Bill Gate's said the iMovie is brillant. And here's a list of firsts:
1. First consumer level GUI
2. First consumer level 3.5 floppy drive
3. First consuner computer with a mouse standard.
4. First speach technoledgy
5. plug and play
6. first animation techledgy
7. first color matching screen, scanner,  printer
8. first sound input
9. first virtual reality
10. first Built in Networking
11. first CD-Rom
12. first ture unix based consummer OS, (sorry people but the average user won't use Linux)
13. First 64 bit proscer in a concummer machine
14. First computer without a floopy
15. first computer
16. First consumer digital video editing software.
And their's tons and tons of more!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 12, 2004, 04:40:50 pm
Let's see tons and tons more!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 12, 2004, 04:55:05 pm
Quote
12. first ture unix based consummer OS, (sorry people but the average user won't use Linux)
Yep, the simple truth why Mac OS X and Linux are far better than Windows is because it's Unix based.

And notice all those "First"s.  Basically, Bill has taken almost every idea that Apple has, gave it his own little touch, and shipped it off as his own.  At the WinHEC conference last week, everything Bill talked about was stuff that Apple already came up with.  But ideas were meant to be borrowed anyway, so enough about that stuff.    The sad thing is, somehow Microsoft is still years behind Apple, in just about every aspect of the computer industry.  And when they actually get a good, original idea, "somewhere between the idea and planning of a project and the actual finished project, they manage to screw so many things up that the end-user experience is something less than ideal."
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 12, 2004, 05:34:35 pm
1. First consumer level GUI ???
2. First consumer level 3.5 floppy drive X Naw that was something with ibm
3. First consuner computer with a mouse standard. X wrong
4. First speach technoledgy c
5. plug and play c
6. first animation techledgy X I have seen older pcs with ani tech
7. first color matching screen, scanner, printer X
8. first sound input C
9. first virtual reality C
10. first Built in Networking X You could use netbios with old comps
11. first CD-Rom C
12. first ture unix based consummer OS, (sorry people but the average user won't use Linux) X what cmonkey said
13. First 64 bit proscer in a concummer machine X what cmonkey said
14. First computer without a floopy X you need floppies to boot
15. first computer   X Pfft
16. First consumer digital video editing software. X It was availible to pc's but was expensive

Inside my comp
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 12, 2004, 07:47:14 pm
Quote
Mac's are better for video editing and graphic's work. Did you know that even most P.C. Magizines are published on Mac's because they are supier to a P.C, for graphic's works. And Bill Gate's said the iMovie is brillant. And here's a list of firsts:
1. First consumer level GUI
2. First consumer level 3.5 floppy drive
3. First consuner computer with a mouse standard.
4. First speach technoledgy
5. plug and play
6. first animation techledgy
7. first color matching screen, scanner,  printer
8. first sound input
9. first virtual reality
10. first Built in Networking
11. first CD-Rom
12. first ture unix based consummer OS, (sorry people but the average user won't use Linux)
13. First 64 bit proscer in a concummer machine
14. First computer without a floopy
15. first computer
16. First consumer digital video editing software.
And their's tons and tons of more!!
Almost all of those are incorrect, but I'm limited on time here, so I'll just cover some of the crucial ones.

15. First computer - That made me laugh, sorry.

14.  Hmm, no.

13.  It was possible for a consumer to buy a 64bit desktop before the G5 came out.

12.  No, Linux, especially with distros like Red Hat, Suse, Lindows, Xandros, Mepis, etc. is readily being accepted by consumers worldwide.  I'm pretty sure it has already passed Mac in percentage of current desktops.  Also, OSX is based on a varient of BSD which is a varient of System V which Unix is a varient of.  It is technically not unix based.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 12, 2004, 08:02:32 pm
Quote
Almost all of those are incorrect,
True, but I can come up with the ones that are correct, plus, I'd like to see what a Windows fan can come up with.
Quote
12.  ...it is technically not unix based.
Actualy, it is (http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 12, 2004, 08:08:35 pm
I'm not a Windows fan, so I'm not going to argue in favor of it.  Mac OS X is BSD based.  BSD is not based on Unix.  Unix and BSD are both based on System V.  Meaning that OS X is related to Unix, but is not derived from it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 12, 2004, 08:48:09 pm
Yeah, but it has the stability and whatnot of Unix, which is something Windows lacks.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 14, 2004, 05:32:10 pm
Ok, how many people actually OWN a digital camcorder?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 14, 2004, 05:34:23 pm
I have a digital camera, and a digital camcorder.  I make my own movies.  Special effects and all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 14, 2004, 08:36:55 pm
Well Macs suck one because you can't add anything to i you can just upgrade it

and the g5 only goe's 2.0ghz
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 14, 2004, 09:22:13 pm
Uh, there's lots of stuff you can add to it.

And that's true, but it out preforms 3 GHz Dells and HPs and whatever.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 15, 2004, 07:28:20 am
Seriously, they may ahve better video editing, but not many people can afford to buy a digital camcorder.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 15, 2004, 08:59:26 am
Quote

and the g5 only goe's 2.0ghz
The processors don't need as high amounts of CPU cycles, so they don't need as big Gigahertz in processors to keep up. And it's dual. So it's simple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: TeiEX Thyferra on May 15, 2004, 01:11:01 pm
Quote
OK, first off, its not PeeCee. Its PC. It stands for Personal Computer.

Well, I hate macintosh computers. They suck, and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple. And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
amen brotha! macs = TRASH

macs dont have any cool games, you cant buy nice video cards for them (excpt the $400 16 MB cards) and the like

Long live the PC!!!  :closedeyes: *worships computer*
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 15, 2004, 01:29:05 pm
Quote
amen brotha! macs = TRASH
Just another stupid comment...
Quote
macs dont have any cool games, you cant buy nice video cards for them (excpt the $400 16 MB cards) and the like
Actual, Macs have lots of games.  And again, computers aren't for games.
Quote
Long live the PC!!!  :closedeyes: *worships computer*
Dude, I'd kill myself before I worshiped a PC.  I mean, looking at them is bad enough, and using them is even worse.  But that's just down right scary.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 15, 2004, 01:36:08 pm
Quote
computers aren't for games.
Computers can be for a lot of things. That's the beauty of a computer. You can customize it to do whatever you want.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 15, 2004, 01:37:27 pm
Yes, I know.  That's the beauty of a Mac. It can do so much more than Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: TeiEX Thyferra on May 15, 2004, 04:44:16 pm
Quote
Quote
Long live the PC!!!  :closedeyes: *worships computer*
Dude, I'd kill myself before I worshiped a PC.  I mean, looking at them is bad enough, and using them is even worse.  But that's just down right scary.
geez i was kidding about worshiping it. and yes, i would kill myself before i would ACTUALLY do that
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 15, 2004, 07:00:45 pm
Spongey must feel really bad for me now... I'm using a Dell. But in only 5 weeks the abuse ends.


People that hate Macs have only used the old ones.


Some OSes can get along, while others can't. Tux dosen't abuse the Mac.  :tongue:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 15, 2004, 09:48:38 pm
Quote
Some OSes can get along, while others can't. Tux dosen't abuse the Mac.  :tongue:
Haha!  Gotta love it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 08:48:53 am
But then again...


Linux dosen't like Windows...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 10:50:59 am
Of course.  The good OSs are friends, and neither of them like the bad OS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 16, 2004, 11:35:36 am
1.  Linux and Windows can run on the same hardware.  You can dual-boot.  With a Mac, support for other OSs is slow.  For example, Yellow Dog is the only distro that runs on a G5.

2.  Windows can run on Linux using VMware.

3.  None of the OSs cooperate.  It would eat into potential profits.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 11:40:39 am
I know, I was just joking...

And there are ways to run other OSs on a Mac.  You can also easily connect to your Mac ( and control it) while running Windows on a seperate computer, and the other way around.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 16, 2004, 11:43:03 am
Yea, VNC.  VNC isn't the same as running the OS on your hardware though.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 11:54:00 am
Yes, but the end result is basically the same.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 16, 2004, 12:05:53 pm
No, it's not.  Example:   You're running a VNC server on 500mhz box.  You're running the client on a 2.4 ghz box.  You're going to see the performance of the 500mhz box, not the 2.4.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 12:11:19 pm
So?  You can't really tell the difference.  I'd take the performance of a 500 MHz Mac over a 2 GHz PC, anyway.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 03:32:32 pm
Why would you run a bad OS on a good computer anyway?

Plus, I heard VNC is no good.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 03:46:51 pm
I don't.  What I'm saying is, for example, you're at school and stuck with Windows, but you could acces your Mac from there if you wanted to.  Simple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 04:03:52 pm
Like Remote Desktop?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 04:07:47 pm
Yeah.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 16, 2004, 04:15:00 pm
VNC works well, especially on a decent internet connection.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 04:22:13 pm
How would it work on ISDN (128K)?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 16, 2004, 04:33:11 pm
Err... not very well  :tongue:    
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 16, 2004, 04:35:21 pm
Yeah. :laugh:  My connection speed is good.  And Safari makes it even faster, when it comes to web browsing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 04:53:31 pm
THAT'S JUST ON MY dell. ON MY DAD'S g4, i GOT LIKE 768k OR SOMEHING LIKE THAT.eITHER THAT OR IT'S JUST MACS PWN RUNNING SAFARI.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 16, 2004, 04:59:48 pm
Quote
Spongey must feel really bad for me now... I'm using a Dell. But in only 5 weeks the abuse ends.


People that hate Macs have only used the old ones.


Some OSes can get along, while others can't. Tux dosen't abuse the Mac.  :tongue:
OMG are those ISA slots? those are a thing of the past...

yet ISA sound cards sound a heck of a lot better than PCI
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 16, 2004, 05:01:34 pm
No they're PCI.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 18, 2004, 06:52:23 am
PC's da bomb. You know why? Cause I said so :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 18, 2004, 08:17:31 am
Quote
PC's da bomb. You know why? Cause I said so :P
If they're da bomb, why do they waste so many CPU cycles for no reason? And they wear down and crash often too much.




Macs pwn. PCs suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 18, 2004, 11:54:37 am
Quote
Quote
PC's da bomb. You know why? Cause I said so :P
If they're da bomb, why do they waste so many CPU cycles for no reason? And they wear down and crash often too much.




Macs pwn. PCs suck.
Dude, my PC's never crashed. My dad's, my mom's, my brothers, and other brothers haven't. If people would stop loading all this crap on their computers, nothing would happen.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 18, 2004, 12:50:11 pm
I've tried "really fast" PCs, and they weren't much faster than this Dell.






Mac > PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 18, 2004, 01:01:43 pm
Quote
I've tried "really fast" PCs, and they weren't much faster than this Dell.






Mac > PC.
Where in my post did I mention ANYTHING about CPU speeds? It might help if you use something different than the same arguement every single time.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 18, 2004, 01:16:43 pm
Do you know how PCs crash?

Slow CPU speeds are a sign of crashes... PCs can't keep as stable as Macs... Which is why that Macs are faster, and Macs don't crash.


This topic is becoming really strange. Join in where the debate is taking place, and this topic won't be so hard to follow.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 18, 2004, 01:42:53 pm
Quote
I've tried "really fast" PCs, and they weren't much faster than this Dell.






Mac > PC.
How fast are "really fast" computers and what brand?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 18, 2004, 02:46:50 pm
Quote
Do you know how PCs crash?

Slow CPU speeds are a sign of crashes... PCs can't keep as stable as Macs... Which is why that Macs are faster, and Macs don't crash.


This topic is becoming really strange. Join in where the debate is taking place, and this topic won't be so hard to follow.
Once again, if people wouldn't load all the crap onto their computers, they wouldn't crash. I know many people who's PC never crashed.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 18, 2004, 02:59:19 pm
That's why you don't have many games on your comp. That is another result of crashing
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 18, 2004, 04:24:51 pm
Quote
How fast are "really fast" computers and what brand?
There's no exact speed, but again, an 800 Mhz Mac preforms much better than a 2-3 GHz PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 18, 2004, 06:30:19 pm
Read it (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112749,pg,1,00.asp).  I don't even need to comment on that.

1.  Don't say something like "MACS R00L YOU!" OR "PC ARE TEH KING".  That just makes you ignorant.
2.  There is a huge difference between a fast PC and a slow PC when you are using it for stuff other than solitaire and web browsing.  When you are playing games, compiling, encoding, doing graphics work, drafting, rendering, etc, there is a noticable difference between your average Dell and a custom built workstation or gaming rig.
3.  Right now, I consider a fast PC to be an Althon XP at 2.0 ghz or more, any Athlon 64, a Pentium 4 at 2.4 ghz or more, with 512mb or more of pc2700 or faster, and at least an fx5200 or a radeon 9200.  That would be the bottom of "fast computers" for me, and it happens to be the minimum recommended specs to run FarCry.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 18, 2004, 09:31:27 pm
Quote
Read it (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112749,pg,1,00.asp).  I don't even need to comment on that.

1.  Don't say something like "MACS R00L YOU!" OR "PC ARE TEH KING".  That just makes you ignorant.
2.  There is a huge difference between a fast PC and a slow PC when you are using it for stuff other than solitaire and web browsing.  When you are playing games, compiling, encoding, doing graphics work, drafting, rendering, etc, there is a noticable difference between your average Dell and a custom built workstation or gaming rig.
3.  Right now, I consider a fast PC to be an Althon XP at 2.0 ghz or more, any Athlon 64, a Pentium 4 at 2.4 ghz or more, with 512mb or more of pc2700 or faster, and at least an fx5200 or a radeon 9200.  That would be the bottom of "fast computers" for me, and it happens to be the minimum recommended specs to run FarCry.
I don't need to comment on that either, but for different reasons, most likely.

1.  I don't say that stuff, so... whatever.
2.  I do that sort of stuff on my Mac, so I know that.
3.  I consider a fast Mac to be around 1 GHz.  Something a little less is fine, and something more is a nice bonus.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 18, 2004, 09:42:25 pm
Quote
How fast are "really fast" computers and what brand?
Alienware Aurora, 2GB of RAM, and Western Digital RAID Array 10,000 RPM Hard Drives. It was very, very good in CS (http://www.counter-strike.net/), although it wasn't so stable... Booting wasn't quality of Mac... Cold... Hard... BOOTING UP...Terrible. Macs can just do things like booting, and keeping stable no matter what better.


Quote
That's why you don't have many games on your comp. That is another result of crashing

I don't have ANY games on my comp. I will soon...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 19, 2004, 06:51:10 am
I got a 2.0 GHZ and it's fast. It's never crashed sinceI've gotten it in June. I had an old Emachines from 5 years ago and it never crashed
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 19, 2004, 08:18:39 am
Have you ever used Mac OS X Diamond Web Dude?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 19, 2004, 11:20:21 am
My mom's school has them and I don't really like them...but thats what I use when I go over there
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 19, 2004, 12:53:05 pm
Which ones are they?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 20, 2004, 05:21:36 pm
Quote
Read it (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112749,pg,1,00.asp).  I don't even need to comment on that.

1.  Don't say something like "MACS R00L YOU!" OR "PC ARE TEH KING".  That just makes you ignorant.
2.  There is a huge difference between a fast PC and a slow PC when you are using it for stuff other than solitaire and web browsing.  When you are playing games, compiling, encoding, doing graphics work, drafting, rendering, etc, there is a noticable difference between your average Dell and a custom built workstation or gaming rig.
3.  Right now, I consider a fast PC to be an Althon XP at 2.0 ghz or more, any Athlon 64, a Pentium 4 at 2.4 ghz or more, with 512mb or more of pc2700 or faster, and at least an fx5200 or a radeon 9200.  That would be the bottom of "fast computers" for me, and it happens to be the minimum recommended specs to run FarCry.
Here's another rule don't compare you brand new PC to your 6 yearold Mac no duh it's fasterm, it's new.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 20, 2004, 05:56:47 pm
They're still going to be comparing badly.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 20, 2004, 07:00:18 pm
What 6 year old Mac?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 20, 2004, 07:59:26 pm
MEEP Has a 6 year old iMac and a lot newer hp Compaq.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 20, 2004, 08:05:44 pm
my moms school has 6 yr old macs but then they also have newer macs
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 20, 2004, 08:31:11 pm
Like 2 or 1 or 0 year old Macs? The new Macs are like the best ever. The OS X upgrade is unbelieveably stunning.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 20, 2004, 08:35:16 pm
1 or 2 years old...dunno which one
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 20, 2004, 08:43:27 pm
Mine's 2 years old.  It's terrific.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 20, 2004, 08:54:14 pm
My mom's Dell is 2 years old.

My dad's Power Mac G4 is 3 years old.

My dad's Mac is older, but better than the Dell.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 21, 2004, 07:58:40 am
Who wants to switch computers :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 08:10:40 am
What's that supposed to mean?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 21, 2004, 05:00:12 pm
Quote
Who wants to switch computers
I most certainly do not, thank you. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 21, 2004, 06:12:48 pm
Quote
MEEP Has a 6 year old iMac and a lot newer hp Compaq.
Um, my iMac is 4 years old. It's been trouble since the day I got it. It's always quiting programs when I'm in the middle of doing something. It freezes a lot when you tell it to do something and you have to restart it. One of my friends was using a recent Mac and couldn't get it to work. 1 hour later he found out he just had to restart it. The computer didn't say anything about it. In his own words, "I went in that house liking Mac and left hating them."
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 21, 2004, 06:18:29 pm
Quote
Quote
MEEP Has a 6 year old iMac and a lot newer hp Compaq.
Um, my iMac is 4 years old. It's been trouble since the day I got it. It's always quiting programs when I'm in the middle of doing something. It freezes a lot when you tell it to do something and you have to restart it. One of my friends was using a recent Mac and couldn't get it to work. 1 hour later he found out he just had to restart it. The computer didn't say anything about it. In his own words, "I went in that house liking Mac and left hating them."
Update to Mac OS X if you have the money it's well worth it, and also update your memory before switching to Mac OS X. It needs a mininum of 128MB and it works much better with 256mb.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 21, 2004, 06:20:33 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
MEEP Has a 6 year old iMac and a lot newer hp Compaq.
Um, my iMac is 4 years old. It's been trouble since the day I got it. It's always quiting programs when I'm in the middle of doing something. It freezes a lot when you tell it to do something and you have to restart it. One of my friends was using a recent Mac and couldn't get it to work. 1 hour later he found out he just had to restart it. The computer didn't say anything about it. In his own words, "I went in that house liking Mac and left hating them."
Update to Mac OS X if you have the money it's well worth it, and also update your memory before switching to Mac OS X. It needs a mininum of 128MB and it works much better with 256mb.
I don't plan on keeping the Mac much longer. How much is the update though. Sounds interesting.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 21, 2004, 06:27:37 pm
It's about $130 for panther, but you can get Jaguer for about $80. And memory is very cheap right now anyway so I'd atleast recomend upgrading memory. MAc OS X runs better with more memory. And it use's every kilobyte.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 21, 2004, 06:28:38 pm
It's more than worth it.  If you get OS X, your posts about you thinking that Macs suck will be over. :biggrin:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 21, 2004, 06:29:20 pm
Quote
It's about $130 for panther, but you can get Jaguer for about $80. And memory is very cheap right now anyway so I'd atleast recomend upgrading memory. MAc OS X runs better with more memory. And it use's every kilobyte.
My Mac started with 6.44 GB of memory. It's down to 4 something now.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 21, 2004, 06:35:09 pm
You mean hard drive space.  The new Macs have about 60-80 gigs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 21, 2004, 06:37:50 pm
Quote
You mean hard drive space.  The new Macs have about 60-80 gigs.
Oops, did I say memory? I meant HD space. My new one has 68 GB. Big difference.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 21, 2004, 06:55:28 pm
How muc memory do you have?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 21, 2004, 06:58:25 pm
Quote
How muc memory do you have?
Um, what's memory measured in?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 08:20:40 pm
My dad's G4 got 160GB of disk space.
My mom's Dell got like 40.


SAME PRICE WITHOUT MONITOR!


As for MEEP!, I think Rocko meant RAM.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 21, 2004, 08:47:26 pm
How about a pic of your desktop to show us
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 08:51:45 pm
I can't give you one. But it's a Dell Dimension 4500, Harmon Kardon 2.1 Speakers with Sub, Dell Keyboard (loud) Dell Mouse Ball (loud and uncomfortable to roll around) 16" CRT, Lexmark Z45 printer, 384K internet connection and modem, and that's it.


My dad's Power Mac G4 has Labtec 2.1 speakers, a 20" CRT, (old, but professional tuning) 384K internet modem and connection, Kensington Expert Trackball, (<-SWEET) Macally keyboard, (<-w00t, nice, quiet) Epson Stylus Csomething printer, and that's it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 21, 2004, 08:57:35 pm
My mom's compaq has 120 GB's of Hard drive space. It was about 600 dollars for everything but a monitor and printer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 08:58:50 pm
What else it got?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 21, 2004, 09:04:53 pm
Mesa need a pic of ya'lls mac screen
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 09:10:21 pm
You mean the monitor, or a screenshot? Look, I can't give you any pictures for awhile, OK?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 21, 2004, 09:13:45 pm
screenshot...just a screenshot
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 09:14:58 pm
I can get that in a couple of weeks... wait.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 21, 2004, 09:17:28 pm
Why? Whats with a couple of weeks? Grounded? :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 21, 2004, 09:24:39 pm
Nope, dad is in France.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 22, 2004, 11:20:27 am
Quote
My dad's G4 got 160GB of disk space.

You must have upgraded that or something. I looked up the top-of-the-line G4 and it had a 80GB HD.

Quote
As for MEEP!, I think Rocko meant RAM.

I think mine has 248 MB of RAM.

Quote
Nope, dad is in France.

Ok, why can't you take a screenshot while your dad's in France?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 22, 2004, 11:40:33 am
Quote
You must have upgraded that or something. I looked up the top-of-the-line G4 and it had a 80GB HD.

 
He must have custumed ordered it. You can do that you know.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 22, 2004, 09:45:11 pm
Here you go, ssj4gogita4

(http://a2032.g.akamai.net/7/2032/51/a9538e71610f6f/www.apple.com/macosx/images/indexcallouts10082003.jpg)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 22, 2004, 10:25:38 pm
Quote
Quote
My dad's G4 got 160GB of disk space.

You must have upgraded that or something. I looked up the top-of-the-line G4 and it had a 80GB HD.

Quote
As for MEEP!, I think Rocko meant RAM.

I think mine has 248 MB of RAM.

Quote
Nope, dad is in France.

Ok, why can't you take a screenshot while your dad's in France?
1. It's not top of the line. It's factory.

2. Mine has 512MB.

3. My Mac is at my dad's house, which is 250 miles away, and I can't get in!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongefanatic1992 on May 25, 2004, 07:46:42 pm
I really like Macs they are so much faster then PCS. Patrick 101 says that you guys are close minded. if you do like Macs get a g5  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 25, 2004, 09:04:39 pm
Yes, G5s are the best.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 26, 2004, 08:46:56 am
Hey Spongey, do you also hate Linux?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 26, 2004, 04:29:40 pm
Nah, Linux is okay.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 26, 2004, 08:59:07 pm
Same here. I like Debian a little.

Favorite OS: Mac OS X 10.3.3 (It PwnZ)
2nd: Mac OS 9.1 (Used since I was like 5 or 6)
3rd: Debian Linux (I picked up how to use it quickly)
4th: Windows XP (Not very good from the box, but projects are always Funz0rZ and its cool to see the speed after tweaking.)

That concludes my flaming.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 26, 2004, 09:14:18 pm
Quote
Favorite OS: Mac OS X 10.3.3 (It PwnZ)
haha.  I got 10.3.4 today. :tongue:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 26, 2004, 09:17:27 pm
It's out? Where?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 26, 2004, 09:26:16 pm
Don't you use Software Update?  Just download it from there... for some reason I can't find it on Apple's download page. :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 26, 2004, 09:31:50 pm
'Post a link to let me see where I can Download it.'
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 26, 2004, 09:46:50 pm
Uhh, Software Update is part of System Prefs. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 26, 2004, 09:49:14 pm
Dunno what you talkin' 'bout.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 26, 2004, 10:01:24 pm
(http://a1632.g.akamai.net/7/1632/51/0319ebc8c7a375/www.apple.com/macosx/features/systempreferences/images/systempreferences100303.jpg)
Software Update.  Click on it, and it should have 10.3.4 as one of the available downloads.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 29, 2004, 10:25:48 pm
This should be a poll.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 29, 2004, 10:34:31 pm
Windows would have it...just like SBC
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 29, 2004, 10:41:44 pm
Mac is still better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 29, 2004, 10:42:53 pm
Windows is more popular, no doubt.
Macs are better, no doubt.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 29, 2004, 10:47:52 pm
Linux should be added to the argument.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 29, 2004, 10:49:17 pm
Yeah, but it doesn't belong in this thread.  Somone could start an OS War thread if they want... or something like that.  We all know who'd win.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 29, 2004, 10:49:55 pm
Dude, Linux is the best out of teh 3. Linux WILL be bigger than Mac and Windows soon.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 29, 2004, 10:51:38 pm
I don't care about popularity.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 30, 2004, 06:54:07 am
The one thing about popularity is that the more popular you are, the more money you make. The more money you make, then they can sell them really cheap yet make a profit. If Linux continues to grow, they might put some companies out of business.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 08:10:51 am
Well, Mac should head up higher in sales soon, because of Jaguar. That's all what I figure. Linux won't throw Apple out of business.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 08:33:40 am
Mac won't go up in sale. Not many people are willing to pay 2,000 for a computer. Linux is going to end up being the next Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 09:01:44 am
They don't cost that much!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 09:10:13 am
Dude, they do. Go to http://www.apple.com (http://www.apple.com), and look at the computers there.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 09:32:25 am
You can get them for about 1,500.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 10:08:21 am
Quote
You can get them for about 1,500.
Oh, and that's a bargain?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 10:52:24 am
Well, they don't suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 11:13:35 am
Mine sure does. I was looking through my internet history and found a funny picture. I was not trying to do this.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 11:26:13 am
Quote
Linux is going to end up being the next Windows.
No they're not.  Linux doesn't suck.  Windows does.

Quote
Dude, they do. Go to http://www.apple.com (http://www.apple.com), and look at the computers there.
Why don't you?  Compare them to what you think to be a reasonable PC.  For an equal price, you can get a Mac so much better than a PC, it's not even funny.

Quote
If Linux continues to grow, they might put some companies out of business.
Linux can't put other companies out of business.  It's not a company, it's an OS, and it's not even owned by anyone.  However, Microsoft will continue to see there profits decrease, as people begin to realize the advantages of the products that Apple makes.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 11:32:18 am
Quote
Mine sure does. I was looking through my internet history and found a funny picture. I was not trying to do this.
That dosen't even make sense.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 11:34:01 am
Yeah, it doesn't.  And it looks like a pic of IE on Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 12:10:23 pm
It is...it is...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 12:13:32 pm
Exactly.  That's what I don't get.  He was saying that Macs suck, and then shows a pic from Windows...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 12:18:50 pm
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Macs are cool but PCs are like...da bomb-diggity
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 12:20:09 pm
What doesn't make sense about what I put?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 12:21:17 pm
Quote
Exactly.  That's what I don't get.  He was saying that Macs suck, and then shows a pic from Windows...
What he said...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 12:27:08 pm
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 12:27:48 pm
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
It's 4, and it's been a problem since I got it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 12:28:11 pm
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
You're comparing your top-of-the-line Mac to a crappy PC, so I wouldn't be talking...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 12:28:23 pm
mine hasnt crashed at all yet...going on 6 yrs old
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 12:30:38 pm
As I've said before, my family has an 8 year old PC and it never crashed. We had to move it recently because of lack of space.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 12:33:33 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
You're comparing your top-of-the-line Mac to a crappy PC, so I wouldn't be talking...
My Mac is not "Top of the line". I'm comparing 2 Computers the same age and price, so I wouldn't be talking.
THIS IS NO TYPO.
1.25 GHz Apple Quicksilver G4: $2,200, Released July 2001, Running Mac OS X 10.3.
2.4 GHz Dell Dimension 4500: $1,950, Released 2002, Running Windows XP Home.
1.25 GHz Apple Quicksilver G4: Never had a problem with it running OS X. Very fast, good for all sorts of software.
2.4 GHz Dell Dimension 4500: Stability: 0. Speed: 0. Software compatibility: 0.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 12:38:58 pm
Hmmm...

eMac: $999
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
256MB DDR333 SDRAM
17" LCD
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive

Gateway Profile: $1049
256MB memory 
15" LCD 
40GB HD 
Integrated CD-ROM



Macs.  Cheaper.  Better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 12:48:47 pm
See?
PWN3D![/size]
LMAO.



PS Spongey the eMac has a CRT. Built in.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 12:51:08 pm
Quote
Hmmm...

eMac: $999
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
256MB DDR333 SDRAM
17" LCD
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive

Gateway Profile: $1049
256MB memory 
15" LCD 
40GB HD 
Integrated CD-ROM



Macs.  Cheaper.  Better.
Dude, you're comparing it to a Gateway. It HAS to be better than the Gateway. If you knew what smart people do, is build their own PC. You can customize it, and save a LOT of money.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 12:53:27 pm
That Mac wasn't custom-built. :mf_zippy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 12:54:53 pm
Not many people know how to build a custom computer.  Congrats to the smart people that do.  But we're debating about standard stuff on the market here.  If you want a good computer, you don't have to build one.  Just get a Mac.  And without OS X, custom computers are just as bad as other PCs.  What's the point of having a good computer but not a good OS?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 30, 2004, 01:30:57 pm
Quote
Hmmm...

eMac: $999
1.25GHz PowerPC G4
256MB DDR333 SDRAM
17" LCD
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive

Gateway Profile: $1049
256MB memory 
15" LCD 
40GB HD 
Integrated CD-ROM



Macs.  Cheaper.  Better.
WTF???...  :glare:

For $850

Amd 2500+
 17 lcd monitor
nividia 128mb 5200 video card (not the best but is good enough 4 me)
512mb ddr sdram
A burner
a floppy dirve
everything intigrated xcept video

and besides is the mac proseser AMD?

MAN! im in a lazy moode

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 01:34:36 pm
Uhh, any Mac processor will easily out preform any PC one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 01:40:23 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
It's 4, and it's been a problem since I got it.
You run an old OS on it. OS 9.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 02:03:25 pm
eMachines: $489
2.0Ghz
80GB harddrive
512MB ram
dvd/cd burner
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 03:11:26 pm
Who makes the processor?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:12:08 pm
eMachines - Windows
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 03:15:29 pm
Not the OS, the processor.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 03:18:56 pm
Yeah, like Apple makes the G5 (with IBM).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:20:02 pm
AMD Ashlon XP
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 03:21:12 pm
AMDs are the best processors out there.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:21:38 pm
Quote
AMDs are the best processors out there.
You heard it with your own eyes :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 03:22:12 pm
AMD makes good processors. IBM makes better processors with Apple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:22:42 pm
whatever. I'll admit IBM is cool
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 03:50:03 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
It's 4, and it's been a problem since I got it.
You run an old OS on it. OS 9.
Yes, but at the time i got it, it was the most recent. I admit, I haven't tried the newest Mac, but I don't want it turning into a piece of junk like the one I already have. I would give it a try, but
VVVV

Quote
1.25 GHz Apple Quicksilver G4: $2,200

Um, most people can't afford a computer like that.

Quote
2.4 GHz Dell Dimension 4500: Stability: 0. Speed: 0. Software compatibility: 0.
That's opinion and not fact. I haven't tryed the OS 10, but I'm sticking with something that works for me.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:51:30 pm
Mine is da best :P although more memory would just screw it up
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 03:51:40 pm
OS X will work for anyone and everyone.  And a lot better than Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 03:52:30 pm
If you buy a pre-made PC, you're ripping yourself off. Even if it's Mac has the greatest computers in the world, I still am not going to pay 2200 dollars for a stinking computer, when I can get everything I need for less than half of that.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:54:04 pm
2200 is way too expensive. 1500 or less isnt that bad...I got mine for under 500
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 03:54:18 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Mine sure does.
Yours is like 5 years old!!!
It's 4, and it's been a problem since I got it.
You run an old OS on it. OS 9.
Yes, but at the time i got it, it was the most recent. I admit, I haven't tried the newest Mac, but I don't want it turning into a piece of junk like the one I already have. I would give it a try, but
VVVV

Quote
1.25 GHz Apple Quicksilver G4: $2,200

Um, most people can't afford a computer like that.

Quote
2.4 GHz Dell Dimension 4500: Stability: 0. Speed: 0. Software compatibility: 0.
That's opinion and not fact. I haven't tryed the OS 10, but I'm sticking with something that works for me.
1. Just upgrade the OS. You don't need a new computer.
2. Whatever.
3. Not opinion, I know that it sucks because I am USING IT RIGHT NOW AND IT CAN'T KEEP UP WITH MAC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 03:56:02 pm
Quote
1. Just upgrade the OS. You don't need a new computer.
2. Whatever.
3. Not opinion, I know that it sucks because I am USING IT RIGHT NOW AND IT CAN'T KEEP UP WITH MAC.
1. Too late now.
2. You didn't feel like answering.
3. Again, opinion instead of fact.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 03:56:41 pm
Wow.  People really don't listen, do they?
They say Macs are too expensive.
I say no, your wrong, and back it up with a good example.
Then what do they do?  They say Macs are too expensive... :dry:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:56:55 pm
LOL! I'm laughing at meep's answers at number 3 :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 03:57:16 pm
Dude, Windows has all the programs I need. I know Macs do have better video editing software. I just don't need it, since I really don't feel like paying $500 for a digital camcorder.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:58:03 pm
who needs a camcorder when you got WinTV :P and DVDs :D
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 03:58:35 pm
Quote
LOL! I'm laughing at meep's answers at number 3
Yeah, me too.  When people are constantly wrong, it either gets annoying or funny.

Quote
who needs a camcorder when you got WinTV :P and DVDs :D
Uh, maybe the people that like to make movies, burn DVDs, and take advantage of Apple's great media editing software...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 03:59:28 pm
Its kinda amusing at watching the posts then actually posting for a change
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 03:59:32 pm
Macs are great computers, I never said they weren't. But I still won't pay $1,500 or more for a computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:01:35 pm
the first ever apple computer is da bomb :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:02:27 pm
Quote
Macs are great computers, I never said they weren't. But I still won't pay $1,500 or more for a computer.
You don't have to.  And you're forgetting that there are lots of PCs that cost that much, or even more.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:03:01 pm
Quote
Quote
1. Just upgrade the OS. You don't need a new computer.
2. Whatever.
3. Not opinion, I know that it sucks because I am USING IT RIGHT NOW AND IT CAN'T KEEP UP WITH MAC.
1. Too late now.
2. You didn't feel like answering.
3. Again, opinion instead of fact.
1. Don't like trying stuff, huh?
2. As you say, master.
3. That's an opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:03:06 pm
Yes, I know that. But I can still get a very nice one for much cheaper than if I were to go to Best Buy.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:03:55 pm
Best Buy is evil.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:04:25 pm
Best Buy has good deals!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:05:23 pm
Good for you.  Do those computers have Mac OS X on it? No.  That's what really matters.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:05:42 pm
Quote
Best Buy has good deals!
.....

My Economics teacher bought a PC for $2,000 there. That's a ripoff.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:07:32 pm
Any PC is a rip-off.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:07:35 pm
maybe your teacher didnt have rebates or didnt find the right one. There are PCs cheaper than that
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:09:01 pm
Quote
Any PC is a rip-off.
Word. My mom got this Dell for like $2,000!!!!1
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:09:24 pm
Macs are 2200! Even worse! lol
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:11:27 pm
Dude.  No.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:12:01 pm
Quote
Macs are 2200! Even worse! lol
Well, it dosen't suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:12:37 pm
Dude, you guys are calling PC-fans close minded, yet you Mac fans seem to be the real closed-minders.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:13:30 pm
You don't know what you are talking about. I have used more Windows AND Mac than you.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:13:55 pm
Yeah, you don't.  Maybe I've used both OS X and XP, whereas you used OS 9 all those years ago, and think Macs suck.  That's what's close minded.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:15:20 pm
Yes, I do. I've even said Macs are good, so you can't say I'm close minded. You 2 just keep saying PC's suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:16:51 pm
No.  Go back to my very first post in this thread.  I back everything up, until no one listesn, and then it just gets old.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:16:59 pm
Because they do suck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:17:51 pm
Quote
Because they do suck.
......

Have you even used a good PC? You just seem to be basing everything off of your crappy Dell.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:18:34 pm
if you dont like PCs get a Mac
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:19:06 pm
Quote
Have you even used a good PC? You just seem to be basing everything off of your crappy Dell.
Uh, there are no good PCs...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:19:52 pm
yup. Dells are PCs...stop using your Dell and get a Mac...or just stop posting
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:20:06 pm
Yes there are. I bet you my PC could do anything your Mac could do, with the exception of video editing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:20:43 pm
haha. I second that. Mine too
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 30, 2004, 04:21:41 pm
Quote
Uhh, any Mac processor will easily out preform any PC one.
A mac needs 2 prossesors to be 64 bit. the g5 one i mean


And how doe's it I NEED PROOF!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:22:08 pm
Quote
I bet you my PC could do anything your Mac could do, with the exception of video editing.
Can yours not a get a virus without downloading all this other crap?

Quote
A mac needs 2 prossesors to be 64 bit. the g5 one i mean


And how doe's it I NEED PROOF!!!
Uh, it's called a dual processor.  Which makes it better.  And I've given lots of proof.  You obviously haven't listened.  If you want more, go to Apple's G5 site.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:22:22 pm
proof would be the correct word I was thinking
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:22:54 pm
Yes, it can. A vast majority of Windows virus you have to download an infected file, I.E. an attachment from someone you don't know.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:23:25 pm
Quote
yup. Dells are PCs...stop using your Dell and get a Mac...or just stop posting
My mom wants to keep this piece of crap. I gotta use this until I can go back.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:24:05 pm
Aww, you poor thing. Oh well, you stuck with a dell. LOL
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:24:39 pm
Quote
Quote
yup. Dells are PCs...stop using your Dell and get a Mac...or just stop posting
My mom wants to keep this piece of crap. I gotta use this until I can go back.
If you hate it so much, why do you use it?  :dry:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:28:00 pm
It's the only computer around... That I can use...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:28:15 pm
..... You don't need to use a computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:28:43 pm
Yeah I do.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:29:15 pm
not really...there are other things
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:29:39 pm
Quote
Yeah I do.
No. It's not required to live.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:32:19 pm
Not much to do other than the computer in my life... Nothing to do.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:33:11 pm
1)tv
2)eat somewhere
3)hang out with friends
4)long naps
5)homework
6)school
7)sports
8)helping parents
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:33:41 pm
PC users don't have that much to look forward to when it comes to computers.
But Mac users can't get enough of quality computer usage.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:33:59 pm
Quote
1)tv
2)eat somewhere
3)hang out with friends
4)long naps
5)homework
6)school
7)sports
8)helping parents
He's got you there.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 04:34:16 pm
Quote
Yeah I do.
 :mellow:  There is life beyond the computer.

Quote
Not much to do other than the computer in my life... Nothing to do.
You should go outside or something. Experience fresh air.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:34:30 pm
DUDE! Macs can do those things mention above also just like PC users
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:36:04 pm
I do 6, 5, 3, 2, and 1. But when I 3 I usually 3 on the computer. Counter-Strike Lans.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:37:32 pm
Quote
I do 6, 5, 3, 2, and 1. But when I 3 I usually 3 on the computer. Counter-Strike Lans.
You lost me with your hip young lingo there son! I 3 I got me confuzed...maybe I'm not reading it right
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:39:10 pm
3= Hang out with friends, as in the index of things to do besides the internet.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:39:53 pm
Quote
Counter-Strike Lans.
Which goes on computers. Why don't you just go to the movies with friends?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 30, 2004, 04:40:45 pm
Yeah, plenty other things.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:40:48 pm
ah. forgot movies :P also driving or mall or something like that. Go watch a game outside
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 04:43:02 pm
You can play sports.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 04:43:17 pm
Can't see any movies. Driving? I'm 11. I would go to the mall, which takes me to the Apple Store. I play handball sometimes.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:44:51 pm
Quote
Can't see any movies. Driving? I'm 11. I would go to the mall, which takes me to the Apple Store. I play handball sometimes.
Why cant you see movies? Dont go to the apple store. Go somewhere else. Handball rox :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 30, 2004, 04:45:31 pm
Get a life outside of computers! JEBUS!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:46:16 pm
PatrickStarr is funny :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 04:48:06 pm
Quote
I would go to the mall, which takes me to the Apple Store.
Meaning you're obssessed.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:49:00 pm
LOL @ KEVIN!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 30, 2004, 04:51:30 pm
What, Kevin IS Right.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 04:52:44 pm
Go Kevin! Go Kevin! It's your bday! It's your bday! :) I'm laughing so hard right now
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:24:57 pm
I'm just staring at the screen.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:25:50 pm
still no life eh? :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:27:46 pm
This ain't McDonald's SSJ4.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:28:16 pm
I'm at home...not McDonalds. Sorry.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:29:33 pm
This topic is becoming stupid.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:30:05 pm
so why do you keep posting. Spongey34 usually has debates. He's away though
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 05:31:53 pm
Spongey34 makes intelligent debate. Yet you on the other hand, just base everything off of opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:33:29 pm
**Flame suit on!**
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:34:28 pm
Dont flame dude. We're just trying to have a debate here but without Spongey34...it's kinda pointless
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:36:52 pm
What's there to say in this thread now?  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:37:26 pm
That you should stop talking :lol: j/k...we can still debate it's just kevin and I will win everytime
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:40:42 pm
You don't even have a clue.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:41:05 pm
wanna try?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:41:51 pm
Wanna try what?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:42:26 pm
try to win the war and battle
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:43:45 pm
Flame war?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:45:00 pm
that too...but we may get banned :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 30, 2004, 05:46:33 pm
BRING IT!
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 30, 2004, 05:47:06 pm
WHO CARES!!


Um, Maybe Not....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 05:47:34 pm
BTW, I thought you said you werent coming anymore...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 30, 2004, 08:10:23 pm
I think that 9 posts of Patrick101's on this page are useless. :dry: Let's get back to computers.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 08:23:03 pm
PCs rules and you know it
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 08:24:06 pm
They're both good, but the fact that you need to be a neurologist in order to afford a mac is why I'm not going to get one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongemonkey13 on May 30, 2004, 08:36:35 pm
i think that computers are cool almost as cool as me and as for this topic. its the same things being repeated over and over
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 08:51:32 pm
The debate master (or whatever you guys call me) has returned! :biggrin:

Uh, I know I back up all my posts, but just because patrick101 doesn't doesn't mean he's wrong.  It's not arguing if you're stating the facts.  And the fact is Macs are better than PCs.  I know everyone's entitled to their own opinion, I'm just here to prove them wrong.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 30, 2004, 08:54:51 pm
Quote
And the fact is Macs are better than PCs.
That's pure opinion. Seriously, Macs cost more. -1 point to apple. You can't run as much software. -1 point. You have to buy direct from Apple. -1 point.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 08:58:04 pm
how much harddrive and RAM you got?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 09:47:22 pm
Quote
That's pure opinion.
Wrong.
Quote
Seriously, Macs cost more.
Wrong.
Quote
You can't run as much software.
Wrong.
Quote
You have to buy direct from Apple.
That's a good thing.  If other people started making Macs, they wouldn't be as good.  Apple know's what they're doing.


 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 09:50:49 pm
Quote
Quote
That's pure opinion.
Wrong.
Quote
Seriously, Macs cost more.
Wrong.
Quote
You can't run as much software.
Wrong.
Quote
You have to buy direct from Apple.
That's a good thing.  If other people started making Macs, they wouldn't be as good.  Apple know's what they're doing.
opinion is right

macs cost more is right...2200? poop on that

dunno about software

<$500 is way better
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 30, 2004, 10:00:50 pm
Quote
macs cost more is right...2200? poop on that
I have no clue where you people are getting that from...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2004, 10:02:29 pm
Somewhere back there...i dunno where though
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:09:36 am
Dude, a Mac costs anywhere from 1500 up. That's a lot of money.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on May 31, 2004, 08:35:34 am
No Kevin, $800 up. eMac Combo Drive is 800.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 31, 2004, 09:22:28 am
my emachines was $489
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on May 31, 2004, 10:01:08 am
Quote
Quote
macs cost more is right...2200? poop on that
I have no clue where you people are getting that from...
Patrick101 said his Mac costs that much.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 10:22:56 am
That's fine.  That means he actual has a good computer.  But it doesn't mean that all Macs cost that much.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 31, 2004, 05:10:04 pm
Quote
Quote
I bet you my PC could do anything your Mac could do, with the exception of video editing.
Can yours not a get a virus without downloading all this other crap?

Quote
A mac needs 2 prossesors to be 64 bit. the g5 one i mean


And how doe's it I NEED PROOF!!!
Uh, it's called a dual processor.  Which makes it better.  And I've given lots of proof.  You obviously haven't listened.  If you want more, go to Apple's G5 site.
AND MACS STILL USE ISA 16 BIT SLOTS


AND MACS NEED DUAL PROSESORS TO MAKE IT 64 BIT

That's a good thing. If other people started making Macs, they wouldn't be as good. Apple know's what they're doing.

Pfft thats why macs cost so much, YOU ARE RIGHT
microsoft has not been very sucessful they fail at a lot of things thats why they use other ppls things  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:18:53 pm
Quote
Pfft thats why macs cost so much
For the *I've lost count* time, Macs do not "cost so much." :dry:  :angry:
People... get a life if you can't listen and face the facts.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:19:16 pm
kids, it's all about what you want to do with your computer. people buy what suits them the best.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:20:20 pm
And if you want a good computer, a Mac suits you the best.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:23:45 pm
Quote
Quote
Pfft thats why macs cost so much
For the *I've lost count* time, Macs do not "cost so much." :dry:  :angry:
People... get a life if you can't listen and face the facts.
Macs may not cost much for you and your brain surgeon parents, but some of us don't want to spend that much for a computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:24:58 pm
windows is good. there is alot of things you can do with windows that you can't do with macs.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:29:33 pm
Quote
Macs may not cost much for you and your brain surgeon parents, but some of us don't want to spend that much for a computer.
Maybe computers that suck are okay for you and other clueless people, but some of us actualy have something good.

Quote
windows is good. there is alot of things you can do with windows that you can't do with macs.
Macs are great.  There are a lot of things you can do with Mac OS X that Windows doesn't even come close to, and never will.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:35:01 pm
ok i was watching some of the special features on my lord of the rings DVD and i noticed that they were making things for the movie on a PC. I happened to be a dell.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 05:35:45 pm
For The Last Time, He Did Not Say Macs Are Bad! He Is Just Saying That There Is Nothing Wrong With PCs Either!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:38:58 pm
Quote
ok i was watching some of the special features on my lord of the rings DVD and i noticed that they were making things for the movie on a PC. I happened to be a dell.
All good movies are made with Macs.  No, I'm not making that up.
Quote
There Is Nothing Wrong With PCs
Wow.  That's hilarious.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 05:42:35 pm
Spongey34, Now Your Just Getting Stupid.....


Anyway, Who Would Wanna Hack A Mac?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:42:36 pm
Quote
Quote
ok i was watching some of the special features on my lord of the rings DVD and i noticed that they were making things for the movie on a PC. I happened to be a dell.
All good movies are made with Macs.  No, I'm not making that up.
Quote
There Is Nothing Wrong With PCs
Wow.  That's hilarious.
Dude, you've said P.C.'s have more viruses. You want to know why? Since it'd be pointless for the virus writers to write viruses for Macs. It'd be like releasing a deadly virus on Edmond, Oklahoma. There's basically no one there, so hardly anyone would get infected.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:46:04 pm
Quote
Spongey34, Now Your Just Getting Stupid...
No, it's just that everyone else has been stupid...

Quote
Dude, you've said P.C.'s have more viruses. You want to know why? Since it'd be pointless for the virus writers to write viruses for Macs. It'd be like releasing a deadly virus on Edmond, Oklahoma. There's basically no one there, so hardly anyone would get infected.
No.
"Windows proponents are quick to bring up the "security through obscurity" argument. That goes something like "If Apple or Linux was on top like Microsoft is right now, they'd have the same problems". This is the single biggest misconception that Windows users have these days, and nothing is further form the truth.

First of all, if there was any viruses, worms or spyware for OS X and/or Linux, they would have a VERY hard time not only installing themselves on a user's machine, they would also have a hard time propagating. All of the UNIX-based OS'es ask for some type of admin or root password before messing with things at the system level.

Let's suppose someone wrote a virus for OS X (which in all honesty probably wouldn't be that hard). They might pass it off through email, and let's say it lands in the inbox of a novice Mac user. They look at the email and there's an attachment. It looks intriguing, even though the user doesn't recognize the sender's address, so the user double-clicks on it. Realizing it's a program (or perhaps an AppleScript that touches sensitive permissions) OS X will prompt the user to enter the Administrative username and password. Not knowing what this program is, the user would have to be very foolish the do so.

This is security at the very simplest. It's not that hard folks! Microsoft just seems to have too many things going on, too many eggs in one basket, too much focus on money rather than keeping things simple, any one of a thousand other reasons to not make things simple and secure."

... that's why.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:47:56 pm
Quote
Not knowing what this program is, the user would have to be very foolish the do so.
......

That's exactly how a vast majority of Windows viruses work.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:48:32 pm
Quote
Quote
ok i was watching some of the special features on my lord of the rings DVD and i noticed that they were making things for the movie on a PC. I happened to be a dell.
All good movies are made with Macs.  No, I'm not making that up.
Quote
There Is Nothing Wrong With PCs
Wow.  That's hilarious.
err i hate this whole topic.  

so your saying lord of the rings isn't good because they used pc's?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:48:38 pm
Quote
That's exactly how a vast majority of Windows viruses work.
No.  You're obviously missing the whole point.

Quote
so your saying lord of the rings isn't good because they used pc's?
No, I'm not.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:50:09 pm
Quote
Quote
That's exactly how a vast majority of Windows viruses work.
No.  You're obviously missing the whole point.
No, I'm not. A vast majority of Windows viruses you have to open an attachment from someone you dont know.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:51:10 pm
very true IZ.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:51:57 pm
Quote
No, I'm not. A vast majority of Windows viruses you have to open an attachment from someone you dont know.
No kidding, but that's not the whole point.  It was an example.  "OS X will prompt the user to enter the Administrative username and password."  That's the whole point.  Windows doesn't make you do that.  Hackers are smart and they know that.  That's why more viruses are made for Windows, simply because they will actually work (which is a bad thing).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:52:07 pm
And on a side note, this thread is about Macs v. PC's. Not Mac v. Windows!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:53:08 pm
hackers are dumb! if they were smart they wouldn't try to hack.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:53:35 pm
Quote
And on a side note, this thread is about Macs v. PC's. Not Mac v. Windows!
Tell that to yourself.  You're the one who brought this argument up.  And it looks like you're pretty eager to end it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 05:53:46 pm
So My Dads Computer Sucks?

His computer

800 gig of space.
768 Of RAM
240 AMD Opteron
2x DVD Burner
19 Flat Screen Moniter
Asuse SK8N Motherboard
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:54:50 pm
Quote
So My Dads Computer Sucks?

His computer

800 gig of space.
768 Of RAM
240 AMD Opteron
2x DVD Burner
19 Flat Screen Moniter
Asuse SK8N Motherboard
thats an awesome computer!  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:55:36 pm
What? You're the one who's comparing an top-of-the-line Mac to a Gateway. IT's kind of like comparing the Pope to a convict.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 05:56:30 pm
Quote
hackers are dumb! if they were smart they wouldn't try to hack.
Actually, they're pretty smart.  I'd like to see someone try to do what they're doing.  They know a lot of systems and other things that you people don't.

Quote
So My Dads Computer Sucks?
Actually, I never said it did, but with Windows, I'm sure it does compared to mine.

Quote
What? You're the one who's comparing an top-of-the-line Mac to a Gateway. IT's kind of like comparing the Pope to a convict.
You've gotta be kidding.  Everytime I do a comparison, I use two eaually priced computers.  I even use a more expensive PC, but of course, the Mac is better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 05:57:24 pm
post your specs spongey34.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 05:57:48 pm
Quote
Quote
hackers are dumb! if they were smart they wouldn't try to hack.
Actually, they're pretty smart.  I'd like to see someone try to do what they're doing.  They know a lot of systems and other things that you people don't.

Quote
So My Dads Computer Sucks?
Actually, I never said it did, but with Windows, I'm sure it does compared to mine.
No it doesn't. You've never used a good P.C., so shut your mouth.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 05:58:06 pm
Yes Please Do.



And Your Computer Will Come No Where Close And You Know It!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:00:54 pm
Quote
No it doesn't. You've never used a good P.C., so shut your mouth.
Yes I have.  You're the one who thinks Macs suck because you used them a long time ago when they weren't half as good as they are now.  Shut up.

Quote
And Your Computer Will Come No Where Close And You Know It!
Yes, I do know that mine is far better than yours.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:02:14 pm
Here Are Some Facts...

Q: What does a MAC and an elephant have in common?  
A: They're both big, bulky, slow, fat, and grey.

Q: A high performance MAC and and a high performance IBM are in a store display window. A customer walks into the store. Which one does he choose?  
A: The high performance IBM. There is no such thing as a high performance MAC.

Q: What do you call 50 Macs falling out of an airplane?
A: Air pollution.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:02:22 pm
Quote
Quote
No it doesn't. You've never used a good P.C., so shut your mouth.
Yes I have.  You're the one who thinks Macs suck because you used them a long time ago when they weren't half as good as they are now.  Shut up.

Quote
And Your Computer Will Come No Where Close And You Know It!
Yes, I do know that mine is far better than yours.
II NEVER SAID MACS SUCK! I EVEN SAID THEY WERE GOOD! STOP PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:02:44 pm
give pc some respect then. and post your specs.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 31, 2004, 06:03:26 pm
Okay. I'm giving ya'll a challenge. Spongey and Kevin, I want you both to find me the best computer you can find between $700 and $1,000. Good luck.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 31, 2004, 06:04:30 pm
If you use a PC and you think it sux, don't use it anymore.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:04:53 pm
Quote
Here Are Some Facts...

Q: What does a MAC and an elephant have in common?  
A: They're both big, bulky, slow, fat, and grey.

Q: A high performance MAC and and a high performance IBM are in a store display window. A customer walks into the store. Which one does he choose?  
A: The high performance IBM. There is no such thing as a high performance MAC.

Q: What do you call 50 Macs falling out of an airplane?
A: Air pollution.
that made me laugh real hard man. SPongey and IZ take the challenge!  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:05:07 pm
Sorry, PatrickStarr2k3, but that was THE stupidest post I've ever read.  It wasn't even funny like your other stupid ones.  Stupid.

Quote
I NEVER SAID MACS SUCK! I EVEN SAID THEY WERE GOOD! STOP PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH!
I wasn't even talking to you, and you've been the one putting words in my mouth.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 31, 2004, 06:06:08 pm
I hope you're doing my challenge. Post the URL too.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:07:08 pm
are you taking the challenge?  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:07:21 pm
Quote
Quote
No it doesn't. You've never used a good P.C., so shut your mouth.
Yes I have.  You're the one who thinks Macs suck because you used them a long time ago when they weren't half as good as they are now.  Shut up.

Quote
And Your Computer Will Come No Where Close And You Know It!
Yes, I do know that mine is far better than yours.
Well, considering you quoted me, I'd take it you were.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:08:15 pm
Quote
are you taking the challenge?
Sure, but it won't matter.  IZlover's computer will have Windows on it, and mine will have Mac OS X.  Thus, mine will be better, regardless of the specs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:08:41 pm
Quote
Sorry, PatrickStarr2k3, but that was THE stupidest post I've ever read.  It wasn't even funny like your other stupid ones.  Stupid.
But The Post Is True.........


I Never Said It Was Funny......
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:09:15 pm
no it won't. specs tell all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:09:53 pm
.....

He's not talking about my freaking computer. He's talking about my dad's. Macs are not worth the money they are charging.
Sure, but it won't matter.  IZlover's computer will have Windows on it, and mine will have Mac OS X.  Thus, mine will be better, regardless of the specs. Mac OS X isn't as great as you say it is. So get off your freaking high horse and realize, you're the same as everyone else.
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:10:19 pm
Quote
But The Post Is True...
Okay, now THAT was funny.  Seriously, if you or anyone else thinks that's true, you have major problems.  I'm not joking.  I'm scared knowing that you truly believe that.  I really am.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 31, 2004, 06:11:08 pm
Quote
Quote
are you taking the challenge?
Sure, but it won't matter.  IZlover's computer will have Windows on it, and mine will have Mac OS X.  Thus, mine will be better, regardless of the specs.
Windows has never given me problems on my XP. So I can't say I know what you're talking about. Maybe you're putting junk on it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:12:15 pm
Quote
Mac OS X isn't as great as you say it is. So get off your freaking high horse and realize, you're the same as everyone else.
Yeah, it's a lot better than I say it is.  I'm not the same as everyone, because I'm actual smart enough to have something good.
Quote
Maybe you're putting junk on it.
Putting junk on what?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:12:16 pm
so are both of you up for the challenge? yes. no.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:13:53 pm
XP Has Done Absoluetly No Wrong For Me.


Your Just Downloading Crap And Thinking Windows Is Letting It In.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on May 31, 2004, 06:14:02 pm
Quote
Putting junk on what?
On your Dell. (You're the one with the dell right?)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:15:41 pm
Quote
Quote
Mac OS X isn't as great as you say it is. So get off your freaking high horse and realize, you're the same as everyone else.
Yeah, it's a lot better than I say it is.  I'm not the same as everyone, because I'm actual smart enough to have something good.
I'm smart enough too. The reasons you say are bologna. I looked up a Macintosh laptop, and the cheapest one was for 1,200. For a 12" screen! That's freaking crazy! And you keep saying Macs are the same amount as P.C.'s, well that's wrong. Mine was $300, and could easily PWN any 2,000 Dell.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:17:51 pm
Kevin, The 300 Is Including Your Case Too.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:21:50 pm
Xp has been good to me. oh and read this click (http://terhune.net/jokes/MACC1.html)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:22:04 pm
Quote
(You're the one with the dell right?)
No, that's patrick101.

Quote
I looked up a Macintosh laptop, and the cheapest one was for 1,200.
No, it's not.

Quote
Kevin, The 300 Is Including Your Case Too.
Uhh, Sean said between $700 and $1000.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:23:34 pm
Quote
Quote
(You're the one with the dell right?)
No, that's patrick101.

Quote
I looked up a Macintosh laptop, and the cheapest one was for 1,200.
No, it's not.

Quote
Kevin, The 300 Is Including Your Case Too.
Uhh, Sean said between $700 and $1000.
Sorry, my mistake. It was 1,600.
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/70402/wo/CN2sV2brU8eI2VIxPp9JwZWXKMg/0.0.7.1.0.5.21.1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0)

I was talking about my P.C. , not about what he said.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:23:42 pm
Hello? This Is HIS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:31:28 pm
In response to this (http://terhune.net/jokes/MACC1.html) which was totally false, whereas this is based on facts:
1).  No they don't.
2).  Right on the keyboard.
3).  No, you can buy one with two buttons.
4).  Right at the top of the keyboard, just like any other computer.
5).  They are much faster than PCs.
6).  Lots of people make software for them.
7).  Lots of multi-tasking.
8).  Smart men use UNIX.
9).  Macs don't crash.
10). Last year, Mac released Mac OS 10.3.  In five years, Microsoft will release something attempting to be as good as it.
11). Yes they are.
12). That's a good thing.
13). They're way more powerful.
14). No it doesn't.
15). Steve Jobs.  The person Bill Gates got all his ideas from.
16). Shut Down...
17). No it doesn't.
18). No, it has a lot more.
19). No you can't.
20). No it doesn't.
21). No they don't.
22). Yes they do.
23). Yes they would, if they're smart.
24). People who use Macs get a better education.
25). No they don't.

Quote
Sorry, my mistake. It was 1,600.
Nope, wrong again.  It's not that hard...
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:33:24 pm
Lot Of "No It Doesn't"'s Dont You Think?


Are "No It Doesn't"'s Facts?


Did Not Think So.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:34:46 pm
Uhh, why don't you read what I was responding to.  It might make more sense.  And I said everything was based on facts.

Some people are real stupid...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:34:49 pm
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0)

RIGHT THERE SPONGEY34!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:35:45 pm
"Not Found
The requested URL /1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0 was not found on this server.


Apache/1.3.27 Server at store.apple.com Port 80"

... of course.  Right there.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:35:54 pm
the link doesn't work IZ.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:36:38 pm
So Spongey34, Your Calling Yourself Smarter Than A Business.


Thats A Good One!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:37:05 pm
Sorry.

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/70402/wo/CN2sV2brU8eI2VIxPp9JwZWXKMg/0.0.7.1.0.5.21.1.1.1.1.0.0.1.0)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:37:24 pm
Quote
Your Calling Yourself Smarter Than A Business.
haha, no.  I'm not.  Learn to read.  And I can easily start my own business too, if you want.

IZlover, that's still wrong...
Apple's cheapest notebooks aren't $1,599.  Try $500 less.  Big difference.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:38:50 pm
I could too..... My parents would never let me though...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:38:58 pm
Plus! Businesses Wanna Make Money, Not Lose It By buying Macs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:40:19 pm
Maybe I don't need to buy one because I already have one...
And I wouldn't lose money.  It would pay off in the long run.  Believe me.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:41:20 pm
For The WHOLE Business, That Means Everyone Not Just Yourself.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:43:11 pm
Dude, know what you're talking about.  I'm not even gonna respond to that.

Oh, and I'm not the only one who thinks different.  "If you have a small business, get a Mac. There’s no question about it."-Richard Ziskin
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:43:47 pm
Am I The Only One Who Does Not Know Who He Is?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 06:44:25 pm
Quote
Dude, know what you're talking about.  I'm not even gonna respond to that.

Oh, and I'm not the only one who thinks different.  "If you have a small business, get a Mac. There?s no question about it."-Richard Ziskin
Small business being the keyword. No intelligent large company would buy them.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:45:05 pm
http://www.apple.com/switch/stories/richardziskin.html (http://www.apple.com/switch/stories/richardziskin.html)

http://www.apple.com/switch/stories/theresamcpherson.html (http://www.apple.com/switch/stories/theresamcpherson.html)

http://www.apple.com/switch/whyswitch/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/whyswitch/)

http://www.apple.com/switch/questions/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/questions/)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:46:02 pm
A UMBRELLA MAKER?!!?!


HAHAHAHAHAHA! Am I The Only One Who Finds That Funny?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:47:23 pm
http://www.apple.com/switch/press/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/press/)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:48:17 pm
Aren't These technically 1 word or actually No word posts?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 06:48:41 pm
Quote
A UMBRELLA MAKER?!!?!


HAHAHAHAHAHA! Am I The Only One Who Finds That Funny?
hahahaha no hahahahahahahah.   who is richard ziskin?  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:49:01 pm
Quote
Aren't These technically 1 word or actually No word posts?
haha, that's all you have to say?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:50:31 pm
No, I'm Just Asking....

I Did Not Even Read Them. I Have A Feeling They Are More Crap.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:53:36 pm
Well then, you're wrong.  You might learn something if you read
http://www.apple.com/switch/whyswitch/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/whyswitch/)
http://www.apple.com/switch/questions/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/questions/)
and http://www.apple.com/switch/press/ (http://www.apple.com/switch/press/)

"Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product."-Ferenc Mantfeld
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:55:57 pm
Oh wow, I Am Laughing So Hard On That Quote. HAHAHAAHAHA!! -sarcasm-
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 06:56:45 pm
You're not supposed to.  You're supposed to read the stuff I gave you the URLs for...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 06:57:49 pm
Why?


Probably Just Crap.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 07:01:38 pm
No, it's not.  I wouldn't consider stuff that the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, CBSNews.com, ZDNet AnchorDesk, and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette write about Macs to be crap. :dry:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on May 31, 2004, 07:05:33 pm
Gotta Go To Sleep, Got School Tomorrow :(

I will argue with the moron later.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 07:07:32 pm
Quote
I will argue with the moron later.
Arguing with yourself is unhealthy.  Seriously, out of all the people who posted in this thread today, you made the stupidest posts.  It's not even funny anymore.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on May 31, 2004, 07:10:39 pm
Quote
Gotta Go To Sleep, Got School Tomorrow :(

I will argue with the moron later.
i gotta go to sleep too. soon i'll be done school and i'll get to argue with people about computers all night.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on May 31, 2004, 07:17:15 pm
Honestly, I don't see why you guys keep arguing. Spongey34, you'll never get me to switch to Apple, and I'll never get you to switch to Windows. I'm switching to Linux soon, like maybe this week.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on May 31, 2004, 08:04:19 pm
Debating is fine.  Name-calling is just lame.  These threads exist so people can have insightful, healthy debates.  They aren't places to hold flame wars.  So, cool it, people.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on May 31, 2004, 08:34:48 pm
I like to keep it to simple debating, but when people are oblivios to my posts, and then make pointless ones, it really gets me mad.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 08:43:46 am
Don't be calling people morons cause thats another sentence enhancer. Plus, you might get warned for doing that in the future. Spongey is the only one really good debates about Macs. I may side with him one day :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 01, 2004, 02:24:16 pm
Um, David and Kevin, you still haven't done that challenge.

Oh, and Spongy, all those reviews came off of the Apple website. They won't post anything negative said about their products. There may be a lot of negative comments. Qui sait? Who knows? I'm not saying the people who are giving good reviews to Macs aren't good places. They really are good. I'm saying, maybe you should look for good reviews on sites other than the official one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongehead91 on June 01, 2004, 02:33:12 pm
my veiw on macs is:


I never had one so i dont know much about them. The school i used to go to had macs and they were OK but now i dont use macs.
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 03:07:21 pm
Macs should come out with Laptops :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 03:23:06 pm
Ummm... They have had the PowerBook for a while... Since about 1991.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 03:24:46 pm
can i see a picture?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 03:37:25 pm
OK. Here you go.

(http://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/2041/560/store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/cp_powerbook_1003.gif)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 03:37:55 pm
details? I need details :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 03:42:48 pm
You don't give up do you?


Click me (http://www.apple.com/powerbook/)... <_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 01, 2004, 04:18:56 pm
Or you could go with the iBook.  And MEEP, I hear what your saying.  But I haven't found that kinda stuff on Microsoft's website...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 04:20:46 pm
I'll have to go with the Mac laptops but PCs without laptops :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 01, 2004, 04:36:31 pm
Yay, we have a switcer...kinda. :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 04:39:06 pm
laptops are cool but PC still rox
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 01, 2004, 04:46:42 pm
Ok, this is a question because I'm curious and I'm not trying to make fun of Macs, but why does Apple offer a Microsoft Office...demo I guess you'd call it on their site?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 01, 2004, 04:48:41 pm
Apple doesn't offer it.  Microsoft makes a version of office for Apple, because they think they'll make more money.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 05:05:14 pm
I heard that they stopped making it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 01, 2004, 05:11:01 pm
Quote
I heard that they stopped making it.
Making what?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 05:12:39 pm
*Sigh*

Read the thread again...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 01, 2004, 05:16:37 pm
Quote
Apple doesn't offer it.  Microsoft makes a version of office for Apple, because they think they'll make more money.
They should make money off of it because it's a great program.

Quote
*Sigh*

Read the thread again...
I don't see what you're getting at.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 01, 2004, 05:20:48 pm
I meant Microsoft Office.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 01, 2004, 08:40:34 pm
Actually, I'm pretty sure Apple and Microsoft's "peace treaty" expired a year ago.  But since M$ knows that more people are buying Macs, they still wanna make software for it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 09:14:27 pm
more people? Riiiiiiiight. Statistics?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 01, 2004, 09:26:12 pm
Not more people than PC people.  More people are buying Macs now than they did... say, a few years ago.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 01, 2004, 09:31:41 pm
Ah. I can believe that. SUCKA!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 06, 2004, 04:31:18 pm
Quote
Not more people than PC people.  More people are buying Macs now than they did... say, a few years ago.
WTF???...

Uhhhh proof?...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 06, 2004, 08:57:31 pm
Wow, I'm kinda surprised that you people didn't know that.  Apple is continuing to do better and better...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 07, 2004, 10:14:53 am
I gotta agree with Spongey. I hear a lot more people saying they have Macs here in town but there are still more PC users
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 07, 2004, 10:33:14 am
Totally unrelated: A couple of days ago I was looking at the front of a G5 closely, and I could see the detail. It's really cool. It's the same detail as the toolbars in Safari.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 07, 2004, 07:10:02 pm
Okay get this!

If there was mac vers. of softwares i like I would switch to a mac!

But is it possible to turn a pc into a mac
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 07, 2004, 07:13:01 pm
Actually, there is speculation Apple is releasing a P.C. OS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 07, 2004, 07:14:45 pm
Okay never mind
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 07, 2004, 09:02:55 pm
All the software that you have on your PC, you can find the same or even better version of it for Macs.  And there's this thing called Virtual PC, you know?  And people, please don't ask about a Virtual Mac... it's called Windows. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 07, 2004, 09:07:15 pm
better versions my butt
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 07, 2004, 09:14:14 pm
You don't know what you're talking about. Actually use it before you flame it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 07, 2004, 09:31:25 pm
You use it before you flame it you PC user
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on June 07, 2004, 10:38:09 pm
Quote
All the software that you have on your PC, you can find the same or even better version of it for Macs.  And there's this thing called Virtual PC,
Yeah, my sister has that on her Powerbook(I think its called that.) I guess that's how much Mac users like Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 08, 2004, 08:22:46 am
Quote
You use it before you flame it you PC user
Quit making no sense.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 08, 2004, 10:49:36 am
You're the one that uses the PC...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 08, 2004, 01:22:27 pm
I use PC, that's true. But that dosen't make ONE bit of sense why you're pointing that out.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 08, 2004, 01:42:56 pm
if you wanna get a mac go get it. Other wise get off your stupid pc
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 08, 2004, 08:56:53 pm
1. I can't go get Mac.

2. I've done all that work you have to do to get my Dell halfway-decent.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 08, 2004, 09:11:03 pm
Just because patrick101 can't use his Mac doesn't mean you should get mad at him...

And I don't know anyone who uses Virtual PC.  I think it's stupid.  I guess it's for the people who are still trying to adjust... or like to waste money.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 08, 2004, 10:34:12 pm
1.Dell sux so bad
2.Get a mac then we'll talk
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 09, 2004, 05:00:12 pm
Quote
1.Dell sux so bad
2.Get a mac then we'll talk
1. I know that.
2. You're talking to yourself, right?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 05:51:34 pm
Quote
1.Dell sux so bad
2.Get a mac then we'll talk
1. No, Windows just dosen't work right.
2. You don't know why you're saying that...




Oh yeah, and my Mac is 5 years old, I thought I would share that...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 09, 2004, 05:54:32 pm
Quote
1. No, Windows just dosen't work right.
What do you mean it doesn't work right? It works fine.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 09, 2004, 05:59:54 pm
You have no idea...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on June 09, 2004, 06:04:38 pm
Quote
You have no idea...
Ok, give me something thats wrong with Windows that Mac is better at....and don't say "It's more stable." or whatever you say.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 06:11:46 pm
Mac OS X can support 64-bit computing while it is a 32-bit OS, while Windows users need a 64-bit edition of the OS. David's turn! :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 09, 2004, 06:22:05 pm
Uhh... uhh... *panics* my turn?  Why me!  :laugh: jk

It looks prettier. :tongue:  
It performs better.  
It has AirPort Express and AirTunes. :cool:  
They're cheaper, if you actual do some research and know what you're getting.  For the same money, you can get a Mac that's much better than a PC.  
They have the best notebooks.
Extremely customizable.
People who use them get a better education.
The best software is made for them.
The king of digital media.
... is that too much for one post? :tongue:  If not, go back to my other posts in this topic.  There's a lot more.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 07:14:48 pm
Quote
It has AirPort Express and AirTunes. :cool:  
 
You mean AirPort Extreme and iTunes.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 09, 2004, 07:22:54 pm
I wonder if it is possible to turn a oc into a mac software wise
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 07:43:21 pm
That's not even worth it. Windows will just make it slower.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 09, 2004, 07:44:23 pm
Dude, he said PC, not Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 07:46:52 pm
Ah, I was unaware of what I was reading.



(UNRELATED) Korax, taking 5 more seconds to spellcheck your posts isn't a bad idea.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 09, 2004, 07:47:36 pm
Yeah, it's not that P.C.'s themselves are bad, it's just Windows isn't the greatest ever. It's just a lot cheaper than paying for a Mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 07:49:17 pm
Delete this, I didn't read right.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 09, 2004, 08:07:47 pm
I understand dude. I see what you were thinkin'.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 09, 2004, 08:59:28 pm
Quote
You mean AirPort Extreme and iTunes.
Nope.  Go to Apple's site.  It's the new thing they released. :cool:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 09, 2004, 09:10:20 pm
Yeah I just went. I also see the Dual 2.5GHz G5. Yay!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 09, 2004, 09:15:50 pm
Yep, 2.5 GHz is awesome as well.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 10, 2004, 07:14:39 pm
Pfft it needs dual prosesor to be 64 bit

I meant is it possible to put a mac os on a pc
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 10, 2004, 07:18:21 pm
Mac OS on a PC? It would be... Slightly OK. Mac OS is best with Mac hardware.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 10, 2004, 09:08:37 pm
Yeah, Mac OS wasn't built for PCs, but oh well.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 11, 2004, 11:12:18 am
They need to make a computer where you can choose your version that you want to use...put all of them on there and let you choose

I realize this is kind of off topic but thats what I was thinking at the time
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 11, 2004, 01:35:47 pm
Why would you want to choose your own version? You only need one... The best one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 13, 2004, 06:41:58 pm
DId u know windows ME was a complete rip off of 98
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 13, 2004, 06:45:46 pm
All Windows are rip-offs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 13, 2004, 06:50:26 pm
What do u mean
500th post
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on June 13, 2004, 07:53:58 pm
ME is just 98 with the additional feature of being able to turn back time with a  System Restore.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on June 13, 2004, 08:48:58 pm
turning back time could be fun :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 13, 2004, 10:48:48 pm
Quote
ME is just 98 with the additional feature of being able to turn back time with a System Restore.
How exactly does that work? :beta:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 13, 2004, 11:15:16 pm
So it took 2 years for MS to add one simple feature. :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 14, 2004, 10:26:14 am
Quote
So it took 2 years for MS to add one simple feature. :laugh:
Pwn3d! :happy:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 14, 2004, 04:20:21 pm
:sends an email to bill gates saying YOU SUCK!!!:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on June 14, 2004, 04:23:18 pm
Quote
:sends an email to bill gates saying YOU SUCK!!!:
Let's watch the language here. This is a mature debate eh?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 14, 2004, 06:55:59 pm
I don't see any bad language :question:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on June 14, 2004, 08:15:18 pm
Quote
I don't see any bad language :question:
True. Though the whole
Quote
YOU SUCK!!!
Isn't too nice.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on June 14, 2004, 08:54:34 pm
So?  The truth hurts.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on June 14, 2004, 09:12:34 pm
lol very true :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 16, 2004, 07:51:13 pm
WTF?...

I think my brain started to smoke
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 03, 2004, 04:27:32 pm
It wouldn't surprise me.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 03, 2004, 07:43:50 pm
I found out why a 800mhz mac beats a 2ghz pc

Applications on a mac os use less prossesor bandwidth

Why i dont like macs
Cannot build them
monitor with comp
only external devices
Costs too much for too little
they always lie
they need dual prossesor for 64bit
if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
they still use isa slots
if you interupt a cd it frezes
same with floppy
something internal breaks ur screwed
not many applications i like don't work with it
only one button clik
no print screen
everything is made by mac so it costs very much
you cant use pc stuff on a mac
MACS SUCK!!!
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 03, 2004, 09:48:04 pm
Quote
Cannot build them
monitor with comp
only external devices
Costs too much for too little
they always lie
they need dual prossesor for 64bit
if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
they still use isa slots
if you interupt a cd it frezes
same with floppy
something internal breaks ur screwed
not many applications i like don't work with it
only one button clik
no print screen
everything is made by mac so it costs very much
you cant use pc stuff on a mac

1. You don't need to build them to get something that's actually good.
2. That's a good thing, but if you don't like it that way, don't worry.  Most of them aren't like that.
3. The external devices are very good.
4. If you actually do some research, you'll find that it costs less for more.
5. Um, my computer hasn't lied to me...
6. Dual processor is better.
7. CRTs suck, and I uh, don't plan on dropping my computer.
8. So?
9. No it doesn't.
10. haha, floppy?  You're living in the past, foo.
11. Maybe you're used to your PC, but Macs aren't known for internal stuff breaking.
12. There's way more applications that you think, and they're all much better than what you're used to with Windoze.
13. Apple Pro Mice are the best, but if you want a "two button click" they have those too.
14. You can take a picture of the screen.
15. Everything is made by Apple, so it's good.
16. Yes you can.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 03, 2004, 10:54:17 pm
I do have one question though. What's up with mac not using the right mouse button. I was on my sister's Powerbook. I clicked the right mouse button for the heck of it and nothing happenend. I must say I was dissapointed.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 03, 2004, 10:58:31 pm
Um, I don't have a PowerBook, so I wouldn't know why...
But if there is another mouse button, I'm sure it works, even if it didn't that one time.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 03, 2004, 11:03:56 pm
Quote



Cannot build them
monitor with comp
only external devices
Costs too much for too little
they always lie
they need dual prossesor for 64bit
if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
they still use isa slots
if you interupt a cd it frezes
same with floppy
something internal breaks ur screwed
not many applications i like don't work with it
only one button clik
no print screen
everything is made by mac so it costs very much
you cant use pc stuff on a mac
 
... Never seen such unbiased and unexperienced comparsions like that before, Korax.

. You don't need to build them.

. That's for the old stuff. My Mac has a seperate monitor.

. External devices are good.

. You need to do research. <_<

. They don't lie. You'll get your turn to get pwned by the facts.

. I didn't get a new CRT when I got my new G4.

. They USED to sell single 64-bits, but they put up duals at the same price as the single. Now don't take this as an endorsement, but the Dual 2.0GHz is now 2,499. The Dual 2.5GHz is $3,000, in answer to the past things some particular people said.

. Wtf?

. Don't know where you're getting at. I've done that, and no, it did not "Freeze".

. Get out of that ditch Korax, For floppy drives are old-school.

. Not exactly true.

. Most apps should work with it, Or Apple released something like it, but better.

. My Mac has a 12-button "clik".

. Yeah there is... Shift+Apple+4. :ph34r:

. Some hardware is made my other companies. >_<

. Like what PC stuff?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 04, 2004, 09:58:12 am
What i meant was mac always lies they said they were going to make a 3.00ghz porssesor and yet they didnt. well that is what my friend said

Biulding them is fun
Yes i know that
external devices cost more
WHen i was using a mac I loaded something onto it and opened the cd rom drive and it froze
Yet today i still use floppies
You need to learn how to build  a computer
SMartjunco (A member here) said "pfft it needs dual prossesors to be 64 bit"
Yes it is true if something internal breaks ur screwed. Yet if you have a separate unit with monitor you can fix it
They wwere not made by apple
MOUSE only has 1 button click unless you buy 2 button
MACS SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 04, 2004, 10:03:17 am
Quote
if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
 
If you drop any CRT you most likely have to buy a new one...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 04, 2004, 11:39:24 am
Quote
10. haha, floppy?  You're living in the past, foo.
It's always good to have a Floppy Disc Drive because of the old games and stuff on them. I've used the Floppy Disc Drive a few times on my computer.

Quote
14. You can take a picture of the screen.
But you can't get it into Jpegs or Gifs. It just won't let me do it.

I also don't like the single-click mouse. It gets rather annoying when you're doing projects.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 04, 2004, 11:50:36 am
You people need to undestand something. Just because you think there are only single-click mice out for it, that dosen't make it true. My Mac's mouse has 12 buttons. Plus, there's a right-click keyboard stroke for the people with the single-click mice. ^_>
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 04, 2004, 11:52:45 am
Quote
My Mac's mouse has 12 buttons.
I doubt that. 3+ seems like too many buttons on a mouse, 1 seems like too few.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 11:53:03 am
Quote
Biulding them is fun
Yes i know that
external devices cost more
WHen i was using a mac I loaded something onto it and opened the cd rom drive and it froze
Yet today i still use floppies
You need to learn how to build  a computer
SMartjunco (A member here) said "pfft it needs dual prossesors to be 64 bit"
Yes it is true if something internal breaks ur screwed. Yet if you have a separate unit with monitor you can fix it
They wwere not made by apple
MOUSE only has 1 button click unless you buy 2 button
First of all, don't listen to your friends and other members here.  They obviously don't know what they're talking about.

1. Um, that's good for you.
2. Then why are you complaining about it?
3. They cost more for a reason.
4. Okay, don't say that Macs suck because you use OS 9.  Get OS X!
5. I feel bad for you.
6. No I don't...
7. Uh, look at what I first said.
8. Yes, but Macs don't 'break' like PCs do.
9. Okay... then who do you think they were made by? There's no 'Mac.'  The company is called Apple. :dry:
10. That's exactly what I said. :wink:

Quote
It's always good to have a Floppy Disc Drive because of the old games and stuff on them. I've used the Floppy Disc Drive a few times on my computer.
Well, the old computers still have them, if you're still in to old games.

Quote
But you can't get it into Jpegs or Gifs. It just won't let me do it.
Yes you can. It's very easy to do.  Just because you don't know how to do something, doesn't mean that Macs suck.  It means you should stay clear of this debate.

Quote
I also don't like the single-click mouse. It gets rather annoying when you're doing projects.
Then buy a different mouse.  It's not that hard.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 04, 2004, 11:59:34 am
Quote
Quote
It's always good to have a Floppy Disc Drive because of the old games and stuff on them. I've used the Floppy Disc Drive a few times on my computer.
Well, the old computers still have them, if you're still in to old games.
The old games are the best. I'm gonna try to play them on the new computer.

Quote
Quote
But you can't get it into Jpegs or Gifs. It just won't let me do it.
Yes you can. It's very easy to do.  Just because you don't know how to do something, doesn't mean that Macs suck.  It means you should stay clear of this debate.

Um, you told me how to do it and it still won't work. It keeps telling me to add something to a folder when it's already there.

Quote
Quote
I also don't like the single-click mouse. It gets rather annoying when you're doing projects.
Then buy a different mouse.  It's not that hard.
Money doesn't grow on trees. I don't want to have to keep buying extra stuff for a computer when I don't need to.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 04, 2004, 12:00:26 pm
Quote
I doubt that. 3+ seems like too many buttons on a mouse, 1 seems like too few.
Actually it has 10. Wanna see a pic?


(http://www.kensington.com/images/pc/K64245-4204.jpg)


Quote
Money doesn't grow on trees. I don't want to have to keep buying extra stuff for a computer when I don't need to.

they're not that expensive... <_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 04, 2004, 12:04:03 pm
Quote
(http://www.kensington.com/images/pc/K64245-4204.jpg)
What do they all do?

Quote
Quote
Money doesn't grow on trees. I don't want to have to keep buying extra stuff for a computer when I don't need to.

they're not that expensive... <_<

What I'm saying is that you should have a choice of 1 or 2-button mice when buying a computer. I don't want to spend extra money for something  I don't want.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 12:07:08 pm
Quote
The old games are the best. I'm gonna try to play them on the new computer.
Okay, that's cool.

Quote
Um, you told me how to do it and it still won't work. It keeps telling me to add something to a folder when it's already there.
Um, I told everyone to stop basing their facts off of OS 9.  Get OS X.  Then start talking.

Quote
Money doesn't grow on trees. I don't want to have to keep buying extra stuff for a computer when I don't need to.
Exactly.  You don't need to.  Apple's Pro Mouse is a lot better than anything else you might find.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 04, 2004, 12:10:32 pm
Quote
What do they all do?
The 6 on top, in Safari:
No. 1 goes to the homepage.
No. 2 goes to Kensington.com
No. 3 goes to Excite
No. 4 goes to Apple.com
No. 5 goes to MacSurfer
No. 6 goes to Macowrld
 
Other:
The scroll button... Scrolls...
The top left highlights text.
The top right highlights the word nearest to the mouse.
Bottom left serves as the main button.
Bottom left is right-click.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 04, 2004, 01:11:23 pm
that's alot of buttons. wouldn't that get kind of confusing.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 04, 2004, 01:35:42 pm
A 12 button mouse seems like a waste of money. The nice thing about PC's is that you don't support oppressive giant corporations.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 02:04:31 pm
Um, ever heard of Microsoft? :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 04, 2004, 03:19:21 pm
If you have a PC, you don't have to have Windows. You can build your own computer and use Linux without supporting the oppression of companies like Apple. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 03:26:05 pm
Who says that's different for Macs?  And Apple doesn't pester you like Microsoft.  Believe me. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 04, 2004, 03:26:57 pm
If you use a mac, you have to buy it direct from Apple. And you have to use Apples software. In other words, support the oppression. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 03:31:26 pm
You don't have to buy it from Apple, or use their software.  In other words, you're wrong.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 04, 2004, 03:51:48 pm
Quote
The 6 on top, in Safari:
No. 1 goes to the homepage.
No. 2 goes to Kensington.com
No. 3 goes to Excite
No. 4 goes to Apple.com
No. 5 goes to MacSurfer
No. 6 goes to Macowrld
Can you reprogram those buttons to go to different things?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 04, 2004, 04:09:06 pm
why have all those buttons? What's wrong with point and click?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 04, 2004, 05:39:42 pm
I think Kensington just wants to make something different, that's all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 04, 2004, 09:20:54 pm
Quote
Why i dont like macs
1 Cannot build them
2 monitor with comp
3 only external devices
4 Costs too much for too little
5 they always lie
6 they need dual prossesor for 64bit
7 if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
8 they still use isa slots
9 if you interupt a cd it frezes
10 same with floppy
11 something internal breaks ur screwed
12 not many applications i like don't work with it
13 only one button clik
14 no print screen
15 everything is made by mac so it costs very much
16 you cant use pc stuff on a mac
Let me give you a professional answer:

1 You can custom build Macs from Apple's online store, thank you. :blink:
2 The built-in monitor is only with iMacs, eMacs, and portables. The Powermacs don't have a built in monitor. And you can connect another monitor to an iMac, eMac, or portable anyway :rolleyes:
3 PowerMacs are highly expandable - you can swap hard drives, graphics cards, almost anything. Same with the iMacs, eMacs, and portables, but to a lesser extent
4 The initial price may be higher than the crappy $600 box you get, but tech support, upgrades, and return on your investment will end up paying for the computer in the end
5 Who lies? Apple? They may make some false claims, no more than any Microsoft or Dell would either... Apple makes reliable hardware and software - please, stop being so close-minded :tongue:
6 Most people don't even know what 32-bit is, let alone 64. It doesn't affect the average user, even the professional - unless, of course, your planning on becoming a rocket-scientist
7 Who would be so STUPID to drop any computer?! The only machine Apple makes that has a CRT is the eMac - which, in fact, have handles, just for those who are warry of dropping them...like you :biggrin:
8 I am not big on expansion card terms, so I'll give you that one :happy:
9 How does it freeze, may I ask? How do you interrupt a CD? Do you jam your finger in the slot? :tongue: At most, if any one app crashes, it is that one app only - the rest of the system is fine :cool:
10 Who needs floppies these days? Seriously... PC manufacturers waste money by building machines w/ 'em :wacko:
11 True - but that is unlikely. And, is that not the same for PC's?  :rolleyes:
12 See answer #16
13 You can buy a regular 2 button mouse at any tech store, and it will work with the Mac - its need to be USB though...
14 Print screen? As in printing what is currently on the monitor? You take a screenshot (CMD+SHIFT+3), open it up, and print - now thats not too hard, is it? :tongue:
15 Everything is not made by Apple, although some of the more quality apps are. Hey, quality over quantity, and Apple's got PCs hands down :original:
16 Its called Virtual PC, dumbbutt. Microsoft recently bought it, in case you didn't know :rolleyes:

There ya go, now read a book before you start blindly makin' statements like that again :wacko: :biggrin:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 05, 2004, 01:00:22 am
Quote
Quote
The 6 on top, in Safari:
No. 1 goes to the homepage.
No. 2 goes to Kensington.com
No. 3 goes to Excite
No. 4 goes to Apple.com
No. 5 goes to MacSurfer
No. 6 goes to Macowrld
Can you reprogram those buttons to go to different things?
Yeah, but I don't really care about the buttons. I type 65 a minute, so I don't care.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 05, 2004, 02:10:11 pm
Quote
Quote
Why i dont like macs
1 Cannot build them
2 monitor with comp
3 only external devices
4 Costs too much for too little
5 they always lie
6 they need dual prossesor for 64bit
7 if you drop a mac with a crt monitor you have to buy a new one
8 they still use isa slots
9 if you interupt a cd it frezes
10 same with floppy
11 something internal breaks ur screwed
12 not many applications i like don't work with it
13 only one button clik
14 no print screen
15 everything is made by mac so it costs very much
16 you cant use pc stuff on a mac
Let me give you a professional answer:

1 You can custom build Macs from Apple's online store, thank you. :blink:
2 The built-in monitor is only with iMacs, eMacs, and portables. The Powermacs don't have a built in monitor. And you can connect another monitor to an iMac, eMac, or portable anyway :rolleyes:
3 PowerMacs are highly expandable - you can swap hard drives, graphics cards, almost anything. Same with the iMacs, eMacs, and portables, but to a lesser extent
4 The initial price may be higher than the crappy $600 box you get, but tech support, upgrades, and return on your investment will end up paying for the computer in the end
5 Who lies? Apple? They may make some false claims, no more than any Microsoft or Dell would either... Apple makes reliable hardware and software - please, stop being so close-minded :tongue:
6 Most people don't even know what 32-bit is, let alone 64. It doesn't affect the average user, even the professional - unless, of course, your planning on becoming a rocket-scientist
7 Who would be so STUPID to drop any computer?! The only machine Apple makes that has a CRT is the eMac - which, in fact, have handles, just for those who are warry of dropping them...like you :biggrin:
8 I am not big on expansion card terms, so I'll give you that one :happy:
9 How does it freeze, may I ask? How do you interrupt a CD? Do you jam your finger in the slot? :tongue: At most, if any one app crashes, it is that one app only - the rest of the system is fine :cool:
10 Who needs floppies these days? Seriously... PC manufacturers waste money by building machines w/ 'em :wacko:
11 True - but that is unlikely. And, is that not the same for PC's?  :rolleyes:
12 See answer #16
13 You can buy a regular 2 button mouse at any tech store, and it will work with the Mac - its need to be USB though...
14 Print screen? As in printing what is currently on the monitor? You take a screenshot (CMD+SHIFT+3), open it up, and print - now thats not too hard, is it? :tongue:
15 Everything is not made by Apple, although some of the more quality apps are. Hey, quality over quantity, and Apple's got PCs hands down :original:
16 Its called Virtual PC, dumbbutt. Microsoft recently bought it, in case you didn't know :rolleyes:

There ya go, now read a book before you start blindly makin' statements like that again :wacko: :biggrin:
NOW THAT YOU JUST GOT ON MY ::Dolphin Noise::ED OFF SIDE!!!!  :angry:   :excl:

1. Ft Building them is a *(%$ of a lot cheaper
2. ft too they suck anyway
3. Whatever
5. Hey i live in a close minded family
6. I have not even tried that
7. Pfft you
8. you should
9. When its loading &*&%
10. A mac would implode if you put a floppy in it
11. seriosly dude...
12. Whatever
13. whateva
14 *mac catches fire*
15  yeah $1500.00 4 a 1.25hgz mac  :tongue:
16 F&*K YOU!!! B)(*H


 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 05, 2004, 02:11:38 pm
Quote
If you use a mac, you have to buy it direct from Apple. And you have to use Apples software. In other words, support the oppression. :ph34r:
You can install Linux on a Mac too. No need to use the Mac OS. IZ, go read a book as well :tongue:

Quote
NOW THAT YOU JUST GOT ON MY ::Dolphin Noise::ED OFF SIDE!!!!  :angry:   :excl:

1. Ft Building them is a *(%$ of a lot cheaper
2. ft too they suck anyway
3. Whatever
5. Hey i live in a close minded family
6. I have not even tried that
7. Pfft you
8. you should
9. When its loading &*&%
10. A mac would implode if you put a floppy in it
11. seriosly dude...
12. Whatever
13. whateva
14 *mac catches fire*
15  yeah $1500.00 4 a 1.25hgz mac  :tongue:
16 F&*K YOU!!! B)(*H

Dude, I'm half playin' w/ ya. Just had to throw a few comments in there  :biggrin: But, I think I answered each question enough. Seems like you didn't know the Mac side of the story - I could say the same about me, I don't follow Windoze that much :sleep: So, there you go. I think I made my point. Oh, one more thing - lay off on the vulgar language, foo. It doesn't make you seem any smarter or better :happy:

Cheers! :cool:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 05, 2004, 02:38:35 pm
Quote

You can install Linux on a Mac too. No need to use the Mac OS. IZ, go read a book as well :tongue:
 
Korax, leet or no leet, you are NOT allowed to swear.

AH! Reading hurts Kevins brain!
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 05, 2004, 05:03:59 pm
Quote
Oh, one more thing - lay off on the vulgar language, foo. It doesn't make you seem any smarter or better :happy:
 
It's okay. I gave him two days to go sit in the corner. He should be nice when he gets back.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 05, 2004, 05:15:26 pm
Reading takes too long...point taken
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 05, 2004, 08:53:53 pm
Quote
1. Ft Building them is a *(%$ of a lot cheaper
2. ft too they suck anyway
3. Whatever
5. Hey i live in a close minded family
6. I have not even tried that
7. Pfft you
8. you should
9. When its loading &*&%
10. A mac would implode if you put a floppy in it
11. seriosly dude...
12. Whatever
13. whateva
14 *mac catches fire*
15  yeah $1500.00 4 a 1.25hgz mac  :tongue:
16 F&*K YOU!!! B)(*H
I'll reply to the ones worth replying to.

10. I could put a floppy in my Mac, and it wouldn't implode. Now, to get a digital camcorder and a floppy to put in my Mac...

11. Well, it's true.

12&13. Not even a reply. :lol:

14. My Mac dosen't catch on fire when I do print screen.

15. Like Spongedude said, Quality over quanity. And it's actually 1,500 for a dual 1.25GHz G4. \m/ :rolleyes:

16. Apparently you don't want to use the programs you like on a quality computer.

7. -Giggles-



BTW, There are people licensed to sell Macs, so Macs aren't proprietary. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 08, 2004, 02:18:23 pm
I was grounded from my comp because i broke my dads key board\
from loosing it

No joke: I had to go to the hospital because of a mental breakdown. no joke

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 08, 2004, 03:04:27 pm
I doubt you went to the hospital for having a mental breakdown, after a 2-DAY suspension. I've had month-long suspensions for the kind of stuff you did. I've never been to a hospital.

Back to the debate...

Someone else can start.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 08, 2004, 06:04:21 pm
Seriosly dude i have those. Yet not too often

TOO BAD!!! i started

I wonder if it is possible to put a mac os on a PC

They say that the g5 is the fastest in the world but it only goe's 2.0 ghz
and yet another computer company. Forgot the name of the company. they have comps that go over 6.0 ghz. unless andrew is sj is lying

DId you know that technology that is better is cheaper

120gb IDE drive $115
120GB sata drive $7???!!???!

www.pricewatch.com
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 08, 2004, 06:18:32 pm
Quote
I wonder if it is possible to put a mac os on a PC
Yes, it's now possible to run Mac OS X on x86.
Quote
They say that the g5 is the fastest in the world but it only goe's 2.0 ghz
and yet another computer company. Forgot the name of the company. they have comps that go over 6.0 ghz. unless andrew is sj is lying
Um, Apple's 2.5 GHz is better for the money, than Dells 3 GHz, or whatever else there is...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 08, 2004, 10:40:38 pm
Quote
Quote
I wonder if it is possible to put a mac os on a PC
Yes, it's now possible to run Mac OS X on x86.
Quote
They say that the g5 is the fastest in the world but it only goe's 2.0 ghz
and yet another computer company. Forgot the name of the company. they have comps that go over 6.0 ghz. unless andrew is sj is lying
Um, Apple's 2.5 GHz is better for the money, than Dells 3 GHz, or whatever else there is...
1. How old are the x86 Processors again? :huh:

2. Yeah, that and it's a dual processor. Seriously, an FX-53 is .1GHz less, and the OS requires less bandwidth from the processor. I go on opinion, eh? :lol:

3. Pretty much everyone against Macs in this thread haven't used Panther... :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 08, 2004, 10:56:32 pm
Quote
Pretty much everyone against Macs in this thread haven't used Panther... :ph34r:
True dat.  Just wait 'till Tiger comes out... :cool:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 09, 2004, 12:19:40 am
I'm waiting for someone to slip up again so I can teach 'em a lesson :tongue:

I've had enough fun w/ korax for now :biggrin:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 09, 2004, 08:01:37 am
Quote
3. Pretty much everyone against Macs in this thread haven't used Panther... :ph34r:
I have, I just don't think it's worth the money.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 10:55:00 am
Um, for the *I lost count* time, Panther is less expensive than XP. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 09, 2004, 12:18:29 pm
Quote
Quote
3. Pretty much everyone against Macs in this thread haven't used Panther... :ph34r:
I have, I just don't think it's worth the money.
How long have you used it? Enough to determine its real value? Of course, we're all different, so what may be worth it to some, won't for others. But trying it out for 15 minutes at CompUSA isn't enough to say 'its not worth it'  :rolleyes:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 09, 2004, 04:08:19 pm
Quote
Um, for the *I lost count* time, Panther is less expensive than XP. :wink:
HA HA I GOT XP 4 FREE  :tongue:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 04:14:47 pm
Yeah that's pretty cool... it's not worth paying for. :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 09, 2004, 05:51:50 pm
Quote
Quote
Um, for the *I lost count* time, Panther is less expensive than XP. :wink:
HA HA I GOT XP 4 FREE  :tongue:
So? I got Panther for free. Plus, this is for the average f00 who payed. >_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 09, 2004, 06:19:04 pm
I saw xp at a store for $199.99 +1c how much is Panther  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 06:25:27 pm
haha, $199? :laugh:  Sucks to be Windoze users.
Mac OS X is $129 :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 09, 2004, 07:15:10 pm
Yeah but your unit (computer) costs over $1000.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 09, 2004, 07:18:49 pm
I guess PC users don't like long-term investing :tongue:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 07:19:56 pm
Quote
Yeah but your computer costs over $1000.
Yeah, but it'sactually good.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 09, 2004, 09:18:11 pm
Quote
haha, $199? :laugh:  Sucks to be Windoze users.
Mac OS X is $129 :wink:
If you want to be legal about it. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 09:44:26 pm
haha. My one friend has never paid for any piece of software.  Except for Linux... but he just gave the dude a 20 and ran... :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 09, 2004, 10:13:26 pm
Whats the differnce between the 2?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 09, 2004, 10:16:51 pm
Pretty simple.  Macs are better. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 10, 2004, 12:04:48 am
Quote
Whats the differnce between the 2?
Windows is the most-used OS today, made by Microsoft. It uses so much CPU, that it makes it slow, and unreliable. -- The last computer I got was a PC. It started Ok, then went to junk quickly. M$ blames it on the user too much.

Macintosh OS X is a Unix-Based OS by Apple. It's fast, and reliable. Apps don't use so much CPU. Now only if it had an easier-to-use layout... -- I've used Macs all my life, and I know this: They sucked until OS X.

Linux isn't in this debate-- We would just all agree on it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 10, 2004, 07:33:53 am
Quote
haha. My one friend has never paid for any piece of software.  Except for Linux... but he just gave the dude a 20 and ran... :laugh:
So that's how you get Macs. You steal them so you won't have to pay all that money.   :tongue: j/k
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 10, 2004, 07:40:21 am
Quote
haha, $199? :laugh:  Sucks to be Windoze users.
Mac OS X is $129 :wink:
It's possible to get a XP home for $90, XP pro for $140, or the upgrade version for $84.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 10, 2004, 08:43:53 am
I never paid for Windows XP Pro. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 10, 2004, 10:27:45 am
Quote
So that's how you get Macs. You steal them so you won't have to pay all that money.   :tongue: j/k
Um, Macs aren't software... :wacko:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 10, 2004, 10:39:39 am
Quote
Quote
Yeah but your computer costs over $1000.
Yeah, but it'sactually good.
Ehhhh wrong mine was $800 for all the parts and yet it is faster than all of the max

 :blink: and yet when mac os'es use less prossesor bandwidth they are ussaly horrible. yet im too lazy to look at a mac os. any pix?

My dad has a early 80's motherboard it only has 8mb ram. 4mhz nothings integrated xcept keybord & batt. it also has a color, mono switch and it is SHARP!!!
I think it is shot though :sad:

 :lamo:

what happenes when mac users use a pc
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 10, 2004, 10:47:02 am
Quote
Ehhhh wrong mine was $800 for all the parts and yet it is faster than all of the max
It may have appear to be faster, but the performance is not as good.

Quote
and yet when mac os'es use less prossesor bandwidth they are ussaly horrible. yet im too lazy to look at a mac os. any pix?
Um, PCs use way more prossesor bandwidth than Macs...
If you want some pics, go here (http://www.apple.com/macosx/).

Quote
what happenes when mac users use a pc
They realize how lucky they are to have a Mac.

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 10, 2004, 10:54:06 am
Quote
Quote
haha. My one friend has never paid for any piece of software.  Except for Linux... but he just gave the dude a 20 and ran... :laugh:
So that's how you get Macs. You steal them so you won't have to pay all that money.   :tongue: j/k
Actually, his friend, Danny, used Windows and Linux. He stole WINDOWS, you pea-brained no-minders :tongue: :rolleyes:

---

What happens when anyone uses a PC:

 :lamo:

Unless PeeCees can detect who's using them. Lets keep this debate to the facts, please :huh:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 10, 2004, 10:55:26 am
Quote
Quote
Ehhhh wrong mine was $800 for all the parts and yet it is faster than all of the max
It may have appear to be faster, but the performance is not as good.

Quote
and yet when mac os'es use less prossesor bandwidth they are ussaly horrible. yet im too lazy to look at a mac os. any pix?
Um, PCs use way more prossesor bandwidth than Macs...
If you want some pics, go here (http://www.apple.com/macosx/).

Quote
what happenes when mac users use a pc
They realize how lucky they are to have a Mac.
Quote
It may have appear to be faster, but the performance is not as good.
Worx fine 4 me

Quote
Um, PCs use way more prossesor bandwidth than Macs...
If you want some pics

more prossesor bandwidth the better
Too blurry

Quote
They realize how lucky they are to have a Mac.

SHHHHHH! the pc's have ears LOL!!!  

looks like the pc hates u

 :laughing:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 10, 2004, 10:59:38 am
Quote
Actually, his friend, Danny, used Windows and Linux. He stole WINDOWS, you pea-brained no-minders :tongue: :rolleyes:
Actually, he has Windoze, Linux, and Mac OS X. hehe. 3 computers, a server, and a bunch of proxies... :ph34r: :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 10, 2004, 11:01:30 am
Quote
Quote
Actually, his friend, Danny, used Windows and Linux. He stole WINDOWS, you pea-brained no-minders :tongue: :rolleyes:
Actually, he has Windoze, Linux, and Mac OS X. hehe. 3 computers, a server, and a bunch of proxies... :ph34r: :laugh:
But thats as much as you'll get from us - *turns* you're gonna blow his cover, Spongey :biggrin:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 10, 2004, 11:02:34 am
Oh yeah, my bad. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 10, 2004, 03:38:38 pm
Quote
Quote
So that's how you get Macs. You steal them so you won't have to pay all that money.   :tongue: j/k
Um, Macs aren't software... :wacko:
Inside joke.  :biggrin:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 10, 2004, 06:04:53 pm
Quote
Inside joke. :biggrin:
Inside joke? Meaning your misinterpreted view that all Mac stuff is proprietary, and all software is Apple's? Gee, if you only knew how stupid that sounds :rolleyes:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 10, 2004, 07:12:03 pm
Quote
Quote
Inside joke. :biggrin:
Inside joke? Meaning your misinterpreted view that all Mac stuff is proprietary, and all software is Apple's? Gee, if you only knew how stupid that sounds :rolleyes:
I think you misinterpreted my post.  :tongue:    
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 10, 2004, 07:33:39 pm
Maybe... :tongue: Care to tell me what your talking about, or are you gonna just sit there like a dumb-dumb? This thread is for debates, not acting like a know-it-all :rolleyes:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 10, 2004, 07:36:55 pm
Quote
Maybe... :tongue: Care to tell me what your talking about, or are you gonna just sit there like a dumb-dumb? This thread is for debates, not acting like a know-it-all :rolleyes:
It's an inside joke. You are on the outside, if you know what I mean. Or do you not know what an inside joke is?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 10, 2004, 08:45:54 pm
I think everyone in this thread has a severe case of ADD.  Its the same stuff repeated over and over again for 45 pages...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 10, 2004, 09:47:54 pm
That's because PC users can't get the straight facts through their heads...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 10, 2004, 10:21:28 pm
It's just that too many people are using opinion.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 10, 2004, 10:36:50 pm
Quote
It's just that too many people are using opinion.
You shouldn't be talking. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SilverCreep on July 11, 2004, 10:26:30 am
Peoples opinion conflict can tear people apart.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 11, 2004, 10:34:43 am
Remember when i said OMG r those ISA slots, here is the differene between isa & pci

(http://www.ac-rennes.fr/pedagogie/svt/labosvt/technic/reseau/isa-pci.jpg)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 11, 2004, 12:17:35 pm
Quote
Quote
It's just that too many people are using opinion.
You shouldn't be talking. :ph34r:
Hey, you're the one who shouldn't be talking. When's the last time I used opinion?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 11, 2004, 06:40:45 pm
Quote
It's an inside joke. You are on the outside, if you know what I mean. Or do you not know what an inside joke is?
I know perfectly well what an inside joke is... but that isn't moving this debate forward :blink:

Quote
I think everyone in this thread has a severe case of ADD. Its the same stuff repeated over and over again for 45 pages...
You must have ADD too then :ohmy:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 11, 2004, 07:14:25 pm
Quote
I think everyone in this thread has a severe case of ADD.  Its the same stuff repeated over and over again for 45 pages...
well said C Man. well said.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 11, 2004, 07:53:19 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
It's just that too many people are using opinion.
You shouldn't be talking. :ph34r:
Hey, you're the one who shouldn't be talking. When's the last time I used opinion?
The last time you said Macs are better than PC. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 11, 2004, 08:17:23 pm
I'm not replying to that. Go read the thread. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Alain2k5 on July 11, 2004, 08:27:33 pm
Quote
I think everyone in this thread has a severe case of ADD.  Its the same stuff repeated over and over again for 45 pages...
Yup, this thread shouldn't ever been started.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 11, 2004, 08:34:24 pm
You people just can't face the facts... :wacko:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 11, 2004, 08:37:01 pm
:dry: some ppl wont belive. is topic should be locked or removed...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 11, 2004, 08:42:25 pm
There's nothing wrong with this topic.  Just because you people are tired of being proven wrong doesn't mean it should be closed. :angry:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 11, 2004, 08:53:54 pm
I'm not wrong. Macs are overpriced. ^_^
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 11, 2004, 08:54:31 pm
Tommorow im gonna ask my comp whiz dad a whole bunch of ?
 :tongue:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 11, 2004, 10:11:50 pm
I agree. This topic should be closed. its 45 pages of nonsence.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 11, 2004, 11:52:20 pm
Quote
Tommorow im gonna ask my comp whiz dad a whole bunch of ?
 :tongue:
That should probably be: my comp-whiz-windoze-biased-what-are-macs-?-close-minded-when-it-comes-to-computing-platforms dad

And, uh, the intelligent people in this conversation are the one's who don't ask their parents tech questions; rather, their parents ask them :tongue: :biggrin: j/p
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 11, 2004, 11:54:02 pm
Quote
I'm not wrong. Macs are overpriced. ^_^
No, PC's are underpriced - you pay less for a worse machine, that much to it :rolleyes:

Hehe, I posted twice :tongue:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 12, 2004, 06:29:09 am
Haha, yeah, don't do that again. :tongue:

PC's aren't that bad. :biggrin:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 12, 2004, 09:51:24 am
Quote
I'm not wrong. Macs are overpriced. ^_^
Just because you haven't done any research and aren't used to quality stuff, doesn't mean that Macs are overpriced.  So yeah, you are wrong.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 12, 2004, 09:54:05 am
Quote
Quote
I'm not wrong. Macs are overpriced. ^_^
Just because you haven't done any research and aren't used to quality stuff, doesn't mean that Macs are overpriced.  So yeah, you are wrong.
Yeah, they are overpriced. I'm not willing to dish out over $1000 for a computer that will be used for personal use.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 12, 2004, 10:03:18 am
you can get a good pc laptop for 700.  instead of paying 2000 for a mac laptop.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 12, 2004, 10:11:29 am
Quote
you can get a good pc laptop for 700.  instead of paying 2000 for a mac laptop.
My PC was about $300, yet it still pwns a lot of the other PC's.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 12, 2004, 10:38:32 am
Quote
you can get a good pc laptop for 700.  instead of paying 2000 for a mac laptop.
What you think is good, and what actually is good, are two different things.  And Mac laptops aren't $2,000. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on July 12, 2004, 11:34:43 am
A good Mac laptop is. Get a Mac if your rich maybe...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 12, 2004, 11:45:31 am
They're all good...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 12, 2004, 03:40:32 pm
Now the mac laptops are good.

Because: Laptops are slower and yet mac apps use less prossesor bw
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 12, 2004, 04:30:39 pm
Quote
I agree. This topic should be closed. its 45 pages of nonsence.
pssh i agree. 600 some replies of "Macs pwn all" "macs are overpriced" "Windows sucks"  blah blah blah
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 12, 2004, 04:32:45 pm
Wow.  I suggest that everyone rereads this whole thread.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 12, 2004, 04:32:59 pm
Quote
Quote
I agree. This topic should be closed. its 45 pages of nonsence.
pssh i agree. 600 some replies of "Macs pwn all" "macs are overpriced" "Windows sucks"  blah blah blah
 :biggrin: Look at that! :biggrin:  He agreed with me!! :biggrin:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 12, 2004, 07:51:43 pm
Im in this too.

Yet i dont got no keys to lock it
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 13, 2004, 07:36:30 am
Quote
Im in this too.

Yet i dont got no keys to lock it
...

What?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 13, 2004, 09:14:53 am
Can you lock this SS this topic is now pointless
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 13, 2004, 10:06:59 am
I just realized something. Everyone who wants this topic locked has either:

A: Never used a Mac before.

B: Only used OS 9.

C: Barely read this thread at all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 13, 2004, 10:11:09 am
OR just completley irratated..
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 13, 2004, 11:01:16 am
Everyone who doesn't know what they're talking about and gets annoyed when they get proven wrong can just leave this topic.  But there's no reason to close it. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Scilla on July 13, 2004, 11:02:33 am
Quote
Everyone who doesn't know what they're talking about and gets annoyed when they get proven wrong can just leave this topic.  But there's no reason to close it. :wink:
ya know what. your right. I know nothing at all about this, so why should I be talking. please..continue posting.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 13, 2004, 11:51:32 am
I think ppl have not get what im saying what i m saying is

Pc units rok mac units suk

Mac os rox windows sux
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 13, 2004, 11:57:43 am
Um, just because they cost more doesn't mean they suck.  It means they're better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 13, 2004, 02:18:31 pm
your wrong. technology that is better is cheaper
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 13, 2004, 02:51:37 pm
Maybe so.  But a Macintosh computer is not "a technology." It's a computer. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 13, 2004, 08:23:35 pm
Yeah but it has technology put into it....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 13, 2004, 09:06:23 pm
Well if you want to get into an argument about that, then go right ahead.  The technology that Apple puts in their computers is far more advanced than what Dell, Gateway, etc do.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 13, 2004, 09:15:56 pm
Dudemen, a Macintosh computer, or any Apple product for that matter, is not a computer, or a technology. It is a work of art. You can get less attractive art for around $700, but they won't run Mac OS, or OS X. And a lot of PC users I know would like to use OS X on their PC. But having Apple do that would burn Apple to ashes. So you get either a mediocre piece of art with not-so-good OS, or a very nice piece of art with a much better OS. Most people aren't willing to pay the price for beauty. :original:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 14, 2004, 11:12:27 am
Quote
Quote
Tommorow im gonna ask my comp whiz dad a whole bunch of ?
 :tongue:
That should probably be: my comp-whiz-windoze-biased-what-are-macs-?-close-minded-when-it-comes-to-computing-platforms dad

And, uh, the intelligent people in this conversation are the one's who don't ask their parents tech questions; rather, their parents ask them :tongue: :biggrin: j/p
Well obviosly your parrents are ignorant. My Dad has been working with comps for I dont even know how long. He has more knowledge than you or anyone on this fourm  :tongue:

SO dont even be talking about my father that way. He would outsmart you  :tongue:

Im gonna start this comp trivia thing

What is PCI express?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 14, 2004, 11:23:34 am
I think cmonkey could outsmart him. :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 14, 2004, 11:40:38 am
.... maybe....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 14, 2004, 06:48:46 pm
Cmonkey could outsmart anyone on computers. :ph34r:

If you want to make a comp trivia, don't hijack this thread. >_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 14, 2004, 07:07:25 pm
uhhh dude don't say that unless you know it

im saying my dad knows alot and know it

also i think my dad is older than any kids or teens dad on this fourm

what do youi mean by hijacking
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 14, 2004, 07:23:17 pm
I'm talking about hijacking as in changing the subject.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 14, 2004, 10:31:57 pm
Compbrain could outsmart me in most of the areas of computing.  Korax,  start a new thread for trivia.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 14, 2004, 11:39:16 pm
Quote
Well obviosly your parrents are ignorant. My Dad has been working with comps for I dont even know how long. He has more knowledge than you or anyone on this fourm  :tongue:

SO dont even be talking about my father that way. He would outsmart you  :tongue:
Hey, I'm not saying anything against your Dad, just playin' with ya :biggrin: I'm sure he's a bright man. So are my parents - my Dad has a Masters degree. But thats not what this thread is about.

Your Dad could outsmart me - or maybe not. We don't know. Same w/ Cmonkey or anyone else. I mean no disrespect - but I'm know what I'm talking about more often than not. I can hold my tongue :tongue: :happy:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 15, 2004, 01:41:26 pm
Same w/my dad  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 15, 2004, 01:42:24 pm
Macs are great computers, but I'm not going to spend that for a personal computer. Now for a business computer, maybe.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 15, 2004, 05:07:44 pm
I looked at the g5 it P,o'ed me because they dont even tell you how it is faster. :angry: and it is not by prossesor bandwidth. If it was it would take longer to load and be the same or take faster and be crap
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 15, 2004, 05:15:12 pm
http://www.apple.com/powermac/ (http://www.apple.com/powermac/)

I'm sure that will tell you a lot...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 15, 2004, 09:03:54 pm
oh.

But it seems pointless screw buying it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MiraclrPlz on July 17, 2004, 09:43:58 am
I say PC.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 17, 2004, 10:00:43 am
why do you say PC? any reasons?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 18, 2004, 03:34:42 pm
Quote
Macs are great computers, but I'm not going to spend that for a personal computer. Now for a business computer, maybe.
I don't know about all you but i've seen alot of buisnesses use dells.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 18, 2004, 05:56:05 pm
Quote
Quote
Macs are great computers, but I'm not going to spend that for a personal computer. Now for a business computer, maybe.
I don't know about all you but i've seen alot of buisnesses use dells.
Some businesses had to put lots of Money down the toilet because of Dell.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 18, 2004, 07:42:06 pm
Thats why we should always order blank dells with no OS and put them on ourselfs
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 19, 2004, 08:44:03 pm
Businesses order Dells because Dell gives decent prices to small businesses / large businesses / schools, and they provide support.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 19, 2004, 09:25:37 pm
Once again a good post by cmonkey
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 19, 2004, 09:41:26 pm
And you're saying Apple doesn't? :wacko: Where have you been?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 19, 2004, 10:01:17 pm
Haha. I saw on the Apple's site for the goverment or something, they were selling the Dual 2GHz G5 for about $2,000. And that was BEFORE the 2.5 edition. \m/
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 20, 2004, 08:55:54 am
The average school can't afford to pay $2,000 for one computer when they can get four computers for $500 each instead.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 20, 2004, 09:37:24 am
Quote
The average school can't afford to pay $2,000 for one computer when they can get four computers for $500 each instead.
Ummm... That was a G5, and that was for the government. Schools can buy Combo Drive eMacs for $700, which is alot better discount than Dell gives.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 20, 2004, 09:38:21 am
Let's see.

4 computers for $500, or 1 for $700.... that's a hard choice.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 20, 2004, 09:41:10 am
Quote
Let's see.

4 computers for $500, or 1 for $700.... that's a hard choice.
Not 4 Dells for $500, 4 Dells for $500 EACH. And they don't really give good discounts anyway.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 20, 2004, 11:29:38 am
You've gotta be pretty stupid if you think that you're actually gonna get something good for $500.  Oh wait, 4 for $500?  My bad, that $125 computer must be really good.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 20, 2004, 11:48:47 am
Dude it actually is my brother has a power edge 4005sc and it has not crashed once seriosly and it only cost $300 for

2.0ghz celoron
80gb ide
64mb ati somethinarother
intergrated everything xcept video

yet my dad
added a 120gb ide hdd
took out the 64mb vid card and replaced with a 128mb nividia 5200

same with me it has not crashed once!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 20, 2004, 11:57:49 am
Quote
You've gotta be pretty stupid if you think that you're actually gonna get something good for $500.  Oh wait, 4 for $500?  My bad, that $125 computer must be really good.
plankton the evil one(SZ member) has a dell and it's just great. It's a really good computer.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongedude on July 20, 2004, 12:23:35 pm
A Dell is probably the best brand PC - but if you want a good computer, you're going to pay for it, and $125, even $500, is not a good computer, thank you :rolleyes:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 20, 2004, 12:26:55 pm
Oh yes it is unless it is not amd i dont know it :glare:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 20, 2004, 12:29:22 pm
Exactly.  Just about everyone doesn't know it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 20, 2004, 12:43:14 pm
Notice I said $500 EACH.  Anyway,  I hate Dells.  It is easily possible to make a good computer for $500

$50 Nforce2 mobo
$75 512mb pc3200
$75 Athlon XP-m 2400+
$30 some nice heatsink and a few fans
$80 160gb hard drive
$100 9600 pro
$60 a decent case with PSU
$20 a CD-RW drive
$10 a floppy drive

$500

$600 if you want a 17 inch CRT too.

BTW, that is an overclocking and gaming rig. I could build a regular box for a LOT less.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 20, 2004, 12:47:01 pm
Floppy drive?  CRT?  Whatever happened to CD-ROM and LCD?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 20, 2004, 12:53:24 pm
There is a CD-ROM in there...  Anyway, many people still use floppy disks (including myself).  They are useful for flashing bios, doing a net install of debian, etc, etc.  As for the LCD vs. CRT debate,  I'm manly enough to carry a heavy CRT to a LAN party, I don't live inside a cramped cubicle where there is only a 5 inch deep desk, and my electricity is cheap enough for the power savings not to matter, so I have no need for an LCD.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 20, 2004, 01:29:07 pm
Lcd monitors are pointless.

I still use floppy disx 2

If you want the least amount of weight on a monitor turn the faceplate twards you.

you know what my computer teacher will never admit he is wrong. He said a computer monitor explodes because it is producing a whole bunch of electricity and when you shoot it drop it etc. the + and - connect and it blows up.

when actually inside the vaccum there is no air because when the RGB guns are oxidised they are dissrupted by pressure and dont work. so when you drop it. the air gets back in taking the glass with it and other sstuff so it implodes
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 20, 2004, 02:49:56 pm
Quote
When actually inside the vaccum, there is no air because when the RGB guns are oxidized they are disrupted by pressure and don't work. So when you drop it. The air gets back in taking the glass with it and other stuff so it implodes.
What does that have to do with anything? :huh:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 20, 2004, 02:54:46 pm
Quote
Notice I said $500 EACH.  Anyway,  I hate Dells.  It is easily possible to make a good computer for $500

$50 Nforce2 mobo
$75 512mb pc3200
$75 Athlon XP-m 2400+
$30 some nice heatsink and a few fans
$80 160gb hard drive
$100 9600 pro
$60 a decent case with PSU
$20 a CD-RW drive
$10 a floppy drive

$500

$600 if you want a 17 inch CRT too.

BTW, that is an overclocking and gaming rig. I could build a regular box for a LOT less.
Yeah, my box was cheap to build, though my dad already had the radeon and AMD lying around. Without those costs, it was $300. LCD's aren't that great. I don't notice much difference, except for price.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 20, 2004, 04:35:32 pm
Quote
As for the LCD vs. CRT debate,  I'm manly enough to carry a heavy CRT to a LAN party, I don't live inside a cramped cubicle where there is only a 5 inch deep desk, and my electricity is cheap enough for the power savings not to matter, so I have no need for an LCD.
Um, I don't care about carying it around... I was talking about the actual screen.  LCD is better than CRT.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 20, 2004, 04:37:07 pm
LCD is also a lot more money when you don't really need one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on July 20, 2004, 05:15:41 pm
Each is good and bad in its own ways http://www.techmind.org/lcd/ (http://www.techmind.org/lcd/).  LCD's have better contrast and sharpness, but worse color accuracy, slower pixel response speeds (very important for gaming), and a smaller viewing angle.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MiraclrPlz on July 20, 2004, 05:17:56 pm
Exactly.  Each has it own faults.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 21, 2004, 05:39:20 pm
Question! Can you get a Mac customized?  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 21, 2004, 05:50:10 pm
Quote
Question! Can you get a Mac customized?
Yes you can. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 22, 2004, 12:55:54 pm
Yeah but it still costs over $800 for less stuff
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 22, 2004, 08:23:25 pm
Quote
Yeah but it still costs over $800 for less stuff
But it's all the stuff you really need at all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 22, 2004, 11:50:34 pm
Quote
Quote
Yeah but it still costs over $800 for less stuff
But it's all the stuff you really need at all.
No one needs that good of a computer for personal use.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 23, 2004, 08:57:30 am
Quote
No one needs that good of a computer for personal use.
:-|

Actually, lots of people do. :mellow:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on July 23, 2004, 09:01:57 am
I don't. I like burning CDs and DVDs. Playing games. Going online. I don't really do anything else. I don't need to either.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 23, 2004, 12:12:24 pm
nope you need more
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 27, 2004, 07:45:38 pm
Quote
Quote
No one needs that good of a computer for personal use.
:-|

Actually, lots of people do. :mellow:
Yeah.  Most people do.  Not everyone's the same as you. @_@
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 27, 2004, 08:10:48 pm
no duh dude

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 27, 2004, 11:29:18 pm
Get an Emachines PC...less than $600 :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on July 28, 2004, 07:03:42 am
I didn't get to use it, but a few days ago I saw a newer Mac with OS 10 on it. I may end up using it for college purposes.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 28, 2004, 07:40:53 am
Quote
Get an Emachines PC...less than $600 :lol:
How unbiased... <_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 28, 2004, 10:25:04 am
Quote
Get an Emachines PC...less than $600 :lol:
Uhhh dude I no i m not a mod but ur not posed to advertise
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on July 28, 2004, 10:41:21 am
Quote
Quote
Get an Emachines PC...less than $600 :lol:
Uhhh dude I no i m not a mod but ur not posed to advertise
He didn't advertise Korax. He just mentioned an Emachine.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 28, 2004, 10:51:43 am
MY ad`
 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on July 29, 2004, 09:36:20 pm
Quote
MY ad`
Spellcheck wouldn't be a bad idea Korax. -_-
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 30, 2004, 09:49:27 am
Sorry at that time i had to take a poopie really baddie
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 31, 2004, 07:06:26 pm
To quote from another topic.
Quote
We do...they just too dang expensive
That's what you do not understand.  Don't try to prove me wrong. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 31, 2004, 07:08:02 pm
Too expensive may be a good thing but like another member said...they have too many problems on their mac :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 31, 2004, 07:10:38 pm
Yur right thats why you should get a oc unit and install mac os on thatyet im still not switching

WHat happened to a mac user (delete this if it is against the rulz) (http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/apple.php)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 31, 2004, 07:16:58 pm
HAHAHAHA! It made him gay...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 31, 2004, 07:20:48 pm
So kids stay away from evil mac
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 31, 2004, 08:27:13 pm
Or any in that matter :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on July 31, 2004, 08:32:56 pm
*sigh* What's it gonna take for you guys to the simple facts through you're head?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 31, 2004, 08:40:29 pm
*cough* too expensive *cough*
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on July 31, 2004, 08:42:43 pm
Quote
*sigh* What's it gonna take for you guys to the simple facts through you're head?
Spongey, do you get that they don't care what you think? Or are you gonna post 200 more posts saying it?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 31, 2004, 08:46:34 pm
I care what he thinks...its just I like and have opinions on PC
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 01, 2004, 10:33:33 am
IM starting to suspect SPongey34 is doing this for post count reasons
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 01, 2004, 10:36:03 am
:blink: And you aren't, Korax?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 01, 2004, 10:37:26 am
No im fast posting its where i post really fast but im not spamming

Any how, im not getting a mac end of story  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 01, 2004, 10:50:34 am
Quote
IM starting to suspect SPongey34 is doing this for post count reasons
haha, good one.  I could care less about how many posts I have.  If I really wanted it to be high, I would've posted like crazy in the games forum, when it still added to your post count.  All I'm doing is stating the facts, but everyone seems to be oblivious to them, so I say them over and over.  Not that I want to, but there's nothing wrong with that.  People gain more knowlege through repetition than anything else.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 01, 2004, 10:55:09 am
Quote
Quote
IM starting to suspect SPongey34 is doing this for post count reasons
haha, good one.  I could care less about how many posts I have.  If I really wanted it to be high, I would've posted like crazy in the games forum, when it still added to your post count.  All I'm doing is stating the facts, but everyone seems to be oblivious to them, so I say them over and over.  Not that I want to, but there's nothing wrong with that.  People gain more knowlege through repetition than anything else.
Um... okay whatever  :wacko:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 01, 2004, 11:00:14 am
Quote
Quote
IM starting to suspect SPongey34 is doing this for post count reasons
haha, good one.  I could care less about how many posts I have.  If I really wanted it to be high, I would've posted like crazy in the games forum, when it still added to your post count.  All I'm doing is stating the facts, but everyone seems to be oblivious to them, so I say them over and over.  Not that I want to, but there's nothing wrong with that.  People gain more knowlege through repetition than anything else.
Lol. That's like me. I'm so sad I'm at like 1,300. =-(
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 01, 2004, 12:39:31 pm
I respect ya barnacleman :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 02, 2004, 01:44:06 pm
Quote
I respect ya barnacleman :lol:
Ummm... Right. Whatever. What does that have to with :::::: Conversation?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 05, 2004, 01:53:21 pm
I respect Spongey34 apparently no one else does
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 06, 2004, 12:32:52 pm
Unless someone does and no one knows it

This topik is wearing out
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 06, 2004, 12:34:59 pm
Thats because Spongey has gotten tired of no one believing him. But I do. I'm just a bigger PC fan
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 08, 2004, 10:44:10 am
Basicly a lot of ppl here are pc fans because the can't afford a mac. My school is poor as H,e hokey stix

So they have no choice but to use pc's yet they have the old macs
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 08, 2004, 11:24:04 am
It's called an educational discount.  And even if Apple didn't offer them, it would still be more cost effective to buy Macs for a school, than PCs.  Good schools, including colleges, use Macs.  Students who use Macs are more creative and get better grades.  That's a fact.  If you don't have the facts, don't say anything.  Do yourself a favor. :wink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 08, 2004, 11:32:49 am
Nope even that even if our district bought them. Kids would destroy them and they waould have to spend a whole bunch of money 2 get them fixed.

My bros friend said that more video software is comming out to pc's. he is probbaly lying

edit: asked my dad if we can switch to mac. Answer HN dont no y
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 08, 2004, 11:38:31 am
Um, "Nope even that even if our district bought them," and so forth is a little hard to comprehend, but I'll try my best.
Kids don't destroy them.  They use them to their advantage.  Unlike PCs, which by the way, are much more vulnerable to being "destroyed."  And they don't spend a bunch of money to get them fixed.  They don't need to be fixed...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 08, 2004, 11:43:56 am
No seriosly they slam the cd rom drive shut they put gunk in them and in the floppydrive. thewy would. Uggh too much to explain.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 08, 2004, 11:48:57 am
Okay... all schools have immature people who can't handle themselves.  How does that have anything to do with Macs/PCs?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 08, 2004, 11:58:33 am
Im saying. they would be toast before we even really got to use them.

Yet if there is a computer company that is willing to give up old macs, we might get them
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 11, 2004, 01:08:10 pm
My moms school has Mac's 8.6 version...it sux the biggest...they need to upgrade. The teachers have Dells while the students use macs
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 11, 2004, 01:24:11 pm
Woah :ohmy:

Man I have the mac classic Old huh?

Whoah :excl: running out of hydrolix gotta leave. LOL!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 11, 2004, 05:13:54 pm
Quote
My moms school has Mac's 8.6 version...it sux the biggest...they need to upgrade. The teachers have Dells while the students use macs
That's the problem, you're living in the past foo.  You and other haters base their opinion on "Well, um, I used a Mac 5 years ago in my school... I think it was OS 7." and then you say Macs suck. Um, no.  Get Mac OS X 10.3.5... beter yet, wait until 10.4.  Then you'll realize that you were the crazy one, and not me.  And about it "being too expensive," OS X is cheaper than XP.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 11, 2004, 05:36:58 pm
Quote
Quote
My moms school has Mac's 8.6 version...it sux the biggest...they need to upgrade. The teachers have Dells while the students use macs
That's the problem, you're living in the past foo.  You and other haters base their opinion on "Well, um, I used a Mac 5 years ago in my school... I think it was OS 7." and then you say Macs suck. Um, no.  Get Mac OS X 10.3.5... beter yet, wait until 10.4.  Then you'll realize that you were the crazy one, and not me.  And about it "being too expensive," OS X is cheaper than XP.
You mean Os x is cheaper than Xp profeshinal last saw home was about $100

Psssh. Man If i switched to a mac i couldnt run doom3 even in virtual PC.

Requires at least a 1.5 ghz amd

Im telling you people with microsoft it's all about the money but yet even with mac it is all about the money.

Question doe's mac still suport older versions of mac OS?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 11, 2004, 05:58:00 pm
I dunno if that's even true, but Home ain't gonna get you anywhere.  Wait, neither is Pro. :laugh:

I believe it's coming out for Macs soon... but why use a computer for games?

Let's put it this way: M$ (notice the $) cares more about the money than the product.  They're the "most popular," and they think everything revolves around them, so they just make up some crap, and sell it.  Then the people, who are just as ignorant as them, buy it.  Apple on the other hand, actually makes quality stuff.  They're the ones who put some time and effort into making a good product as to actually pull people away from the crazed world of Micrsoft that they're stuck in.  And when someone smarts comes around and buys one of their products, they're actually rightfully earning the money.

Yes.  I'm running OS X and OS 9 right now.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 11, 2004, 07:00:47 pm
Quote
I dunno if that's even true, but Home ain't gonna get you anywhere.  Wait, neither is Pro. :laugh:

I believe it's coming out for Macs soon... but why use a computer for games?

Let's put it this way: M$ (notice the $) cares more about the money than the product.  They're the "most popular," and they think everything revolves around them, so they just make up some crap, and sell it.  Then the people, who are just as ignorant as them, buy it.  Apple on the other hand, actually makes quality stuff.  They're the ones who put some time and effort into making a good product as to actually pull people away from the crazed world of Micrsoft that they're stuck in.  And when someone smarts comes around and buys one of their products, they're actually rightfully earning the money.

Yes.  I'm running OS X and OS 9 right now.
Well i mean like way older versions like from 1996

Why do you think my dad is a linux fan? Becuase the PWN all

Nope dont look like it news around the web says availible for Pc comming soon to xbox

Because I am a gamer. Yet if i was more of a movie fantic i would put Mac os on my PC

Okay if home dont get you anywhere why do you tink im on the www?  :tongue:


 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 11, 2004, 08:58:28 pm
Dunno.  I'm still trying to figure out whether your asking if today's Macintosh computers support outdated OSs, or if Apple still supports those outdated OSs.

How did Linux get into this?

Um, it's called a game console.

Pssh.  Anyone can write something that allows you to get on the net.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 11, 2004, 10:13:15 pm
Quote
Dunno.  I'm still trying to figure out whether your asking if today's Macintosh computers support outdated OSs, or if Apple still supports those outdated OSs.
http://www.apple-history.com/ (http://www.apple-history.com/)

Hope that can be of help.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 12, 2004, 08:14:23 am
Quote
Dunno.  I'm still trying to figure out whether your asking if today's Macintosh computers support outdated OSs, or if Apple still supports those outdated OSs.

How did Linux get into this?

Um, it's called a game console.

Pssh.  Anyone can write something that allows you to get on the net.
Apple supports old os's

I dont know it just pwns all

I dont like consoles i only play NES

Yeah but in like 2 years of programming

Ot: i ditched se 6.0 and downloaded a real browser Opera

***edit*** I looked at the history. Woah macs didnt have the good looks till 98

and yet the Imac in 98 was way behind the word Ghz exsisted then
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 12, 2004, 04:31:52 pm
Quote
http://www.apple-history.com/ (http://www.apple-history.com/)

Hope that can be of help.
Yeah, cool site, but I already knew the answers.  I was just trying to figure out which question to answer...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 13, 2004, 09:54:11 am
Woah that site was weird
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on August 14, 2004, 05:09:20 pm
Quote
Dunno.  I'm still trying to figure out whether your asking if today's Macintosh computers support outdated OSs, or if Apple still supports those outdated OSs.

How did Linux get into this?

Um, it's called a game console.

Pssh.  Anyone can write something that allows you to get on the net.
PC gaming is better for online. No doubt. And plus, not everyone can afford to buy new Xbox games. PC you can download. ^_^
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongemonkey13 on August 14, 2004, 05:17:47 pm
pc is what i have so i guess i prefer that
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 14, 2004, 05:53:31 pm
Quote
PC you can download. ^_^
You can download the free trial stuff.  If you want the real thing, you have to pay for it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on August 14, 2004, 06:08:03 pm
There are a lot of good free games.  RTCW: Enemy Territory is free/good.  So is MU: Online ( a MMORPG).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 14, 2004, 06:13:40 pm
I know that... I have some too. :sleep:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on August 14, 2004, 06:43:30 pm
Quote
Quote
PC you can download. ^_^
You can download the free trial stuff.  If you want the real thing, you have to pay for it.
Dude, I download games like people download music. I've already got Doom 3.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 14, 2004, 07:00:19 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
PC you can download. ^_^
You can download the free trial stuff.  If you want the real thing, you have to pay for it.
Dude, I download games like people download music. I've already got Doom 3.
You got doom3 You rok

900th post

anyhow

also americas army
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on August 14, 2004, 08:00:23 pm
Oh yea,  I forgot about America's Army.  That is a really good free online game.  It is entirely possible to play fun games legally without paying.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 14, 2004, 09:28:57 pm
Quote
pc is what i have so i guess i prefer that
You've said that 3 times.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 15, 2004, 10:37:09 am
Quote
Oh yea,  I forgot about America's Army.  That is a really good free online game.  It is entirely possible to play fun games legally without paying.
My dads friend plays that game all the time. now that doom3 is out he is online gaming with that

 
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 17, 2004, 05:03:20 pm
Windows XP has all these great updates you need to know about :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 17, 2004, 05:40:03 pm
I do know about them.  Do you know about Mac OS X's updates?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 19, 2004, 07:02:19 am
Would you put a screen shot on?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: MEEP! on August 21, 2004, 01:54:11 pm
Today's Show comic made me think of this topic. (http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20040820/ltmsho040821.gif)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: DoodleBob on August 21, 2004, 02:57:00 pm
haha! PCs are better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: foulpattie on August 21, 2004, 03:05:30 pm
Quote
Oh yea,  I forgot about America's Army.  That is a really good free online game.  It is entirely possible to play fun games legally without paying.
My friend gave me a free disc of Americas Army. I haven't tried it yet but i think it was created by the military and put online.  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: livestoSURF on August 21, 2004, 04:05:28 pm
I prefer a PC
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on August 21, 2004, 05:49:44 pm
Yea, it was published by the Army to get people more interested in it.  Thats why the game is free.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 22, 2004, 12:18:02 am
@ DoodleBob and LivestoSURF: Why? Any reasons?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 23, 2004, 12:52:14 pm
I'm just asking this cause I really don't know the answer but would a pc mouse/keyboard go in with a mac computer? I know it sounds like a stupid question but I was just wondering
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 23, 2004, 12:54:34 pm
Quote
I'm just asking this cause I really don't know the answer but would a pc mouse/keyboard go in with a mac computer? I know it sounds like a stupid question but I was just wondering
It depends which one you're talking about. JUst go to the website of the mouse you want to use with the Mac, and see if it's compatible.

I love Microsoft Mice.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 23, 2004, 05:24:28 pm
It depends on if it has USB...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 23, 2004, 10:15:40 pm
Which verison would have that feature O_o;;
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on August 23, 2004, 10:16:24 pm
Pretty much every mouse is a USB mouse.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 23, 2004, 10:29:07 pm
My mouse doesnt...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 24, 2004, 04:30:03 pm
Um, there's no version with a feature... O_o

USB: Universal Serial Bus (if that helps :tongue:)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 24, 2004, 04:30:28 pm
I know what it means/stands for O_o;;
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 02, 2004, 08:29:42 pm
LMAO.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv (http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 02, 2004, 08:39:24 pm
haha. :laugh:

Too bad that doesn't mean anything anymore...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 02, 2004, 09:41:33 pm
That was valid in ancient history, but LMAO!!!!!! :lol:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 02, 2004, 09:50:02 pm
Quote
LMAO.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv (http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv)
No good games for mac O_o;;
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 02, 2004, 11:01:50 pm
Quote
Quote
LMAO.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv (http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv)
No good games for mac O_o;;
Where's the proof?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 03, 2004, 04:40:47 am
Quote
Quote
Quote
LMAO.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv (http://home.cogeco.ca/~tariq/applegamer.wmv)
No good games for mac O_o;;
Where's the proof?
War Craft 3, Zorg, Breakout, Super Breakout...yeah...that's about it
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 03, 2004, 04:20:29 pm
Dudes...

No, that's not it. :wink:

Notice how we said that its outdated.  Its false.

(http://images.apple.com/games/articles/2002/05/galactic/images/galacticquote1.gif)

3D Hearts Deluxe
3D Spades Deluxe
4x4 EVO 2
A-OK! The Wings of Mercury
Active Lancer
Activision Anthology
Age of Empires II: Gold
Age of Mythology
Airburst
AirBurst Extreme
Alchemy
Alias Underground
Aliens vs. Predator 2
Aliens vs. Predator Gold
American McGee’s Alice
America’s Army
Androkids
Andromeda Online
Another War
Arcane Arena
Argonaut
ARR!
Arthur’s 1st Grade
Avalanche
Avernum 3
BabelBloX
Baldur’s Gate II: Shadows of Amn
Baldur’s Gate II: Throne of Bhaal
Battlefield 1942 Deluxe Edition
Bejeweled
The Belt
Big Money Deluxe
Billy Frontier
Birdie Shoot
Black & White
Black & White: Creature Isle
Blades of Avernum
BloodRayne
BombSquad
Bongo Boogie
Bounce Out Blitz
Bubble Trouble X
Bugdom 2
Burning Monkey Casino
Burning Monkey Mahjong Solitaire
Burning Monkey Solitaire 3
Burst
Call of Duty
Candy Cruncher
Captain Bumper
Chainz
Championship Manager 01-02
Championship Manager 4
Chessmaster 9000
Civilization III - Game of the Year Edition
Clive Barker’s Undying
Collapse! Crunch
Coldstone
Command & Conquer Generals
Cosmic Encounter Online
Cro-Mag Rally
CrossCards
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
CyberExtruder
Dark Horizons: Lore
Deimos Rising
Delta Force: Black Hawk Down
Diablo II
Dominions - Priests, Prophets & Pretenders
Doulber Gold
Dragon’s Lair 3D
Drip Drop
Dungeon Siege
Earth 2140
Enemy Engaged
Enigma
Enigmo
Episilon Tahari
Equilibria
Escape Velocity: Nova
Europa Universalis II
EverQuest
F1 Championship Edition
Fallout
Fallout 2
The Feeble Files
Finding Nemo Games
Fly! II
Forma
Freedom Force
Galactic Patrol
Geneforge
Geneforge 2
Germs
Ghost Master
Ghost Recon: Game of the Year Edition
Giants: Citizen Kabuto
Gish
GLTron
Gorky 17
Green Machine
Grizzly Adventure
Gutterball
Halo: Combat Evolved
Harpoon 3
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Hearts of Iron
Heavy Metal F.A.K.K.2
Helix
Heroes of Might and Magic IV
High Roller
Homeworld 2
Icewind Dale
iConquer
The Incredibles
Indiana Jones and the Emperor’s Tomb
Islands Mini-Golf
iPuppets Presents: Colin’s Classic Cards
James Bond 007: Nightfire
Jeopardy! 2
Jinni Zeala
Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer
Kick Off 2002
Kiki the Nano Bot
Knights and Merchants
Law & Order: Dead on the Money
Legion
Lineage
Links Championship Edition
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Lua Lua
MacPuyo 2
Mahjong Solitarus
Marble Blast Gold
Massive Assault
Master of Orion III
Max Payne
Maximum Pool
Maya Personal Learning Edition
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
Medal of Honor: Breakthrough
Medal of Honor: Spearhead
Mind Rover
Monster’s Inc. Games
Mummy Maze Deluxe
Mutant Storm
Myst III: Exile
Myth II: Soulblighter
Myth III: The Wolf Age
Nanosaur II: Hatchling
NASCAR 2002
NASCAR 2003
Neverwinter Nights
Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark
Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide
NHL Eastside Hockey Manager
NoLimits Rollercoaster Simulation
No One Lives Forever
No One Lives Forever 2
Oni
Only Mortal
Orbz
Otto Matic
Owari
Payback
Pillars of Garendall
Player Manager 2003
Pocket Tanks
Ponere
pop-pop
Power Chips
QBz
Quake
Quake II
Quake III: Gold
Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield
Rayman 3: Hoodlum Havoc
realMYST
Red Faction
Republic: The Revolution
Return to Castle Wolfenstein
Riddle of the Sphinx II: The Omega Stone
RHEM
Sacrifice
Scramble
Second Life
Seven Seas Deluxe
Shadowbane
Shadowbane: The Rise of Chaos
Shape Shifter
Sheep
Shrek 2
Sim Theme Park
SimCity 4
SimCity 4: Rush Hour
Simon Extreme
Simon the Sorcerer II
The Sims
The Sims: Hot Date
The Sims: House Party
The Sims: Livin’ Large
The Sims: Makin’ Magic
The Sims: Superstar
The Sims: Unleashed
The Sims: Vacation
Sin Gold
Slope Rider
Slots from Bally Gaming
Snowball Run
Solace
Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix
Solitaire Till Dawn X
Space Colony
Spelvin
Spider-Man
Spin Crisis
SpyHunter
Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force
Star Trek: Elite Force II
Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds
Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns
Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy
Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast
Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic
StarCraft
Stronghold
Super Collapse! II
Super GameHouse Collection 2
Super GameHouse Solitaire 3
Super Jigsaw
Super Jigsaw Butterflies
Super Mah Jong
Super Pop&Drop
Super SpongeBob Collapse!
Survivor
Sveerz
ThinkTanks
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2003
Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell
Tomb Raider: Chronicles
Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 2
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 3
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 4
Total Immersion Racing
ToySight
Tranquility
Tron 2.0
Tropico: Mucho Macho
Universal Hint System
Unreal Tournament 2003
Unreal Tournament 2004
Uplink
Vector3 (Chess)
Virtual Grand Prix 2
XIII
Wakeboarding Unleashed
WarBirds III
Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Warrior Kings
Wheel of Fortune 2
WingNuts
WingNuts 2
Wipeout 2097
Word Up
World War II Online
Worms 3D
Worms Blast
X-Plane
X-Words Deluxe
X2: Wolverine’s Revenge
Yohoho! Puzzle Pirates
Youngs Modulus
Zoo Tycoon
Zoo Tycoon: Marine Mania
Zork: Grand Inquisitor
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 03, 2004, 04:59:50 pm
Quote
Dudes...

No, that's not it. :wink:

Notice how we said that its outdated.  Its false.

(http://images.apple.com/games/articles/2002/05/galactic/images/galacticquote1.gif)

3D Hearts Deluxe
3D Spades Deluxe
4x4 EVO 2
A-OK! The Wings of Mercury
Active Lancer
Activision Anthology
Age of Empires II: Gold
Age of Mythology
Airburst
AirBurst Extreme
Alchemy
Alias Underground
Aliens vs. Predator 2
Aliens vs. Predator Gold
American McGee’s Alice
America’s Army
Androkids
Andromeda Online
Another War
Arcane Arena
Argonaut
ARR!
Arthur’s 1st Grade
Avalanche
Avernum 3
BabelBloX
Baldur’s Gate II: Shadows of Amn
Baldur’s Gate II: Throne of Bhaal
Battlefield 1942 Deluxe Edition
Bejeweled
The Belt
Big Money Deluxe
Billy Frontier
Birdie Shoot
Black & White
Black & White: Creature Isle
Blades of Avernum
BloodRayne
BombSquad
Bongo Boogie
Bounce Out Blitz
Bubble Trouble X
Bugdom 2
Burning Monkey Casino
Burning Monkey Mahjong Solitaire
Burning Monkey Solitaire 3
Burst
Call of Duty
Candy Cruncher
Captain Bumper
Chainz
Championship Manager 01-02
Championship Manager 4
Chessmaster 9000
Civilization III - Game of the Year Edition
Clive Barker’s Undying
Collapse! Crunch
Coldstone
Command & Conquer Generals
Cosmic Encounter Online
Cro-Mag Rally
CrossCards
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
CyberExtruder
Dark Horizons: Lore
Deimos Rising
Delta Force: Black Hawk Down
Diablo II
Dominions - Priests, Prophets & Pretenders
Doulber Gold
Dragon’s Lair 3D
Drip Drop
Dungeon Siege
Earth 2140
Enemy Engaged
Enigma
Enigmo
Episilon Tahari
Equilibria
Escape Velocity: Nova
Europa Universalis II
EverQuest
F1 Championship Edition
Fallout
Fallout 2
The Feeble Files
Finding Nemo Games
Fly! II
Forma
Freedom Force
Galactic Patrol
Geneforge
Geneforge 2
Germs
Ghost Master
Ghost Recon: Game of the Year Edition
Giants: Citizen Kabuto
Gish
GLTron
Gorky 17
Green Machine
Grizzly Adventure
Gutterball
Halo: Combat Evolved
Harpoon 3
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Hearts of Iron
Heavy Metal F.A.K.K.2
Helix
Heroes of Might and Magic IV
High Roller
Homeworld 2
Icewind Dale
iConquer
The Incredibles
Indiana Jones and the Emperor’s Tomb
Islands Mini-Golf
iPuppets Presents: Colin’s Classic Cards
James Bond 007: Nightfire
Jeopardy! 2
Jinni Zeala
Kelly Slater’s Pro Surfer
Kick Off 2002
Kiki the Nano Bot
Knights and Merchants
Law & Order: Dead on the Money
Legion
Lineage
Links Championship Edition
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Lua Lua
MacPuyo 2
Mahjong Solitarus
Marble Blast Gold
Massive Assault
Master of Orion III
Max Payne
Maximum Pool
Maya Personal Learning Edition
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
Medal of Honor: Breakthrough
Medal of Honor: Spearhead
Mind Rover
Monster’s Inc. Games
Mummy Maze Deluxe
Mutant Storm
Myst III: Exile
Myth II: Soulblighter
Myth III: The Wolf Age
Nanosaur II: Hatchling
NASCAR 2002
NASCAR 2003
Neverwinter Nights
Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark
Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide
NHL Eastside Hockey Manager
NoLimits Rollercoaster Simulation
No One Lives Forever
No One Lives Forever 2
Oni
Only Mortal
Orbz
Otto Matic
Owari
Payback
Pillars of Garendall
Player Manager 2003
Pocket Tanks
Ponere
pop-pop
Power Chips
QBz
Quake
Quake II
Quake III: Gold
Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield
Rayman 3: Hoodlum Havoc
realMYST
Red Faction
Republic: The Revolution
Return to Castle Wolfenstein
Riddle of the Sphinx II: The Omega Stone
RHEM
Sacrifice
Scramble
Second Life
Seven Seas Deluxe
Shadowbane
Shadowbane: The Rise of Chaos
Shape Shifter
Sheep
Shrek 2
Sim Theme Park
SimCity 4
SimCity 4: Rush Hour
Simon Extreme
Simon the Sorcerer II
The Sims
The Sims: Hot Date
The Sims: House Party
The Sims: Livin’ Large
The Sims: Makin’ Magic
The Sims: Superstar
The Sims: Unleashed
The Sims: Vacation
Sin Gold
Slope Rider
Slots from Bally Gaming
Snowball Run
Solace
Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix
Solitaire Till Dawn X
Space Colony
Spelvin
Spider-Man
Spin Crisis
SpyHunter
Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force
Star Trek: Elite Force II
Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds
Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns
Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy
Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast
Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic
StarCraft
Stronghold
Super Collapse! II
Super GameHouse Collection 2
Super GameHouse Solitaire 3
Super Jigsaw
Super Jigsaw Butterflies
Super Mah Jong
Super Pop&Drop
Super SpongeBob Collapse!
Survivor
Sveerz
ThinkTanks
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2003
Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell
Tomb Raider: Chronicles
Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 2
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 3
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 4
Total Immersion Racing
ToySight
Tranquility
Tron 2.0
Tropico: Mucho Macho
Universal Hint System
Unreal Tournament 2003
Unreal Tournament 2004
Uplink
Vector3 (Chess)
Virtual Grand Prix 2
XIII
Wakeboarding Unleashed
WarBirds III
Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Warrior Kings
Wheel of Fortune 2
WingNuts
WingNuts 2
Wipeout 2097
Word Up
World War II Online
Worms 3D
Worms Blast
X-Plane
X-Words Deluxe
X2: Wolverine’s Revenge
Yohoho! Puzzle Pirates
Youngs Modulus
Zoo Tycoon
Zoo Tycoon: Marine Mania
Zork: Grand Inquisitor
Not as cool as on the PC
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on September 03, 2004, 05:58:21 pm
Someone said they own Tropico i think. I have Tropico 2: Pirate Cove. It takes up more space than The Sims with NO expansion packs. I think even more than The Sims 2! Tropico 2, just came out in late 2003. I have a PC, although Mac, does hold a lot more, and it is rare they crash, isn't it. I like PC better, though.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 03, 2004, 06:02:04 pm
PC's rarely crash either. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on September 04, 2004, 08:19:12 am
Anyone check out the new G5 iMac yet?  That thing looks pretty cool.  I'd much rather have a dual g5 PowerMac though.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Squiddy on September 04, 2004, 09:59:33 am
Id get any Mac....but I couldn't afford it...all I got is a paper route!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 04, 2004, 10:46:50 am
The new iMac looks cool, but it dosen't have the power I would need. Not even close.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 04, 2004, 02:21:09 pm
Quote
Anyone check out the new G5 iMac yet?  That thing looks pretty cool.  I'd much rather have a dual g5 PowerMac though.
Yeah, it looks awesome.  It seems to be about twice as good as my current iMac, which is only a few years old.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ..::PatrickStar::.. on September 05, 2004, 02:36:51 pm
Quote

Well, I hate macintosh computers. They suck, and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple. And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
well said :cool:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 05, 2004, 02:42:16 pm
Quote
Quote

Well, I hate macintosh computers. They suck, and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple. And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
well said :cool:
Do you have any reasons to back yourself up? :blink:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 05, 2004, 03:10:45 pm
That was not well said at all... :blink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on September 05, 2004, 03:53:45 pm
Quote
That was not well said at all... :blink:
Yet, thats in your opinion... :blink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 05, 2004, 04:01:33 pm
Quote
Quote
That was not well said at all... :blink:
Yet, thats in your opinion... :blink:
Well, of course. Who's opinion WOULD it be?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 05, 2004, 04:10:49 pm
And what everyone else says is not? :blink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Starr2k3 on September 05, 2004, 06:51:25 pm
I mean, Spongey posted it like a fact not an opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 06, 2004, 09:11:45 pm
Okay... to back up my opinion.  This is why I believe it is not well said.

Quote
Well, I hate macintosh computers.
Okay, good topic sentence.
Quote
They suck,
If that's your opinion, then fine.  But I really wonder sometimes.
Quote
and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple.
Yeah, spelling would be nice.  Anyway, that is 100% false. Oh, yes it is.
Quote
And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
If you game some guy a Mac and he actually used it for any more than just 7 days, he'd wanna throw his PC out the window.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 09, 2004, 06:36:16 pm
Quote
Okay... to back up my opinion.  This is why I believe it is not well said.

Quote
Well, I hate macintosh computers.
Okay, good topic sentence.
Quote
They suck,
If that's your opinion, then fine.  But I really wonder sometimes.
Quote
and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple.
Yeah, spelling would be nice.  Anyway, that is 100% false. Oh, yes it is.
Quote
And I used Macs for 7 years. They suck.
If you game some guy a Mac and he actually used it for any more than just 7 days, he'd wanna throw his PC out the window.
The last one is pure opinion Spongey
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 09, 2004, 06:50:06 pm
Quote
Quote
and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple.
Yeah, spelling would be nice.  Anyway, that is 100% false. Oh, yes it is.
 
Oh yes, considering I only spelt one word wrong. <_<

You can only get new ones from apple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 09, 2004, 06:53:44 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
and all the hardware is propritary(sp?), meaning you can only get it from Apple.
Yeah, spelling would be nice.  Anyway, that is 100% false. Oh, yes it is.
 
Oh yes, considering I only spelt one word wrong. <_<

You can only get new ones from apple.
Eh...macs are only good for OS10
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 09, 2004, 07:46:06 pm
Eh... That was off-topic.

Eh... You need to do some research. There are alot of Apple resellers.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 10, 2004, 02:23:27 pm
Quote
Eh... That was off-topic.

Eh... You need to do some research. There are alot of Apple resellers.
How was that off topic?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 10, 2004, 04:32:28 pm
Quote
The last one is pure opinion Spongey
Yes, I know.  I'm just giving my reasons as to why I disagree with what he said. You could, however, run an experiment, and then have some statistics to truly back it up.


Quote
You can only get new ones from apple.
*sigh*

I'm guessing by "ones" you mean Macs. Yes, Apple makes them, but no, you can get them from very many places.  Also, last time I checked, computers were just one small part of the whole hardware world.  You'd be surprised to find out how many companies there are making hardware and software for Macs... :rolleyes:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 10, 2004, 04:35:14 pm
No one really can produce hardware for a mac. Steve Jobs sued them all. :ph34r:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 10, 2004, 04:46:45 pm
... you really don't know what you're talking about, do you? No one else makes Macs, but lots of the hardware that you can buy for your Mac is not made by Apple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on September 10, 2004, 05:02:28 pm
I do know what I'm talking about.

What kind of hardware do you mean though?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on September 10, 2004, 05:11:05 pm
Eh, you know, the stuff in your comp.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 10, 2004, 06:38:57 pm
Quote
Eh, you know, the stuff in your comp.
That narrows it down to...what...?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 10, 2004, 10:22:02 pm
Hardware can be anything from your mouse, to your keyboard, speakers, printer/scanner, digital camera, etc.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 10, 2004, 10:23:37 pm
Quote
Hardware can be anything from your mouse, to your keyboard, speakers, printer/scanner, digital camera, etc.
Heh...I was kidding O_o;;
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 10, 2004, 10:35:21 pm
I was answering Kevin's question... foo.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 11, 2004, 03:07:17 pm
Quote
I was answering Kevin's question... foo.
Next time verfiy it :w00t:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on September 11, 2004, 04:28:21 pm
...

How could what I said possibly have anything to do with what you said? Pay attention... :blink:

Kevin asked me a question and I answered it. :wacko:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 11, 2004, 05:26:40 pm
Quote
...

How could what I said possibly have anything to do with what you said? Pay attention... :blink:

Kevin asked me a question and I answered it. :wacko:
It could've been directed to me :dry:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: DarkPatrickStar on September 11, 2004, 06:29:23 pm
Quote
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death, with this: 0957890-23450-89234759034278590123475890-47305897234890-5734289673458906790345867890346789257589342657823465789234569823476589234765890237465890234678905237489572389056789023569082346589034657ugh67589324326758923465983689576348925672890056923480568902347589406895675896597823465293805629306589034659236905826739058623894562348905623490856289056389056890236529034856892346589342659082465896234905862348956723890467538925690234865893425678923465978236490523890456238905689023659082346578923468905265490856498032689567892658923569824562893056234895624390625892346543892568902468923465986243095624905649238562934806598234659023456623458923465896234589623494567890345342567983624589634980563479056936824592346597824654293756324657234652783458579349658753456837246578256234875653428675467845367823456587265478234568975678356754678455766756234678565478657846378452658726578562385283465685672367856.  That's a peecee eorror code.
Catching up to this Old Post,

Sorry to say that isn't a "PEE CEE" error, it is a Windows Error when you get the Blue Screen and i Personally think that Windows Sucks and that any PC owner should use Linux  :mellow:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 11, 2004, 07:04:18 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death, with this: 0957890-23450-89234759034278590123475890-47305897234890-5734289673458906790345867890346789257589342657823465789234569823476589234765890237465890234678905237489572389056789023569082346589034657ugh67589324326758923465983689576348925672890056923480568902347589406895675896597823465293805629306589034659236905826739058623894562348905623490856289056389056890236529034856892346589342659082465896234905862348956723890467538925690234865893425678923465978236490523890456238905689023659082346578923468905265490856498032689567892658923569824562893056234895624390625892346543892568902468923465986243095624905649238562934806598234659023456623458923465896234589623494567890345342567983624589634980563479056936824592346597824654293756324657234652783458579349658753456837246578256234875653428675467845367823456587265478234568975678356754678455766756234678565478657846378452658726578562385283465685672367856.  That's a peecee eorror code.
Catching up to this Old Post,

Sorry to say that isn't a "PEE CEE" error, it is a Windows Error when you get the Blue Screen and i Personally think that Windows Sucks and that any PC owner should use Linux  :mellow:
Never have...never will
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Daniel on September 24, 2004, 10:45:39 pm
Quote
Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death, with this: 0957890-23450-89234759034278590123475890-47305897234890-5734289673458906790345867890346789257589342657823465789234569823476589234765890237465890234678905237489572389056789023569082346589034657ugh67589324326758923465983689576348925672890056923480568902347589406895675896597823465293805629306589034659236905826739058623894562348905623490856289056389056890236529034856892346589342659082465896234905862348956723890467538925690234865893425678923465978236490523890456238905689023659082346578923468905265490856498032689567892658923569824562893056234895624390625892346543892568902468923465986243095624905649238562934806598234659023456623458923465896234589623494567890345342567983624589634980563479056936824592346597824654293756324657234652783458579349658753456837246578256234875653428675467845367823456587265478234568975678356754678455766756234678565478657846378452658726578562385283465685672367856.  That's a peecee eorror code. [/QUOTE]
Catching up to this Old Post,

Sorry to say that isn't a "PEE CEE" error, it is a Windows Error when you get the Blue Screen and i Personally think that Windows Sucks and that any PC owner should use Linux  :mellow: [/quote]
 Um, that's interesting. :tongue:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on October 01, 2004, 11:06:52 am
What kind of arguing is that?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: VulturEMaN on October 01, 2004, 06:52:59 pm
Info that I learned in Economics class at school:
(real example in my Economics book)
Mac is made by Apple. Apple is the only company that makes Macs. People that control one specific good and are the only makers of it have unlimited power to do whatever they want with it. Therefore, Apple makes Macs just because they can hold their monopoly of the Macs like a communist country is held by it's government.

Moral:
Macs = Hitler

:p
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on October 15, 2004, 01:07:07 pm
PCs certainly have more software than the Mac but what's important is whether the particular titles you want are available and the Mac has most application areas well covered. With office software, for example, the Mac not only has a version of Microsoft Office called MacOffice but also AppleWorks, an office-like suite that comes free on iMacs. Internet applications such as web browsers, instant messaging and email are plentiful, as are utilities such as anti-virus packages. An area in which Macs once excelled is graphics and video editing but PCs have largely caught up. In fact, Adobe recently decided to release the latest version of its Premiere video-editing software only on the PC. However, games are a different matter. The Mac has a number of titles but it's nowhere near as well catered for as the PC. More niche areas, such as voice recognition, are limited on the Mac. The voice-recognition package Dragon NaturallySpeaking, for example, is available only on the PC. As such, the PC wins when it comes to software availability.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: DM was on fire! on October 20, 2004, 01:38:16 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
PC: Dunno.

Mac: Our Mac has had every error known to man... and then some. One time it said: "This could not be opened because of an error (-3045) has occured."
Not any more, crash's never. My Mac has had only crahsed 5 times in 2 years. And unlike a PeeCee, they don't need safe mode after they crash, they go back to normal. ANd with Mac OS X, it never crash's. PeeCee's crash, and goto a blue screen of death, with this: 0957890-23450-89234759034278590123475890-47305897234890-5734289673458906790345867890346789257589342657823465789234569823476589234765890237465890234678905237489572389056789023569082346589034657ugh67589324326758923465983689576348925672890056923480568902347589406895675896597823465293805629306589034659236905826739058623894562348905623490856289056389056890236529034856892346589342659082465896234905862348956723890467538925690234865893425678923465978236490523890456238905689023659082346578923468905265490856498032689567892658923569824562893056234895624390625892346543892568902468923465986243095624905649238562934806598234659023456623458923465896234589623494567890345342567983624589634980563479056936824592346597824654293756324657234652783458579349658753456837246578256234875653428675467845367823456587265478234568975678356754678455766756234678565478657846378452658726578562385283465685672367856.  That's a peecee eorror code.
Catching up to this Old Post,

Sorry to say that isn't a "PEE CEE" error, it is a Windows Error when you get the Blue Screen and i Personally think that Windows Sucks and that any PC owner should use Linux  :mellow:
Amen Brother, Amen! Linux (definetly Linspire 4.5!) is great, and the version I have, Linspire, can download any program from the Click-n-Run warehouse. You can even download the GIMP. :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on October 20, 2004, 06:47:38 pm
There are bad things to Linux...too many to be exact
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on October 20, 2004, 08:10:34 pm
Not on all distros, SuSE, Mandrake and Fedora Core 3 are the best distros imo.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Daniel on November 05, 2004, 11:42:51 am
What are you talking about? :blink:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 05, 2004, 12:00:44 pm
Quote
What are you talking about? :blink:
Read the posts if you want to know what's going on. Anyways I like macs and pcs the same now and we should talk about the platforms not the oses.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 05, 2004, 12:53:21 pm
The reason that PCs get all the viruses is that the virus programmer is getting more results for their labor. If you want attention, wouldn't you attack the side with the most systems? Very few viruses even exist to attack Macs simply because there arent enough of them to take down.

Secondly, the PC platform runs 100% of all software out there. Even if it isn't the fastest, most stable, etc., it is still the compatability king. Look for any program for the Mac, and you'll find at least 10 PC versions of the same type, all released months earlier.

For this reason, people use PCs. If software companies decide to release good software in numbers for the Mac within a week of when the PC version comes out, people might consider switching. but until then, the PC is the only choice for general use.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 05, 2004, 12:56:30 pm
Quote
The reason that PCs get all the viruses is that the virus programmer is getting more results for their labor. If you want attention, wouldn't you attack the side with the most systems? Very few viruses even exist to attack Macs simply because there arent enough of them to take down.

Secondly, the PC platform runs 100% of all software out there. Even if it isn't the fastest, most stable, etc., it is still the compatability king. Look for any program for the Mac, and you'll find at least 10 PC versions of the same type, all released months earlier.

For this reason, people use PCs. If software companies decide to release good software in numbers for the Mac within a week of when the PC version comes out, people might consider switching. but until then, the PC is the only choice for general use.
1.) The oses that run the pcs get the viruses, not the actually pces, if you had windows and linux dual booting and windows got a virus, it would not affect linux in any way.

2.) Yeah unless it's written for Mac OSes like Yellow Dog.

3.) No Comment.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 05, 2004, 01:09:13 pm
I found this article (http://www.lowendmac.com/myturn/01/1025.html)

When you download a piece of software in Windows , installation is generally straightforward. With Linux, you might be stuck with having to compile the code. Very few computer users are willing to do that

Processors used in PCs are being improved more quickly and than the Power PC chips that Apple uses. Speed differences won't be a significant factor for ordinary users who won't need anything faster than a 400Mhz Mac or 700Mhz PC for email, Internet, etc.

Hard drives on PCs can be partitioned without having to wipe all the data on them. PCs usually have more expansion options. The iMac has limited upgrade options, but if you want more hard disk space or want to add a CD burner you can plug it in via USB or Firewire and they will work. They are often more expensive than the internal CD burners and hard drives for PCs, however the latter are not easy for the ordinary user to install and will probably necessitate  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 05, 2004, 01:10:47 pm
Dude, installing software in linux is just as easy as installing it in but linux exe files have no extension. I was almost able to install firefox in linux but it froze because I only had like 128MB of RAM but if I booted my whole pc to that, it would be installed.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Alain2k5 on November 05, 2004, 02:59:19 pm
Quote
Dude, installing software in linux is just as easy as installing it in but linux exe files have no extension. I was almost able to install firefox in linux but it froze because I only had like 128MB of RAM but if I booted my whole pc to that, it would be installed.
That's different Mozilla pre-compiles.  Other software you download might have to be compiled. You'll need like 3 progs to sucessfully compile it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 05, 2004, 03:03:10 pm
Oh well, most software I use in Linux comes with it and if not I get it from the kde-apps website.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 19, 2004, 04:30:48 pm
Do they have different versions like PC does...home and pro for mac?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 19, 2004, 04:35:59 pm
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...nMore=M9227LL/A (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/initial.woa/wa/browse?ptm=WXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX506201&lprd=http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?productLearnMore=M9227LL/A)
^Single Edition^

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...nMore=M9228LL/A (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/initial.woa/wa/browse?ptm=WXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX506201&lprd=http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?productLearnMore=M9228LL/A)
^Family Edition^
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 19, 2004, 04:55:04 pm
I would think single is better because of the # of accounts :)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 19, 2004, 04:57:27 pm
I'd go with the family edition.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on November 20, 2004, 12:08:35 pm
There's also a sever edition.
Server edition (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/71901/wo/9f2V3cQ0fvMe2IkvmF12peP5GKa/3.0.11.1.0.6.10)
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on November 20, 2004, 12:10:28 pm
Wow...thats a little too expensive...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on November 20, 2004, 12:13:28 pm
They also have a 10 client edition for $500.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 20, 2004, 12:27:28 pm
No offence but I see no point in getting Mac OS X Server, plus it looks more like OS 9 and alot of linux servers are free and you can install it on as many computers as you want.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on November 20, 2004, 05:30:48 pm
The MacOS server is for the XServe anyway.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on November 21, 2004, 04:24:41 pm
Yeah it isn't as great as the normal Mac OS X Panther.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on November 21, 2004, 11:09:14 pm
Quote
When you download a piece of software in Windows, installation is generally straightforward. With Linux, you might be stuck with having to compile the code. Very few computer users are willing to do that.
:dry:

I've used around 20 Linux distros, and the only one I had to compile by myself is Gentoo. So I guess there's safety there.  :-)

Quote
Secondly, the PC platform runs 100% of all software out there.

No, it doesn't. There is lots of software that can't be run on Windows, like some SourceForge projects and many apps in Freshmeat, that was solely made to run on UNIX/Linux systems.

Quote
Yeah it isn't as great as the normal Mac OS X Panther.

Well, not exactly in all cases, because people are getting Macs as a server, and you wouldn't wanna use a OS meant for workstation tasks now, would you? And to the post you made that is a couple lines up, I don't see why it matters what it looks like because no one's going to be using it as a day-to-day system while hooking it up to a monitor and using it as a workstation. And with the Linux server thing, there aren't many server-optimized Linux distrobutions out that will install on the PPC architechture that the Apple computers use.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: partiallynothing on December 13, 2004, 09:11:43 pm
Quote
Quote
Dude, installing software in linux is just as easy as installing it in but linux exe files have no extension. I was almost able to install firefox in linux but it froze because I only had like 128MB of RAM but if I booted my whole pc to that, it would be installed.
That's different Mozilla pre-compiles.  Other software you download might have to be compiled. You'll need like 3 progs to sucessfully compile it.
[snapback]125655[/snapback]

Resolution #1: Use a Linux distro with packages, like Debian, Gentoo, Fedora, etc.

Resolution #2: Any modern uncompiled peace of software includes a make file.  Type "make" then "make install".

Resolution #3: Use google.

Linux is about being able to control what happens on your OS. If you don't care about this, then use Windoww. If you do, use Linux.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 20, 2004, 05:30:37 pm
Traditionally, Apple has been favoured by the less technical user. Graphic designers, for instance are likely to support the Apple camp. At one time, Apple technology certainly had the edge in terms of user friendly design and plug and play features. Nowadays, both PCs and Apples have concentrated on making the user experience as seemless as possible.

On price, PCs have usually had the edge in terms of raw processing power for your money. Apple machines still tend to be a little more expensive to purchase.

However, Apple purchasers rarely make their choice on price alone. They are fiercely loyal to the design ethos of Apple and will perhaps have a greater emotional attachment to their machine. Against this, PC machines usually have a wider choice of software applications. This is simply because PCs are still more widely used and therefore software developers will usually turn to the PC first. However, this is now less of a problem than it used to be.

So you pay your money and you make your choice. It is rare for the user of Apples or PCs to switch allegiances. It comes down to personal priorities and is often more of an emotional than an objective decision.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 20, 2004, 05:48:21 pm
Wow, what a bunch of ignorant stereotypes and lies. O_o
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 20, 2004, 05:50:27 pm
Yet it's all true
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 20, 2004, 05:55:07 pm
It is stereotyping. I am VERY technical, and I prefer Apple's hardware. But it is mildly expensive.

But still, where did you copy and paste that from?

This topic has been pages and pages of nothing of repeated BS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on December 21, 2004, 09:25:11 am
MacOSX is better than Windows XP. X is Unix based, while Windows is still based  on Dos.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 21, 2004, 09:28:35 am
Quote
MacOSX is better than Windows XP. X is Unix based, while Windows is still based  on Dos.
[snapback]138455[/snapback]
Pwn3d, yeah your right Windows is DOS-based while others are UNIX-based.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on December 21, 2004, 09:31:53 am
This is Windows before XP, a 32 bit patch, for a 16 bit shell, a patched 8 bit system, desinged for a 4 bit system.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 21, 2004, 09:41:30 am
Wow, now I hate Windows even more.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on December 21, 2004, 10:06:54 am
Windows XP is basicly 2000 with a ton of bloatware installed on it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 21, 2004, 11:08:57 am
Don't forgot about the different gui in XP.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on December 21, 2004, 12:18:57 pm
There's that too, when ever I'm on a P.C. with XP, I use a plain GUI less memory taken up by pretty graphics.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 21, 2004, 04:05:13 pm
Hey noitce pc stands for Personal Computer

Mac i think stands for Macintosh Apple Computer
Thats probably why its not called a pc Its not personal!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 21, 2004, 07:43:19 pm
No offence but I can't stand using the classic windows look.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 21, 2004, 08:22:04 pm
:huh: what i dont get what you be sayin
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 21, 2004, 08:29:33 pm
He cant use the classic windows 95/98 look
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 21, 2004, 08:36:38 pm
Yeah I don't like it yet i just switched to it and it's a little faster.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 22, 2004, 06:48:24 am
Oh sorry i couldnt understand :sad:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 23, 2004, 01:34:07 pm
Quote
Hey noitce pc stands for Personal Computer

Mac i think stands for Macintosh Apple Computer
Thats probably why its not called a pc Its not personal!
[snapback]138578[/snapback]

Hey, guess what, it is a PC...  :cool:

It is a computer that is built for personal use. Therefore it is a PC. Therefore it is personal.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 26, 2004, 07:51:00 pm
Besides macs suck anyway.

PCs rock you can run more os'es on it and you can run OS X on it with PearPC.

You can have a better machine for less, here is  Red Hat's comparison.
"
Fine
http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore...=&affiliate_id= (http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore.cgi?store=&search=yes&detail=yes&product=SYSTCWFUTURA3000&category=AMDSYSTEMS&keywords=&hits_seen=&page=search.html∧=&affiliate_id=)
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...21.3.1.1.0?37,9 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/71808/wo/886bz4V6gEmj28Ntug41H0AUnAx/1.0.11.1.0.6.9.1.0.21.3.1.1.0?37,9)
PC has a better video card, memory, and bigger hard drive and it's $600 less.
"
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 26, 2004, 08:24:49 pm
Korax, don't copy my posts from other boards on here.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 27, 2004, 11:09:39 am
Quote
Besides macs suck anyway.

PCs rock you can run more os'es on it and you can run OS X on it with PearPC.

You can have a better machine for less, here is  Red Hat's comparison.
"
Fine
http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore...=&affiliate_id= (http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore.cgi?store=&search=yes&detail=yes&product=SYSTCWFUTURA3000&category=AMDSYSTEMS&keywords=&hits_seen=&page=search.html∧=&affiliate_id=)
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...21.3.1.1.0?37,9 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/71808/wo/886bz4V6gEmj28Ntug41H0AUnAx/1.0.11.1.0.6.9.1.0.21.3.1.1.0?37,9)
PC has a better video card, memory, and bigger hard drive and it's $600 less.
"
[snapback]139910[/snapback]

Can I ask you one thing? To quit making up stupid crap, and use a Mac that is running OS X? Then you can be viewed as a somewhat intelligent debater. Besides, there's a big chance that that PC isn't even legal.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on December 27, 2004, 12:07:07 pm
Quote
Besides macs suck anyway.

Let's start giving legitimate reasons to why you dislike something. We were all really happy when you were gone because the Mac vs. PC thread gained some IQ points. Don't bring it down again.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 27, 2004, 02:49:58 pm
Quote
Quote
Besides macs suck anyway.

PCs rock you can run more os'es on it and you can run OS X on it with PearPC.

You can have a better machine for less, here is  Red Hat's comparison.
"
Fine
http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore...=&affiliate_id= (http://www.cheapguys.com/cgi-bin/quikstore.cgi?store=&search=yes&detail=yes&product=SYSTCWFUTURA3000&category=AMDSYSTEMS&keywords=&hits_seen=&page=search.html∧=&affiliate_id=)
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...21.3.1.1.0?37,9 (http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/71808/wo/886bz4V6gEmj28Ntug41H0AUnAx/1.0.11.1.0.6.9.1.0.21.3.1.1.0?37,9)
PC has a better video card, memory, and bigger hard drive and it's $600 less.
"
[snapback]139910[/snapback]

Can I ask you one thing? To quit making up stupid crap, and use a Mac that is running OS X? Then you can be viewed as a somewhat intelligent debater. Besides, there's a big chance that that PC isn't even legal.
[snapback]140006[/snapback]

Stupid crap? My so called stupid crap is true

.....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on December 27, 2004, 05:55:53 pm
I'm not one to debate on computers, but I found this funny.  I found this on the Peanuts website.

To download wallpaper to your computer desktop:

For Windows users:

   1. Click on the resolution that your monitor is set at. (If your resolution isn't shown, choose the closest size.) A new page will appear with just the wallpaper image.
   2. Right click on the image, and a menu will appear.
   3. Choose "set as wallpaper."

For Macintosh users:

   1. Click on the resolution that your monitor is set at. (If your resolution isn't shown, choose the closest size.) A new page will appear with just the wallpaper image.
   2. Move your cursor over the wallpaper image, hold your mouse button down until you see a menu and select "Save This Image As."
   3. In the dialog box that pops up, choose where you'd like to save the image (we suggest your desktop for now).
   4. Go inside your apple menu to control panel, and select "appearance."
   5. In appearance, select Desktop, then click "place picture."
   6. Select the wallpaper file you saved and click "choose." Select "position automatically."
   7. Click "set desktop," close the window, and you're done!

I like the three steps much better. :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 27, 2004, 07:08:47 pm
Quote
I'm not one to debate on computers, but I found this funny.  I found this on the Peanuts website.

To download wallpaper to your computer desktop:

For Windows users:

   1. Click on the resolution that your monitor is set at. (If your resolution isn't shown, choose the closest size.) A new page will appear with just the wallpaper image.
   2. Right click on the image, and a menu will appear.
   3. Choose "set as wallpaper."

For Macintosh users:

   1. Click on the resolution that your monitor is set at. (If your resolution isn't shown, choose the closest size.) A new page will appear with just the wallpaper image.
   2. Move your cursor over the wallpaper image, hold your mouse button down until you see a menu and select "Save This Image As."
   3. In the dialog box that pops up, choose where you'd like to save the image (we suggest your desktop for now).
   4. Go inside your apple menu to control panel, and select "appearance."
   5. In appearance, select Desktop, then click "place picture."
   6. Select the wallpaper file you saved and click "choose." Select "position automatically."
   7. Click "set desktop," close the window, and you're done!

I like the three steps much better. :P
[snapback]140069[/snapback]
This isn't Windows XP vs Mac OS X. BTW just because I showed compared a high quality pc to a normal iMac doesn't mean Macs suck though that iMac wasn't that great and it cost $600 more. I was just stating that PCs are cheaper not that macs sucks. Macs are great computers but they are overpriced.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 28, 2004, 08:48:56 am
Yes im refering to the mac comp how it sux and the pc is cheaper better
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 28, 2004, 09:17:16 am
sean is right, whn you're not posting this thread isn't as stupid as it usually is. No offense, but still... At least have proof wit your opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 28, 2004, 09:20:27 am
Macs are really too expensive to buy. Otherwise, I might try one out. Our local Best Buy doesn't even have 1 mac in their whole store. I went yesterday and looked around for one.

Windows are just the right price range if you are looking for a computer at all. Mac probably has the better programs but Windows has more of them
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 28, 2004, 09:27:07 am
Best Buy doesn't carry Macs. MacOS has emulators for Windows, and vice versa. So that doesn't matter.

Can we do something other than price for once?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on December 28, 2004, 09:40:07 am
Quote
Yes im refering to the mac comp how it sux and the pc is cheaper better
[snapback]140169[/snapback]

I've officially turned my suggestion into a warning. If you want to put on big boy pants and debate with the other big kids, then act our age.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 28, 2004, 09:43:34 am
Quote
Macs are really too expensive to buy. Otherwise, I might try one out. Our local Best Buy doesn't even have 1 mac in their whole store. I went yesterday and looked around for one.

Windows are just the right price range if you are looking for a computer at all. Mac probably has the better programs but Windows has more of them
[snapback]140171[/snapback]
Windows itself is about $300 though you can get it pre-installed on some computers.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 28, 2004, 09:48:58 am
Quote
Quote
Macs are really too expensive to buy. Otherwise, I might try one out. Our local Best Buy doesn't even have 1 mac in their whole store. I went yesterday and looked around for one.

Windows are just the right price range if you are looking for a computer at all. Mac probably has the better programs but Windows has more of them
[snapback]140171[/snapback]
Windows itself is about $300 though you can get it pre-installed on some computers.
[snapback]140176[/snapback]

I got my comp for $500 and it's been doing ok. I like it pre-installed on computers so it isn't a hastle to deal with.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 28, 2004, 09:50:51 am
How is installing it a hassle to deal with? My Dell uses XP that I re-installed myself, and it's just like before I re-installed it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 28, 2004, 09:52:32 am
Quote
How is installing it a hassle to deal with? My Dell uses XP that I re-installed myself, and it's just like before I re-installed it.
[snapback]140184[/snapback]

Let's just say I have had a hard time before installing XP and it ain't fun :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on December 28, 2004, 09:54:29 am
Wow, that shows you can't even tie your shoes if installing Windows is a hard time.

Crow, I know places to get Home for 100 and Pro for 150, and they're legal. O.o
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 28, 2004, 09:58:07 am
Yesterday, I re-installed XP Home on my computer and it was NOT hard at all. I've installed XP Pro on VMware before and it's just as easy as installing home other than network domain stuff but I did have to install alot of drivers when I re-installed XP Home and that was easy but companies like Compaq and HP should include an xp disk.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 28, 2004, 10:25:00 am
That's nice ya'll are telling me but ya'll arent me. You dont know my mind! My mind is a special place (no replying to that please :P) I'm not a computer geek/nerd like ya'll
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 28, 2004, 10:29:23 am
SSJ, XP is so easy to install a 10 year old who knows nothing about computers can do it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 28, 2004, 10:34:46 am
Quote
SSJ, XP is so easy to install a 10 year old who knows nothing about computers can do it.
[snapback]140201[/snapback]

Maybe I didn't make myself clear...I am not a computer geek, nor will I ever be one. I've had trouble before. I could care less how to install windows xp anymore. I just use a computer to play with it and not to know every freaking detail about the computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on December 28, 2004, 02:14:39 pm
Dude installing xp is a pain especcialy if you have 120gb of hdd space
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on December 28, 2004, 02:15:58 pm
LOL, XP is easy for me and I have a 40GB hdd.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 30, 2004, 08:46:20 am
Sure it's easy to re-format but it's not easy to install for me
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on December 30, 2004, 01:35:24 pm
If you can't install XP... there is something wrong.  Microsoft designed it so that anyone could install it without having to call tech support or even read the manual.  It's self explanatory.

Anyway, yea, I bought XP Home for my dad for around $90.  It's not horribly expensive if you buy the OEM version.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Elizabeth Rose on January 02, 2005, 08:21:58 am
Forgive me if this has been answered but I don't want to sort through 63 pages: Is it true that Macs cannot get viruses and/or spyware?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 02, 2005, 08:28:31 am
No but it's very rare.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 02, 2005, 11:28:49 am
All computers get viruses. If a mac really wants to get a virus...they would go through emails and programs
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 02, 2005, 12:13:29 pm
Mine won't get viruses after I install MDK 64 and never go on Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 02, 2005, 02:08:28 pm
Quote
Mine won't get viruses after I install MDK 64 and never go on Windows.
[snapback]141636[/snapback]

Read above
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 02, 2005, 02:16:33 pm
Your wrong, not all computers get viruses. Mine WON'T if I take Windows off.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: cmonkey on January 02, 2005, 03:20:38 pm
There are viruses, vulnerabilities, and exploits for Windows, Linux, and Mac.  Trust me on this one, there are a lot of hacked linux boxen out there...
Anyway, yea, basically nil chance of getting a virus on Linux compared to Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 02, 2005, 03:40:04 pm
I almost never get a virus on windows now so there would be a -1000 chance of me getting one on linux and a -500 of me getting one on OS X and a 0 chance of me getting one on Windows. I don't download alot on Windows anymore like I used to.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on January 06, 2005, 09:55:45 am
I don't get viruses on Windows. o_O You act like they're so abundant.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on January 06, 2005, 09:57:23 am
That's because you have a hardware firewall, which is hard to get through. Not everyone has that.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 06, 2005, 10:05:43 am
I have that ^__^

I dont use it though <_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: copycat136 on January 08, 2005, 09:53:14 am
I dont know much about Mac.  Ive never use one.  PC is the BEST!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 08, 2005, 01:29:04 pm
Quote
I dont know much about Mac.  Ive never use one.  PC is the BEST!!!
[snapback]142842[/snapback]

What kind of backup is that?

I think in '06 that XP will still overrule Longhorn
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 08, 2005, 01:30:16 pm
Quote
I dont know much about Mac.  Ive never use one.  PC is the BEST!!!
[snapback]142842[/snapback]
You probably don't know much about either.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on January 09, 2005, 07:05:58 pm
Quote
I have that ^__^

I dont use it though <_<

What a waste of money, you buy a computer and just don't use it. :tongue:

Quote
I dont know much about Mac. Ive never use one. PC is the BEST!!!

Nice arguing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on January 12, 2005, 03:03:52 pm
PC fanboys, have just lost one of they're favorite lies Macs are to expensive. For the fact is Apple now has $499 computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 12, 2005, 03:13:04 pm
And yet people will still use their PC XD
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on January 12, 2005, 03:15:07 pm
But a $499 Mac will bring alot of new users. Sure it doesn't have a keyboard and mouse standard, but what do you execpt for the price?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 12, 2005, 03:32:52 pm
I only like PCs more if there running Linux but not  Windows and Macs are faster than most people think.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on January 12, 2005, 03:58:06 pm
You don't know that Timo. Lots of people have ordered them.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 12, 2005, 04:22:25 pm
I might even consider getting a Mini Mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on January 12, 2005, 06:41:00 pm
I'd get 1, would you use the standard MacOS or would you install and use linux? I think MacOS X is free BSD unix.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on January 12, 2005, 07:45:11 pm
Quote
I'd get 1, would you use the standard MacOS or would you install and use linux? I think MacOS X is free BSD unix.
[snapback]143899[/snapback]
I'd dual boot Yellow Dog Linux and Mac OS X just like I dual boot Mandrakelinux 10.1 and Windows XP.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on January 12, 2005, 07:48:53 pm
Quote
I think MacOS X is free BSD unix.
[snapback]143899[/snapback]

Wait... BSD Unix is already free. Mac OS X is sort of free, but not completely.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on January 16, 2005, 08:42:07 am
Hmmm. I've used macs. The only reason I'd rather use PC is because I'm used to it. Thats it, really. I knew someone who does music on a mac. With macs I find that you can tell the computer exactly what to do. Exactly where to put files and data. When I go to college this coming spring I'll get getting a g4 laptop as part of the program. You just have to get used to using mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on January 22, 2005, 07:03:41 am
Quote
Quote
I think MacOS X is free BSD unix.
[snapback]143899[/snapback]

Wait... BSD Unix is already free. Mac OS X is sort of free, but not completely.
[snapback]143910[/snapback]
That's the Unix Mac OS X is based on.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on January 22, 2005, 02:10:02 pm
Are they going to make a Mac OS XI?! If so, when will it be out
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on January 22, 2005, 03:56:27 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
I think MacOS X is free BSD unix.
[snapback]143899[/snapback]

Wait... BSD Unix is already free. Mac OS X is sort of free, but not completely.
[snapback]143910[/snapback]
That's the Unix Mac OS X is based on.
[snapback]146256[/snapback]

I know. It's just that Mac OS isn't as free as BSD.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on February 02, 2005, 05:06:35 pm
Macs can use open sorce software. I have OpenOffice.org, and Gimp on my iBook.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on February 02, 2005, 05:11:38 pm
Quote
Macs can use open sorce software. I have OpenOffice.org, and Gimp on my iBook.
[snapback]149629[/snapback]

Did I ever say they couldn't? No. I have X Server and the GIMP on my Mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on February 02, 2005, 05:26:46 pm
Do you know how to get Fink to work? I have downloaded it, and checked the pathway, in the termnial about a millon times.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on March 19, 2005, 01:16:24 am
Mac is a lot more secure than PC bcause of the PC's poularity but PC is a lot better I think because there are so many los of privilages downloads on MAC and you can download everything on PC
I rest my case
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on March 20, 2005, 03:40:29 pm
Hey if you want better security on pc, dont use windows
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 20, 2005, 03:42:14 pm
Yeah use Mandrake if you want something and secure.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on March 20, 2005, 05:17:41 pm
Quote
Hey if you want better security on pc, dont use windows
[snapback]161826[/snapback]

You do realize you can download security programs that take up no room at all
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 20, 2005, 06:26:01 pm
Better yet use Ubuntu 5.04 Hoary with the GNOME desktop.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on March 22, 2005, 05:20:24 pm
Have any of you guys ever used Mac Powerbooks? The laptops? I'm not too sure if they come in any other form. Are they pretty good? I'm supposed to get one when I got to college.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on March 22, 2005, 05:25:24 pm
Yes. Powerful, light, although mildly overpriced.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on March 22, 2005, 08:59:05 pm
My sister has used one for at least a year and a half. She loves it. She has some problems with kernal patches(I have no idea what that is), but overall she likes it really well.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 22, 2005, 09:00:16 pm
Quote
My sister has used one for at least a year and a half. She loves it. She has some problems with kernal patches(I have no idea what that is), but overall she likes it really well.
[snapback]162729[/snapback]
It's kernel not kernal.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on March 23, 2005, 04:28:34 pm
What is a kernel patch?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 23, 2005, 05:34:13 pm
The Kernel is like the heart of the OS and a kernel patch just adds stuff to the kernel. Anyways WinXP Pro 64 has the same kernel as Windows 2003.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on March 23, 2005, 09:18:27 pm
Quote
It's kernel not kernal.

Sorry. My mistake. :P

Quote
The Kernel is like the heart of the OS and a kernel patch just adds stuff to the kernel. Anyways WinXP Pro 64 has the same kernel as Windows 2003.
[snapback]162979[/snapback]


I may have the name mistaken then. She talked about it as if it was a bad thing.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 23, 2005, 09:33:05 pm
You mean kernel panics? I've had them in Linux before.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SizzlinSean on March 24, 2005, 01:21:54 pm
Quote
You mean kernel panics? I've had them in Linux before.
[snapback]163093[/snapback]

Yeah. That sounds more like it. :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 24, 2005, 01:51:57 pm
Kernel panics are horrible, I had one in Mandrake once and had them alot in MEPIS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 24, 2005, 04:15:10 pm
Quote
Kernel panics are horrible, I had one in Mandrake once and had them alot in MEPIS.
[snapback]163202[/snapback]
Kernel panics in OS X just make, need to have the Mac Restarted most of the time.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 25, 2005, 10:33:59 am
In linux, it's basicly a death for the OS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Chrono on March 26, 2005, 03:30:28 pm
Macs need to get up with the times on their Msn. Windows is in 7, Mac is in 4 (or 5).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on March 26, 2005, 03:34:59 pm
Quote
Macs need to get up with the times on their Msn. Windows is in 7, Mac is in 4 (or 5).
[snapback]164082[/snapback]
Blame that on Microsoft not Apple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on March 28, 2005, 09:09:28 am
Quote
Macs need to get up with the times on their Msn. Windows is in 7, Mac is in 4 (or 5).
[snapback]164082[/snapback]

You can always use Adium.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on March 28, 2005, 10:42:17 am
Msn is just poorly made. It's pathetic
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on March 28, 2005, 10:52:58 am
Quote
Quote
Macs need to get up with the times on their Msn. Windows is in 7, Mac is in 4 (or 5).
[snapback]164082[/snapback]

You can always use Adium.
[snapback]164720[/snapback]
Adium is great, you can use all your AIM, yahoo, MSN, and just about anything other IM service you use.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on April 03, 2005, 01:02:32 pm
Yeah it is good, I've used it but I still reckon PC is better, you can download so much more stuff. I.E How many times have you seen "Windows Only" in front of anything?....exactly.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on April 03, 2005, 05:04:42 pm
Most of the stuff I use is for all 3.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on April 03, 2005, 06:15:22 pm
I tried Adium today.  It's pretty good.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on April 16, 2005, 04:46:58 pm
I have a normal windows computer but don't know what I'll use when I get my laptop, any ideas?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 16, 2005, 04:51:57 pm
Quote
I have a normal windows computer but don't know what I'll use when I get my laptop, any ideas?
[snapback]170560[/snapback]
Get an iBook, it may be a Mac, but Apple makes the highest quality laptops.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on April 16, 2005, 05:03:51 pm
Yeah either an Apple or Alienware will do for laptops.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on April 16, 2005, 09:39:01 pm
Quote
Yeah either an Apple or Alienware will do for laptops.
[snapback]170570[/snapback]

Alienware is horribly overpriced trash.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on April 16, 2005, 09:40:15 pm
Quote
Quote
Yeah either an Apple or Alienware will do for laptops.
[snapback]170570[/snapback]

Alienware is horribly overpriced trash.
[snapback]170660[/snapback]
Preach it my brotha. :D

Alienware is full of crap, too. I've played on one before and its a total waste of used space on this earth.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 17, 2005, 11:27:36 am
Quote
Quote
Quote
Yeah either an Apple or Alienware will do for laptops.
[snapback]170570[/snapback]

Alienware is horribly overpriced trash.
[snapback]170660[/snapback]
Preach it my brotha. :D

Alienware is full of crap, too. I've played on one before and its a total waste of used space on this earth.
[snapback]170661[/snapback]
Alienware is way overpriced even with these $700 rebates, I'd never buy one.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: williambob286 on April 20, 2005, 08:46:51 pm
I like both even if I us Mac super duper rarely
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Chrono on April 29, 2005, 07:20:36 pm
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on April 30, 2005, 11:02:45 am
Quote
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
[snapback]174604[/snapback]
Yup, I agree.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 30, 2005, 02:57:02 pm
Quote
Quote
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
[snapback]174604[/snapback]
Yup, I agree.
[snapback]174723[/snapback]
I also agree, it's also easier to find the screenname you want with MSN, because you can use your email address.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on April 30, 2005, 08:49:15 pm
Quote
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
[snapback]174604[/snapback]

There are lots of good ideas in MSN Messenger, the problem is that the client is as safe as a minefield.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on April 30, 2005, 08:57:36 pm
Quote
Quote
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
[snapback]174604[/snapback]

There are lots of good ideas in MSN Messenger, the problem is that the client is as safe as a minefield.
[snapback]174930[/snapback]
I agree which is why I use Gaim for MSN.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 30, 2005, 08:58:53 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
I don't see why MSN is so hated. MSN isn't poorly made at all.
[snapback]174604[/snapback]

There are lots of good ideas in MSN Messenger, the problem is that the client is as safe as a minefield.
[snapback]174930[/snapback]
I agree which is why I use Gaim for MSN.
[snapback]174932[/snapback]
That's why I use Adium for everything.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on May 01, 2005, 05:51:01 pm
I use Gaim for everything but Skype.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: patricksquarepants on May 09, 2005, 12:08:15 pm
I personally always thought that macs were not as good as pc but now macs are starting to get better
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Chrono on May 15, 2005, 04:48:54 pm
Dumb time! What exactly is an Msn Client?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 28, 2005, 06:06:39 pm
Quote
Dumb time! What exactly is an Msn Client?
[snapback]179148[/snapback]
It's what program you use to use MSN.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on May 28, 2005, 08:35:04 pm
My doubts about getting an apple laptop are there are so many downloads that I can only get on Windows....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on May 29, 2005, 06:54:46 pm
Quote
My doubts about getting an apple laptop are there are so many downloads that I can only get on Windows....
[snapback]183726[/snapback]
What all do you use?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on May 30, 2005, 09:59:42 pm
Quote
Quote
My doubts about getting an apple laptop are there are so many downloads that I can only get on Windows....
[snapback]183726[/snapback]
What all do you use?
[snapback]184122[/snapback]
So sorry, but what's an all?
sorry  :closedeyes:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on May 30, 2005, 10:32:53 pm
What programs do you use on windows that you cant get on apple?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on May 31, 2005, 12:08:56 am
Quote
What programs do you use on windows that you cant get on apple?
[snapback]184638[/snapback]
Well...um...




I don't know, windows just seems....better  :wacko:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on May 31, 2005, 07:30:14 am
Windows is full of crap like the bsod and viruses and spyware.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on May 31, 2005, 07:35:01 am
Hey! like i said if you dont want viruses and spyware don't use windows :-D!!!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Sheldon J. Plankton on May 31, 2005, 07:37:24 am
Mac Vs. PC, hm, I own a PC, but I personally think Mac (which my grandparents have) is a little faster, PC has better programs I must say though.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on May 31, 2005, 08:02:15 am
There's a few programs on windows I can't go without.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Banana on May 31, 2005, 01:48:26 pm
Have I posted in this thread before?  I have no idea.

Windows has a whole lot of nifty little features, sure, but...when it all comes down to it, Mac is the better system.  You can do so much more with it, it's much more convenient, and even though it doesn't have as many, it has better games.  Plus, Mac has better protection than Windows, which is always good.

But I don't HATE Windows.  It's OK.  Just not my preferance.  And I honestly have never used a Linux so I can't say anything about it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on June 01, 2005, 01:57:00 am
Quote
There's a few programs on windows I can't go without.
[snapback]184715[/snapback]
Like what?
Just curious  :happy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on June 01, 2005, 07:49:31 am
Nero
VirtualDub

Those are pretty much the only ones.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: partiallynothing on June 01, 2005, 10:27:49 am
I have always been a huge fan of Photoshop and Premiere. I cannot go without those.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on June 01, 2005, 10:31:35 am
Quote
I have always been a huge fan of Photoshop and Premiere. I cannot go without those.
[snapback]185309[/snapback]
Oh yeah those two.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on June 03, 2005, 01:19:39 pm
What....you mean I can't have photoshop on a mac......
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on June 04, 2005, 10:19:02 am
Quote
What....you mean I can't have photoshop on a mac......
[snapback]186390[/snapback]
No you can have photoshop on a Mac, all Adobe software is made for Macs. Mac's still rule the graphics industry so they have to make Photoshop.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on June 04, 2005, 01:45:40 pm
Quote
Quote
What....you mean I can't have photoshop on a mac......
[snapback]186390[/snapback]
No you can have photoshop on a Mac, all Adobe software is made for Macs. Mac's still rule the graphics industry so they have to make Photoshop.
[snapback]186938[/snapback]
Mac's rule the graphics industry.....






















I'm getting a mac.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on June 16, 2005, 04:19:42 pm
What kind of mac are you getting?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 18, 2005, 08:08:11 pm
My moms friend got a mac. its a G3 O.O.  He said he was getting tired of viruses and spyware. I said "Hey if you dont want viruses dont use windows" he says "yeah exactly"
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on June 19, 2005, 11:23:46 am
Quote
My moms friend got a mac. its a G3 O.O.  He said he was getting tired of viruses and spyware. I said "Hey if you dont want viruses dont use windows" he says "yeah exactly"
[snapback]193943[/snapback]

...No. Just no. What Mac OS does it have?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 19, 2005, 11:24:26 am
Quote
My moms friend got a mac. its a G3 O.O.  He said he was getting tired of viruses and spyware. I said "Hey if you dont want viruses dont use windows" he says "yeah exactly"
[snapback]193943[/snapback]

or you could just common sense while using Windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 19, 2005, 02:42:08 pm
Common sense??? How can a person who is a complete n00b with todays computers use common sense with windows??? My moms friend has only used computers with windows back in the early 90's when there wernt viruses and spyware on windows.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 19, 2005, 04:19:38 pm
Don't download things you aren't sure about; don't open attachments from people you don't know; run SpyBot and Ad-Aware regularly; and use FireFox.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 19, 2005, 05:13:27 pm
:huh: How Is a comp n00b going to know about those programs. What if the email attatchment(sp?) Is from a person you know but it is acctually a virus disquised with their friends email address?

And about Ad-Aware, my Dad says the program is being exploited. But their must be a new fixed version version out.  :happy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 19, 2005, 05:15:35 pm
Then they should learn about the computer before using it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 19, 2005, 05:24:06 pm
Yeah they need to know that we shouldn't use or install an insecure operating system like windows :happy:

But with me im forced to use this P.o.s. becuase programs i like and use only run under windows :angry:  
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 19, 2005, 05:25:15 pm
Quote
Yeah they need to know that we shouldn't use or install an insecure operating system like windows :happy:
[snapback]194247[/snapback]

Windows is insecure, which you can see by my 0 spyware and 0 viruses.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on June 19, 2005, 05:31:58 pm
Yeah but notice! You have to download anti-virus and anti-spyware programs that microsoft hasnt made, and even if it is made by microsoft it sucks!
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on June 19, 2005, 05:34:47 pm
Yes, it is riskier to use, but the benefits outweigh the hassle.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 05, 2005, 07:54:35 pm
Yeah but windows sucks and thats all you need to know about it

 :happy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 05, 2005, 07:57:28 pm
Then don't use it. It's that simple.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on July 05, 2005, 08:01:36 pm
It all depends on what you need to use. If you need to do graphic arts, or a video work than you're better off with a Mac. But if you want a comptuer for accounting or gaming you are better off with a PC. If you want a webserver use Linux. For basic email and word processing (which is what 90% of computer users want) get whatever you want.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 05, 2005, 09:09:59 pm
Then stop talking bad about windows if you still have to use it :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on July 05, 2005, 09:29:05 pm
Quote
It all depends on what you need to use. If you need to do graphic arts, or a video work than you're better off with a Mac. But if you want a comptuer for accounting or gaming you are better off with a PC. If you want a webserver use Linux. For basic email and word processing (which is what 90% of computer users want) get whatever you want.
[snapback]202130[/snapback]
Yeah, I don't have a mac anymore but I aggree with what you're saying about graphics and videos... hmm... I'm considering an iBook.

And Korrax, do you use a mac or linux?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 05, 2005, 09:47:05 pm
Quote
Then don't use it. It's that simple.
[snapback]202127[/snapback]
My Moms friend is already doing that  :happy:

SSJ I totaly agree but it is becuase Kevin is objecting to my Moms friend using a Mac.

Timstapels I luv them all I use them all  :wub:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: timstapels on July 05, 2005, 10:15:24 pm
Quote
Timstapels I luv them all I use them all  :wub:
[snapback]202170[/snapback]
Ok... thanks...  :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 07, 2005, 11:44:27 am
Quote
Quote
Then don't use it. It's that simple.
[snapback]202127[/snapback]
My Moms friend is already doing that  :happy:

SSJ I totaly agree but it is becuase Kevin is objecting to my Moms friend using a Mac.

Timstapels I luv them all I use them all  :wub:
[snapback]202170[/snapback]

No, if she wants to use a Mac, by all means she can. I'm disagreeing with you making up all this crap about Windows crashing eleventy-billion times and that it's not good.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 07, 2005, 01:08:25 pm
No, im saying it is inseccure. Windows like only crashes every once in a while. :happy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on July 07, 2005, 01:14:58 pm
Quote
No, im saying it is inseccure. Windows like only crashes every once in a while. :happy:
[snapback]203136[/snapback]

I've been using this PC for over a year, and I've never had it crash.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 09, 2005, 10:01:58 pm
Wow. Well when I had my pc2700 ram it crashed often but now with my pc3200 ram it rarley crashes : happy :
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 19, 2005, 09:19:44 pm
Seeing as a flame war is beginning in another topic, I decided to post my thoughts again here.

Windows does not suck if you really know how to use the OS. If it crashes on you, you really are that stupid with computers.
If you get spyware in windows, you are going to the wrong sites you moron.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 19, 2005, 09:37:35 pm
It only crashed when I had hardware problems :happy:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 19, 2005, 09:46:24 pm
Then windows doesnt suck O_o
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 19, 2005, 09:53:13 pm
No windows sucks I hate it!. But I use it becuase of all the super cool programs!!! And tweakers I can get for it :-D

Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rabble on July 19, 2005, 09:56:15 pm
You never learn do you?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on July 19, 2005, 09:56:42 pm
Then it shouldnt suck if you can get your programs that you want, eh?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 19, 2005, 10:02:00 pm
Im too tired to explain my opinion ill edit tommorrow
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: weird_4 on August 09, 2005, 09:23:00 pm
I dunno which is better.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on August 10, 2005, 07:20:17 pm
Quote
Seeing as a flame war is beginning in another topic, I decided to post my thoughts again here.

Windows does not suck if you really know how to use the OS. If it crashes on you, you really are that stupid with computers.
If you get spyware in windows, you are going to the wrong sites you moron.
[snapback]207356[/snapback]

Funny...I had to re-boot windows barley out of the box. I still had shrink wrap on some of the devices. With My Mac I booted it up and it was ready to go no error messages. Plus, Macs arent idiot proff. No computer is, really. I dont have to have 6 different spyware programs on my mac. No virus protection. Why? Because I stay away from limewire and the like and there arent as nearly as many virsus written for mac then there are for pc....
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 10, 2005, 07:37:49 pm
Quote
Quote
Seeing as a flame war is beginning in another topic, I decided to post my thoughts again here.

Windows does not suck if you really know how to use the OS. If it crashes on you, you really are that stupid with computers.
If you get spyware in windows, you are going to the wrong sites you moron.
[snapback]207356[/snapback]

Funny...I had to re-boot windows barley out of the box. I still had shrink wrap on some of the devices. With My Mac I booted it up and it was ready to go no error messages. Plus, Macs arent idiot proff. No computer is, really. I dont have to have 6 different spyware programs on my mac. No virus protection. Why? Because I stay away from limewire and the like and there arent as nearly as many virsus written for mac then there are for pc....
[snapback]216713[/snapback]
Was it a used windows out of the box or brand new?
You dont need 6 spyware programs. Only 1 or 2.
Avast Antivirus is the only virus program you need ^_^
Limewire hasnt given me viruses since I've used it for the first time like a year ago.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on August 10, 2005, 08:39:33 pm
Out of the box BRAND NEW. And I've downloaded quite a bit of spyware protection. Mac doesnt need any. Nor does it need any anti virus programs. It was a job keeping my pc in tip-top shape. This is a lot easier. With a dock, I dont have icons clogging up my desktop, either. It's rather nice. It has its drawbacks. After you close a program you have to quit by hitting Apple->Q or go up to the menu and hit quit in the program drop box to get it to fully quit. On the upside, if I accidentally close the box the program is still open. If I hit "F11" it'll move the current window I'm working on over to the side so I can access my desktop. It's a rather nice machine...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on August 10, 2005, 09:57:49 pm
Quote
Out of the box BRAND NEW. And I've downloaded quite a bit of spyware protection. Mac doesnt need any. Nor does it need any anti virus programs. It was a job keeping my pc in tip-top shape. This is a lot easier. With a dock, I dont have icons clogging up my desktop, either. It's rather nice. It has its drawbacks. After you close a program you have to quit by hitting Apple->Q or go up to the menu and hit quit in the program drop box to get it to fully quit. On the upside, if I accidentally close the box the program is still open. If I hit "F11" it'll move the current window I'm working on over to the side so I can access my desktop. It's a rather nice machine...
[snapback]216760[/snapback]
Glad to read you enjoy your Mac. I like it too, the bottem screen is nice, it stores all the programs I use and yet it doesn't clog up my desktop with icons like windows would. I use Limewire and I have no problems with spyware and virus's.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 10, 2005, 10:48:30 pm
Quote
Because I stay away from limewire and the like and there arent as nearly as many virsus written for mac then there are for pc....


Quote
And I've downloaded quite a bit of spyware protection. Mac doesnt need any. Nor does it need any anti virus programs.
[snapback]216760[/snapback]
Hmmm...I see differences between these 2 quotes. Can you find them?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on August 11, 2005, 07:40:27 am
Yes, there is a huge difference.

I dont have limewire on my MAC. I had it on my PC. Amd you could go to any site and get spyware, not jusr P2P programs.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 11, 2005, 11:46:52 am
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on August 11, 2005, 12:39:38 pm
I have actually looked  more into macs. OS10 is really cool(beats the crappy OS1.2 my school uses). I just dont like its lack of customizabilty(sp?/is it even a word?). With Windows you can custmomize to your dreams fullest extent almost. If the Apple computer ever becomes more customizable then I will like it a lot more than I do now.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on August 11, 2005, 03:46:05 pm
Quote
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
[snapback]216873[/snapback]
Because Mac's don't really have that many virues writen for them. There is only about 50 virius's for Macs and the last one was mad in 2000 before OS X.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on August 11, 2005, 04:03:38 pm
Quote
Quote
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
[snapback]216873[/snapback]
Because Mac's don't really have that many virues writen for them. There is only about 50 virius's for Macs and the last one was mad in 2000 before OS X.
[snapback]216971[/snapback]

Oops, forgot to point that out.  :laugh:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 11, 2005, 05:05:54 pm
Quote
Quote
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
[snapback]216873[/snapback]
Because Mac's don't really have that many virues writen for them. There is only about 50 virius's for Macs and the last one was mad in 2000 before OS X.
[snapback]216971[/snapback]
She said that you dont need a virus program so that basically means you'll be keeping the virus on the Mac a long time.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on August 11, 2005, 05:55:00 pm
Even if there arent many virsuses you still need a virus program.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey34 on August 11, 2005, 05:55:24 pm
could it be another victim? welcome to the club, now we need a sign that says no ssjs allwoed, because one day he'll want to join. :tongue:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on August 12, 2005, 09:29:33 am
Quote
Quote
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
[snapback]216873[/snapback]
Because Mac's don't really have that many virues writen for them. There is only about 50 virius's for Macs and the last one was mad in 2000 before OS X.
[snapback]216971[/snapback]

because Macs aren't nearly as popular as Windows (although I will admit Windows is coded worse).
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on August 15, 2005, 02:42:05 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
The first quote you said that macs hardly get viruses but then the second quote you said you dont need a virus program for macs. How can that be? :O
[snapback]216873[/snapback]
Because Mac's don't really have that many virues writen for them. There is only about 50 virius's for Macs and the last one was mad in 2000 before OS X.
[snapback]216971[/snapback]

because Macs aren't nearly as popular as Windows (although I will admit Windows is coded worse).
[snapback]217331[/snapback]
A Ha you admit Windows isn't perfect! And what do you expect Microsoft tries to get products out as soon as possialbe even if that means releasing a buggy OS. Although I admit the Mac OS 10.0 wasn't that stable, and was picky. But it was a whole new OS.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on August 15, 2005, 04:23:52 pm
Is Tiger unstable? Or was this another version of OSX?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on August 15, 2005, 04:56:54 pm
Quote
Is Tiger unstable? Or was this another version of OSX?
[snapback]219266[/snapback]
Another verson of OS X. Tiger is the most recent verson I'm talking about OS 10.0, Tiger is OS 10.4, yearly OS X updates are done by 10.x.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 15, 2005, 07:00:26 pm
http://www.microsoft.com/winme/0507/25234/Win_Name_MBR.asx (http://www.microsoft.com/winme/0507/25234/Win_Name_MBR.asx)

Windows Vista <_<
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongegor on August 20, 2005, 09:50:18 am
What is that link??
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 21, 2005, 02:05:06 pm
Quote
http://www.microsoft.com/winme/0507/25234/Win_Name_MBR.asx (http://www.microsoft.com/winme/0507/25234/Win_Name_MBR.asx)

Windows Vista <_<
[snapback]219323[/snapback]


Quote
What is that link??
[snapback]221294[/snapback]
Take a wild stab at it.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: sgtsponge on August 29, 2005, 05:45:30 pm
i like pc way BETTER :biggrin:  :biggrin:  :biggrin:
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Sb129 on September 03, 2005, 07:40:21 am
Seeing as thoe this topic is so long I don't know if I've posted here before but Mac pwns PC.I'm using my mom's mac laptop right this very moment.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on September 17, 2005, 11:16:28 am
My dad is getting a mac on monday for music recording.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongey4 on September 17, 2005, 03:41:35 pm
Pc
Its better
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 17, 2005, 03:42:13 pm
Quote
Pc
Its better
[snapback]233665[/snapback]
I like the way you think :P
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on September 23, 2005, 06:35:33 pm
Quote
My dad is getting a mac on monday for music recording.
[snapback]233482[/snapback]

Which programs is he going to run?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Stephen on October 25, 2005, 03:52:48 pm
MACS ARE BEST... because they have unlimited capabilitys... tons of built in programming languages. Security is at it's max with built in firewalls and popup blockers built into the firmware.

I know, it's just me being my normal geeky self :-P

I like being a geek
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: williambob286 on October 26, 2005, 06:24:10 am
I prefer macs. I rarely use them now lolz

I used to use a mac in my old school at a young age, and here in a mall, they have some game (in BK) in mac, except it's like busted now
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Chrono on October 27, 2005, 06:52:39 pm
I would buy a mac, but it would probably be a bit confusing for me.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on November 07, 2005, 06:12:24 pm
I had the wroing impression on macs at first cuz our schools were still on an IMac running an OS 1.2 O.o


MacOSX Tiger is nice. I really like those babies.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Isnt Anything on November 13, 2005, 03:23:14 pm
Macs are nice and they are only confusing because they work differently than a PC. And PC owns a good 90% of the computer market.

Macs seem to rely more on the quick keys than PC's do. I mean, there are quick keys for PC's, but they seem to be used more for macs. Oh, and for those who hate macs just because of the right-click issue. There are mouses made with a right click and if you dont have a right click on your mouse or laptop just do Control->Click.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: bub1028 on December 17, 2005, 10:24:03 am
pc.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: abney317 on December 21, 2005, 05:59:26 pm
PC is much better

Mac is weird  

Mac doesn't work very well
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on January 08, 2006, 07:23:48 pm
Quote
PC is much better

Mac is weird   

Mac doesn't work very well
[snapback]262601[/snapback]
Could you define "werid" and how it doesn't work well.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on January 12, 2006, 04:58:23 pm
Quote
PC is much better

Mac is weird   

Mac doesn't work very well
[snapback]262601[/snapback]
...

Dude....

The mac has been owning the PC for a long time.

Back in 1991 you could do so much cool stuff on a mac that the pc wasnt even cabable of even doing...
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: spongey snail on February 07, 2006, 08:03:23 pm
I have been used to pc my whole life but I am very interested in owneing an I mac g5.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on February 08, 2006, 01:55:22 pm
Quote
The mac has been owning the PC for a long time.
[snapback]264950[/snapback]
Opinion...not fact.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on February 08, 2006, 03:21:50 pm
Quote
Quote
The mac has been owning the PC for a long time.
[snapback]264950[/snapback]
Opinion...not fact.
[snapback]270583[/snapback]
Yes fact, if you read/understood the rest of his post.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on February 08, 2006, 03:48:17 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
The mac has been owning the PC for a long time.
[snapback]264950[/snapback]
Opinion...not fact.
[snapback]270583[/snapback]
Yes fact, if you read/understood the rest of his post.
[snapback]270613[/snapback]
Like I said before...opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: VulturEMaN on February 08, 2006, 03:51:16 pm
Having to buy a product from a company that doesn't allow for competition with their software doesn't sound like owning to me....it sounds stupid. I'd rather own a crappy windows system that I could build and mess around with than having to worry about buying upgrades from the 'Big Apple'.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on February 08, 2006, 06:07:20 pm
Quote
Quote
PC is much better

Mac is weird   

Mac doesn't work very well
[snapback]262601[/snapback]
Back in 1991 you could do so much cool stuff on a mac that the pc wasnt even cabable of even doing...
[snapback]264950[/snapback]
Someone living in the past, eh?
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: carterhawk on February 25, 2006, 10:46:38 am
Fact is that the line between PC and Mac is becoming extremely blurred. At this point the only difference is mac's use EFI instead of BIOS and run MacOS. once people can boot XP on a mac without bricking it, the line will officialy cease to exist.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: bub1028 on February 25, 2006, 12:35:28 pm
actually, i wanna mac now.  i just want to try one out.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on February 25, 2006, 01:03:12 pm
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
The mac has been owning the PC for a long time.
[snapback]264950[/snapback]
Opinion...not fact.
[snapback]270583[/snapback]
Yes fact, if you read/understood the rest of his post.
[snapback]270613[/snapback]
Like I said before...opinion.
[snapback]270620[/snapback]
I'm not gonna say anything, considering you'll just call me a moron...

Quote
Someone living in the past, eh?

Not, really.  Today, both are about the same it's just that Macs today are for people who don't understand computers, are impatient with computers, don't like crashes such as explorer in Windows XP, and thats about it.



Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: carterhawk on February 27, 2006, 04:38:52 pm
Until i see Aero, the MacOS interface and engine pwn the old school windows shell by and far, and have for years. However, in the modern era macs are slower, have less support, and cost more. Im hoping Aero will absolutely pwn the screen the way MacOS does.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Snowthrower on March 02, 2006, 05:53:07 pm
Aero already looks ugly, not mention Vista is a HUGE disappointment to me, since I love XP. Unless Mac messes up, I will definitely be purchasing a Mac as my new computer.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: carterhawk on March 04, 2006, 05:28:50 pm
Just out of curiosity, but, are you in the microsoft beta program? if your not you should reserve judgement.

You have to remember that XP is an extention of the old NT kernel. Vista is built with a brand new kernel that will seriously reduce the exploits found in the XP kernel.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Barnacle Head on March 11, 2006, 05:34:40 am
At my work we have a Mac lab attached to a Server 2003 Active Directory enviornment and needless to say they don't play nice.  The students use Quark for art projects and thats about it.  Otherwise it's a big waste of money.  Just my opinion.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: carterhawk on March 13, 2006, 08:33:32 pm
as an abstract thought, why not isolate the macs from the rest of the network? at my HS the windows labs and hte mac labs had seperate user lists.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on April 21, 2006, 06:53:09 pm
Quote
Just out of curiosity, but, are you in the microsoft beta program? if your not you should reserve judgement.

You have to remember that XP is an extention of the old NT kernel. Vista is built with a brand new kernel that will seriously reduce the exploits found in the XP kernel.
[snapback]275902[/snapback]
Until MS, builds Windows with a Unix Kernal at it's core, it's still going to have many exploits. Remember Bill Gates challeneged hackers to hack into 2000 and they did, in under a day.
Title: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: aduckie on May 03, 2006, 09:02:49 pm
PC! Linux! GRUB! WINE!

Those are the words, or acronyms, that pop up when I read the title of this thread.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Ealcon on September 28, 2006, 10:47:15 am
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on September 28, 2006, 12:18:30 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 29, 2006, 06:51:38 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IceFox on September 29, 2006, 08:12:08 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: bub1028 on October 01, 2006, 09:27:13 am
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
LOL, that's called a logo.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: VulturEMaN on October 01, 2006, 09:59:00 am
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.

At our middle school, we had Windows NT in 8th grade. In 9th grade, at the high school, we had the latest mac OS and windows XP :D
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on October 01, 2006, 07:27:10 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.

At our middle school, we had Windows NT in 8th grade. In 9th grade, at the high school, we had the latest mac OS and windows XP :D
I can top that, at my middle school, we still had computers with Windows 95! This was in 2002-2004.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on March 10, 2007, 11:17:54 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.

At our middle school, we had Windows NT in 8th grade. In 9th grade, at the high school, we had the latest mac OS and windows XP :D
I can top that, at my middle school, we still had computers with Windows 95! This was in 2002-2004.
Windows 95 ftmfw!!

Microsoft Bob > you

btw, BUMP!
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: AppleNick on March 15, 2007, 10:35:00 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.

At our middle school, we had Windows NT in 8th grade. In 9th grade, at the high school, we had the latest mac OS and windows XP :D
I can top that, at my middle school, we still had computers with Windows 95! This was in 2002-2004.
Windows 95 ftmfw!!

Microsoft Bob > you

btw, BUMP!

It was pinned anyway. Didn't this die when Apple switched to Intel?
Title: My updated opinion on this whole Mac vs. Pc debate
Post by: Compwhiz128 on April 24, 2007, 08:00:23 pm
Heres my opinion I was ranting about on "You Tube"

All I have to say is, a Mac is an overpriced piece of hardware as far as I'm concerned.  Back when I built my machine in 2003 it didn't cost over $1000 and it owned all of the macs I saw on apples webpage, and yet windows only crashed from APPLE! products.  With the exception of better,cheaper hardware, I can still run Mac OS on my computer and not pay over $1000 for hardware...

Whats extremely odd, I thought my machine would be easily owned by a mac. I visited apples webpage and my machine still owns the Macs I saw on their webpage...Interesting... 
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Patron3000 on June 03, 2007, 02:50:41 pm
I find Macs overrated. I'm too used to PCs.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 16, 2007, 02:54:30 pm
I don't like Macs at all, and when we were at primary school, they were the ones we had to use.Our teachers kept saying:"Now, if you've listened properly, there will be no error signs or any problems.But even me, a BoffGoth, kept getting all the errors that you expect of a Mac.All the kids started laughing when the error sign came up, and a funny robot woman's voice went:"Droo srhoo, shrrooo droo droo srhddooo drshshooo."
And Macs have that annoying apple thing everywhere.
Primary schools always use seriosly outdated mac operating systems. Use an OSX and then see.
werd

My moms elementary school still uses Like OS6 or something...something before 2000. =\
Yeah the elementary school I went to used OS 5.9 or some crap like that, and teachers/staff were all on Windows 98.

At our middle school, we had Windows NT in 8th grade. In 9th grade, at the high school, we had the latest mac OS and windows XP :D
I can top that, at my middle school, we still had computers with Windows 95! This was in 2002-2004.
Windows 95 ftmfw!!

Microsoft Bob > you

btw, BUMP!

It was pinned anyway. Didn't this die when Apple switched to Intel?

It did die off since with out a doubt Mac now preforms better than a WinPc plus tools to run windows apps.  Im glad they made the switch.  Since the Power processors were crap, cost a lot more and diddnt perform as good.

Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SBSP9134 on July 21, 2007, 08:07:30 am
Everything Apple made sucks except iPod.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Sb129 on July 21, 2007, 12:18:41 pm
Windows just copies Mac.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SBSP9134 on July 21, 2007, 03:56:38 pm
No.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SpongeBrain on August 19, 2007, 04:30:23 pm
What a convincing argument, sbsp. I am persuaded by your vast knowledge of the subject that you have presented for us.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: IZ on October 24, 2007, 07:34:48 am
I'm posting from the iBook I got. My older brother upgraded to a MacBook, so he gave me his iBook G3. Now all I need is OS X 10.4 :P
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: VulturEMaN on October 24, 2007, 11:17:16 am
can you try and install Freespace Open?

Talk to me on aim sometime...I wanna hear how good it runs under OSX
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SpongebobSquarepants- on December 21, 2007, 10:41:09 am
i think, mac i dunno why i say that though. :ph34r:
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SpongebobSquarepants- on December 21, 2007, 10:42:10 am
because, everyone has PC's and they always crash. and i also have one so it crashes alot.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on December 21, 2007, 11:10:09 am
Your PC must suck. Or it's a user error.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: SpongebobSquarepants- on December 21, 2007, 11:12:41 am
yeah, it most prob does!, maybe i should get someone to fix it or get a new one?
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: John13 on December 28, 2007, 05:38:00 pm
Actually Macs had more errors than PCs. Look here: http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=758
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ~NeonFire372~ on January 02, 2008, 07:33:11 am
I've used Windows for the past 10 years with minor problems here and there. I've never used a Mac and have no intentions of doing so.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rated-R on May 18, 2008, 03:41:45 pm
Windows sucks, but PC wins.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: mario3648 on May 23, 2008, 01:06:15 pm
PC is REALLY better.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Sponge-Bart on May 23, 2008, 02:47:32 pm
In some aspects, Mac is better, and in some, PC is.

Im gonna go with PC here tho.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Sb129 on June 23, 2008, 11:35:31 am
We need a pic of a Mac logo t-bagging a PC.  :wacko:
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on July 21, 2008, 01:15:22 am
I got MacOS X 10.5.4 running exactly like an Intel Mac on my neighbor's Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rubymaster23 on August 15, 2008, 10:48:52 am
I'd pick Mac anyday.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Goofy_Goober_Girl on August 17, 2008, 08:13:00 pm
I have Windows Vista. it sucks cuz it has tons of glitches they didn't work out before putting it on the market, and tons of people are switching back to Windows XP. Mine had a huge internet problem and i just got it to work again...
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: lilums on August 18, 2008, 08:32:44 am
PC is not personal computer its portable computer nuh
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on September 03, 2008, 09:48:08 pm
I'm posting from the iBook I got. My older brother upgraded to a MacBook, so he gave me his iBook G3. Now all I need is OS X 10.4 :P
What happened to you saying you'd never have a mac?
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on September 04, 2008, 08:55:22 pm
I have Windows Vista. it sucks cuz it has tons of glitches they didn't work out before putting it on the market, and tons of people are switching back to Windows XP. Mine had a huge internet problem and i just got it to work again...
USER ERROR
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: aara34 on September 05, 2008, 06:12:44 pm
I barely use a mac and in my opinion I don't think I'm missing much.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on September 05, 2008, 09:39:20 pm
Honestly, I don't see much use for MacOS X. MacOS X is supposedly better for multimedia and Windows is supposedly better for gaming. You can't do hard-core gaming in MacOS X but you can do hard-core video editing and graphics in Windows Vista just as good as you can with MacOS X using Adobe CS3. Also, Encoding any tv or dvd rips is a lot better on Windows Vista than MacOS X or Linux. In reality, you can do just about anything on Windows Vista except for a decent server which is where Linux comes in with MythTv, NAS, and a bunch of other neat server stuff.

PS: MacOS X has issues too, the fact that my laptop won't take MacOS X Leopard and it meets the minimum requirements for it. Apple hardware is pure garbage and I got MacOS X on an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 for around 600 bucks and it outperforms the most expensive iMac.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: explodingwumpa on September 22, 2008, 09:01:40 am
"This could not be opened because of error 4120. Description: You have no idea what you are doing"

MACS R PUTRID!!
PCS ARE :ph34r:
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Rocko on September 22, 2008, 07:00:00 pm
Honestly, I don't see much use for MacOS X. MacOS X is supposedly better for multimedia and Windows is supposedly better for gaming. You can't do hard-core gaming in MacOS X but you can do hard-core video editing and graphics in Windows Vista just as good as you can with MacOS X using Adobe CS3. Also, Encoding any tv or dvd rips is a lot better on Windows Vista than MacOS X or Linux. In reality, you can do just about anything on Windows Vista except for a decent server which is where Linux comes in with MythTv, NAS, and a bunch of other neat server stuff.

PS: MacOS X has issues too, the fact that my laptop won't take MacOS X Leopard and it meets the minimum requirements for it. Apple hardware is pure garbage and I got MacOS X on an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 for around 600 bucks and it outperforms the most expensive iMac.
I went the PC route with my most recent computer purchase for one reason... price. MacBooks are way over priced for what they got, if I'm paying $1300 for a new laptop it better have ATI or Nvida seeing as my $750 HP has Nvidia. And it better have a 400GB HDD, and 4gb of ram, and so much else too.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: RandomDude18 on October 30, 2008, 01:47:23 pm
Nice.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Spongebob4Ever on December 20, 2008, 09:54:56 pm
I think PCs & Windows is better.
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on July 31, 2009, 04:33:08 pm
!!!CAUTION EXTREMIST POINTS OF VIEW AHEAD!!!






Too often I become very extremist in this particular debate so this is just a fair warning before you read.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


I am still shocked that people are defending this left behind OS, including myself at one point.  Most of the time its just common sense when it comes to deciphering which ones better, majority of people who switch to mac, know that its just better.  Its common sense man!

Since I dont know where to start, I will start with some of the Mac myths that people still bring up....

The first one in line is the myth that Mac users are dumb, that there the dummies of the computer world...

Lets have a look at this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGLhuF3L48U


What happened when windows 98 shipped?

We all knew what happened when windows 98 shipped.


Pc's were built by poor hardware manufauers...
(http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/06/28/dell_narrowweb__300x328,0.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPNVM0oHO8g (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPNVM0oHO8g) <<another happy alienware customer.

For smart people...


While Apple hardware was built by geniuses for dummies..

Most of the time, Mac users from what I have seen are too busy doing VFX, commercials, and film to the point where they cannot deal with obstacles of hardware problems, or even issues within the OS.

I guess I can make the arrogant statement, that if you were somewhat smart, you would have left Windows a long time ago, because you'd realize how horrible it really is.

Next up is the saying that mac hardware is overpriced.

Now What one is saying is that If I have a Pc and Mac that are identical, the PC should cost significantly less...




Well lets compare the Mac pro to the Dell precision workstation T5500.

Mac Pro $2,500

Dell $3,486

http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=bw1s14a0&c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04&kc=productdetails~workstation-precision-t5500


Get the idea?

Then with this comes the argument where one manages to find a PC that costs likely a hundred bucks less...and its then where I counter argue the extra costs, the category, plus aesthetics...

Next is Games...

Look pal, macs do game.  You want more games, bootcamp it.

Market share?

just because more people drive hondas doesn't mean the quality is that of a ferrari in terms of interior design, performance etc.

The Argument of user error?

How does the OS handle user error?

If I eject a removable drive while data is being read from it, do I get a "please insert disk" or does the machine lock up and say some cryptic error message that an average user cant decipher.

When a virus attempts to compromise my system folder, does it automaticly do it? or does  a window pop-up requesting me to enter my password out of the blue?



To be continued...




Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 01, 2009, 06:52:02 pm
mac sucks
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: J.R. on August 01, 2009, 06:53:19 pm
...windows into an inescapable vortex of fail.

mac wins.  :P
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 01, 2009, 06:54:13 pm
lulz @ macs being 2000 and still people complain about it when they use it
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: Compwhiz128 on August 03, 2009, 04:34:04 pm
lulz @ macs being 2000 and still people complain about it when they use it

lulz @ 600 mac mini

and lulz @ similar mac pro pc costing $3,486
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on August 05, 2009, 06:48:01 pm
people still complain about macs. Doesn't matter cost or size. They're suppose to be impenetrable or something. <__<
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: katangputz on March 11, 2010, 11:38:40 pm
Generally people looking either like PC or mac depending upon what functions are useful to them. In some aspects PCs are better and in some aspects Macs are better. I personally prefer macs- not ONLY because it looks good but it has a lot more functions than a PC does and it boots up faster AND it hardly ever crashes. Macs are just better at this than PCs. There is a reason Mac sales are growing -- serious computer users appreciate how Macs "just work."
Title: Re: Mac Vs. Pc
Post by: ssj4gogita4 on March 12, 2010, 07:58:47 pm
PCs hardly ever crash if you actually know how to use one. Stupid people crash PCs.