Author Topic: U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000  (Read 16811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lil Loco

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #30 on: October 27, 2005, 04:06:41 pm »
Quote
Quote
ur not even arguing anymore homez...ur jus bashin him now...
[snapback]248877[/snapback]
If I wanted to bash him, I would.
[snapback]248882[/snapback]

ok then...all im seein now iz u talkin smack against him.

Quote
Quote
i dont care whether sumone thinkz bush iz best president since lincoln
[snapback]248873[/snapback]

Let me seay somthing kinda off topic: Lincoln was the worst rebulican ever. He was an embaresment. I'm saying that because of the horrible state the south was in after The Civil War. My 2 cents.
[snapback]248884[/snapback]

alotta southernerz are like that...i personally think he waz cool, but wutever...that dont matter.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2005, 04:06:57 pm by Lil Loco »

Elizabeth Rose

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #31 on: October 27, 2005, 07:26:18 pm »
Quote
Quote
Quote
ur not even arguing anymore homez...ur jus bashin him now...
[snapback]248877[/snapback]
If I wanted to bash him, I would.
[snapback]248882[/snapback]

That's what you're doing.  You quit arguing and started talking about how much he doesn't care.
[snapback]248887[/snapback]
And let me add that he cannt possibly prove that.

Offline Scilla

  • SpongeBob
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,271
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #32 on: October 28, 2005, 05:43:36 am »
Quote
Even suggesting that the president should fight is STUPID.

Sorry Timo, but that is a dumb suggestion.
[snapback]248856[/snapback]

It's not. It really isn't. Think of how the people feel. I haven't experienced it. And I hope I never will have to, but just think. "I am giving my life for something that is stupid, just stupid" Thats my opinion.

Quote
Quote
Quote
thatz about the dumbest question ive heard today...haz there ever been a instance where the president fought in a war while he waz president?
[snapback]248844[/snapback]
You calling me dumb?

Presidents are people to. People who are fighting in the war are people to. Everyone is the same. Let's all fight for what we believe in.
[snapback]248846[/snapback]
Scilla don't be a dumbass.  That isn't how the armed forces work.

Ok, so it is mean to call you a dumbass.  I still think what you said gets an F in the school of Liz.
[snapback]248858[/snapback]
I really don't appreciate being called a dumbass. And I take it very seriously. My opinion is my opinion. Don't call me a dumbass for it.

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
thatz about the dumbest question ive heard today...haz there ever been a instance where the president fought in a war while he waz president?
[snapback]248844[/snapback]
You calling me dumb?

Presidents are people to. People who are fighting in the war are people to. Everyone is the same. Let's all fight for what we believe in.
[snapback]248846[/snapback]
It is a dumb question.  The presidents job is too rule the country, not go to war himself.  If you think Bush should literally be there as a soldier, then yeah, I'd say you don't have as many IQ points as I thought.

Scilla don't be a dumbass.  That isn't how the armed forces work.
[snapback]248858[/snapback]
President doesnt give a crap about us.
[snapback]248860[/snapback]

And that's a reason to send him to war?  No.  Just shut up.  You're not making any sense.
[snapback]248862[/snapback]
NONE of you are making sense. C'mon. I KNOW they won't send him to war. I KNOW THIS. But if he would rather send thousands of men who are probably only 20-something who have yet to live their lives.. he is an evil man. But of course, they decided to do it.


The deathtoll is now at 2007.

Offline Roger

  • SpongeBob
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,532
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #33 on: October 28, 2005, 08:13:36 am »
So...instead of sending people who are young and able-bodied, you'd rather send the old men who can't do anything?   Wow.  That makes sense.

Besides, anyone who doesn't want to go to war shouldn't join the armed forces.  It's a choice, not a requirement.

Chrono

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #34 on: October 28, 2005, 09:06:10 am »
This is stupid. Why the hell did they even start war? It's like a popularity contest, and Bush just wants everybody to know him.

Offline Isnt Anything

  • Honorable
  • SpongeBob
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,109
  • Gender: Female
  • I look at the sounds through filters.
    • View Profile
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #35 on: October 28, 2005, 09:19:23 am »
Everyone is Stupid, ok? They've never sent a president to war (in modern times) and NEVER WILL! So,  why are we having this stupid argument? You are arguing over something that will NEVER HAPPEN anyway. There is no need to call names and insult people, guys. If you cant be mature, dont post in here. If this continues, I'm closing this...

Elizabeth Rose

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #36 on: October 28, 2005, 09:42:47 am »
2007 is still nothing for a war.  In the Napoleonic wars 2000 was the average per battle.  It's war.  It's life.  Cold?  Yes, but that's life.  If my brother is killed over there I will be darn proud of him anyway.  I swear, no one has a sense of honor anymore.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2005, 09:44:43 am by Elizabeth Rose »

Lil Loco

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #37 on: October 28, 2005, 09:50:36 am »
people that dont agree with us bein there obviously are gonna get p1ssed about our casualtiez...even if they are nuthin by comparison of all other warz.  i got family thatz fought and family thatz still there, and im proud of 'em.  and yea im with u all the way liz...but people that dont agree with it will never be convinced that anything iz worth it.  i guess everyonez got their own opinionz...

Elizabeth Rose

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #38 on: October 28, 2005, 09:54:49 am »
Quote
people that dont agree with us bein there obviously are gonna get p1ssed about our casualtiez...even if they are nuthin by comparison of all other warz.  i got family thatz fought and family thatz still there, and im proud of 'em.  and yea im with u all the way liz...but people that dont agree with it will never be convinced that anything iz worth it.  i guess everyonez got their own opinionz...
[snapback]249090[/snapback]
Oh yeah, I know, but I'm hard headed ::DOLPHIN NOISE:: that just cannot keep her mouth shut in areas like this. :mellow:

Lil Loco

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #39 on: October 28, 2005, 09:57:29 am »
hahah, yea...i try to avoid talkin bout stuff like this, cuz i get real serious about it.  ive stayed pretty level here, but yea...politicz can get people goin real quick.

Offline ssj4gogita4

  • Honorable
  • SpongeBob
  • ******
  • Posts: 17,890
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #40 on: October 28, 2005, 10:25:51 am »
Quote
So...instead of sending people who are young and able-bodied, you'd rather send the old men who can't do anything?   Wow.  That makes sense.

Besides, anyone who doesn't want to go to war shouldn't join the armed forces.  It's a choice, not a requirement.
[snapback]249079[/snapback]
Did she say she wanted them to send the old men? No.

I'd rather have no one to send and have this settled some other way that is non-violent. But, of course, that will NEVER happen.

Quote
Everyone is Stupid, ok? They've never sent a president to war (in modern times) and NEVER WILL! So,  why are we having this stupid argument? You are arguing over something that will NEVER HAPPEN anyway. There is no need to call names and insult people, guys. If you cant be mature, dont post in here. If this continues, I'm closing this...
[snapback]249082[/snapback]
We know it will NEVER happen but it would be nice to see it, though.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2005, 10:42:59 am by ssj4gogita4 »

Elizabeth Rose

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #41 on: October 28, 2005, 11:51:19 am »
It would not be nice to see.  President goes to war.  President is killed.  Country is in chaos and a very bad person takes over.  Country is screwed.

It would be an overall bad idea for ANY president to go to war.  It just spells trouble.

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2005, 07:20:44 pm »
First and foremost, thank you Liz, Roger, and Jeremy.

It's not like Bush sent out a draft and forced all of these soldiers to go to war. They joined the army, they made a choice for their lifestyle. Yea, it's sad that there are so many casualties, but those people chose to die for their country. I can bet you that every soldier out there doesn't feel that they're wasting their lives in this war. If there are some out there, they shouldn't blame the president or America, they should blame themselves for joining the army. If the president joined the army, and became one of those casualties, we'd be in some deep ::Dolphin Noise:: wouldn't we?

Lil Loco

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2005, 07:31:55 pm »
kristi...ur awesome.

Atticus Finch

  • Guest
U.S. death toll in Iraq reaches 2,000
« Reply #44 on: October 29, 2005, 07:41:24 pm »
Haha, thanks Jeremy. =)

Quote
2007 is still nothing for a war. In the Napoleonic wars 2000 was the average per battle. It's war. It's life. Cold? Yes, but that's life. If my brother is killed over there I will be darn proud of him anyway. I swear, no one has a sense of honor anymore.

Once again, thank you. How about the millions of Jews that were killed by Hitler? Too bad for them, they didn't get to choose to die for their beliefs or culture. 2000 is a sad amount when describing death, but you've got to think a little more into it than just the number.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2005, 07:48:50 pm by Atticus Finch »