A recent debate turned up in my Media Studies class today, we all had a discussion about violence in video games causing kids to reinact them...you know...a video game involving a weapon...lets say, a knife...they kid after playing it goes into the kitchen and grabs a knife and starts acting like they do in the video game and nearly kills someone.
There have been countless news articles over situations like this, plus many on the situation on 'Video Games Linked To Agression In Teenagers'.
In my personal opinion, kids under the age of 15 shouldn't even be playing on video games with such violence unless they are certainly mature enough.
My parents knew I was mature enough to play on GTA, and they where right.
In fact, I find the video game to be VERY stress-releaving.....especially at this point in my life where the pressures of College and society really begin to mount on my shoulders, blowing up an AI Car takes it all away.
I decided to put this here since it is a debate...even if it's about VG.
Dead on. It is up to the parents, and the kid to be able to prove s/he is mature enough to handle it. I think it is bull when (and this is linking to an actual news story) a car crashed, and they found a copy of Need for Speed Underground 2 at the site, and blamed EA, when it was not Electronic Art's fault. I also think it is bull when
all violent games are linked to things such as a teenager shooting down a school.
SBNet, I have played The Sims 2 for hours on end (try 12 one time, usually no more than 5)...when my parents are away that is
Anyways, I should be doing homework, but logged in real quick to refresh my brain, so I will write more later, but bassically, Sarah is dead on about the maturity issue. I also find stress relief when I play video games.