Author Topic: 300... (Read 11084 times)

Daniel · « **on:** April 02, 2007, 02:53:39 pm »

...Sucks. Seriously. What is up with it. The graphics were laughable, and waaaay too many boobs.

And when that guy who looked like he had Herpes on his face started licking that young girl, I got turned off of Hetero'ism for about 30 minutes...

It was just a lame, bad movie.

Shinya · « **Reply #1 on:** April 02, 2007, 03:03:01 pm »

Wow. So then, everyone in my school that's ever given that movie a chance and LIKED it have horrible taste, huh? That does sound about right though...

Patback399 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 02, 2007, 05:33:32 pm »

Quote from: Daniel on April 02, 2007, 02:53:39 pm

...Sucks. Seriously. What is up with it. The graphics were laughable, and waaaay too many boobs.

And when that guy who looked like he had Herpes on his face started licking that young girl, I got turned off of Hetero'ism for about 30 minutes...

It was just a lame, bad movie.

Dude...

I haven't seen the movie, but... the hoi polloi seem to contradict you.

Lil Loco · « **Reply #3 on:** April 02, 2007, 05:43:30 pm »

Pssh. 300 was awesome, you're crazy.

Daniel · « **Reply #4 on:** April 02, 2007, 06:40:03 pm »

You guys are crazy. It sucked.

It is more over rated than Star Wars.

Really. It was homosexual. Especially those 2 black chicks that were making out.

And also, WTF. Persians were NOT black. And Xerxes didn't run around in a speedo.

VulturEMaN · « **Reply #5 on:** April 02, 2007, 07:02:46 pm »

it was excellent. take a nap daniel.

Lil Loco · « **Reply #6 on:** April 02, 2007, 07:19:34 pm »

The Persian Empire accumulated people from many countries, African included. And while they didn't really get Xerxes right, it's still an awesome movie. You can say it sucked but me and and tens of millions of other people say otherwise.

Elizabeth Rose · « **Reply #7 on:** April 02, 2007, 08:55:31 pm »

I just thought it was overrated. I mean, the graphics were lacking and the storyline kinda dragged for me. It just didn't seem realistic at all. I am not a fan of taking a real history and making it a fantasy though, so maybe that was the problem. The worst part though was this family sitting in the cinema playing with their cell phones. I told the girl in front of to shut her phone before I got really pissed off, but the dad kept talking throughout.

I just couldn't get with this film though. My mom actually knows the chick who played the queen, so she told me to keep an eye on her. I now know my mom's friend has really tiny tits.

Lil Loco · « **Reply #8 on:** April 02, 2007, 09:11:31 pm »

Lacking graphics? I didn't notice any lack of graphic quality. And aside from Xerxes' appearance, the rhino, making Ephialtes deformed, and maybe making the Spartans being a lil bit buffer than they probly were at the battle of Thermopylae, they pretty much followed Herodotus's accounts of the battle. And they made that movie with a meager budget too, so that's more kudos for them. I mean if you didn't like the movie then oh well...I still love it hahah.

Scilla · « **Reply #9 on:** April 02, 2007, 10:37:28 pm »

haven't seen it.
i have no desire to see it
too many people have ruined it for me

THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!!!

VulturEMaN · « **Reply #10 on:** April 03, 2007, 05:51:01 am »

THIS IS CAKETOWN!!!!!!!

spongey snail · « **Reply #11 on:** April 03, 2007, 02:24:09 pm »

is 300 more gory than gladiator?

Lil Loco · « **Reply #12 on:** April 03, 2007, 02:29:37 pm »

They're comparable. I think Gladiator might have a lil bit more but only by a slim margin.

Patback399 · « **Reply #13 on:** April 03, 2007, 03:57:53 pm »

Quote from: Lil Loco on April 02, 2007, 09:11:31 pm

Lacking graphics? I didn't notice any lack of graphic quality. And aside from Xerxes' appearance, the rhino, making Ephialtes deformed, and maybe making the Spartans being a lil bit buffer than they probly were at the battle of Thermopylae, they pretty much followed Herodotus's accounts of the battle. And they made that movie with a meager budget too, so that's more kudos for them. I mean if you didn't like the movie then oh well...I still love it hahah.

Have you read The Histories?

Elizabeth Rose · « **Reply #14 on:** April 04, 2007, 11:11:07 am »

Quote from: Lil Loco on April 02, 2007, 09:11:31 pm

Lacking graphics? I didn't notice any lack of graphic quality. And aside from Xerxes' appearance, the rhino, making Ephialtes deformed, and maybe making the Spartans being a lil bit buffer than they probly were at the battle of Thermopylae, they pretty much followed Herodotus's accounts of the battle. And they made that movie with a meager budget too, so that's more kudos for them. I mean if you didn't like the movie then oh well...I still love it hahah.

It just didn't seem believable to me AT ALL. Count on me to be the oddball though.

Patback399 · « **Reply #15 on:** April 04, 2007, 11:43:29 am »

Another great part that was (I think) left out of the movie was how the Persians got to Thermopylae. They put old boats side by side for a makeshift bridge!

Daniel · « **Reply #16 on:** April 04, 2007, 12:43:19 pm »

They f'd up History.
All the chicks were almost flat.
The Graphics were...
...Lame.
The movie was freaking racist.
Xerxes was not black.

Patback399 · « **Reply #17 on:** April 04, 2007, 02:18:38 pm »

Quote from: Daniel on April 04, 2007, 12:43:19 pm

They f'd up History.
All the chicks were almost flat.
The Graphics were...
...Lame.
The movie was freaking racist.
Xerxes was not black.

1. If you really cared about the size of the assets in a movie, I know a good genre for you.

2. Xerxes was dark-skinned. And how is that racist?

IZ · « **Reply #18 on:** April 04, 2007, 04:40:57 pm »

Quote from: Patback399 on April 04, 2007, 02:18:38 pm

Quote from: Daniel on April 04, 2007, 12:43:19 pm
They f'd up History.
All the chicks were almost flat.
The Graphics were...
...Lame.
The movie was freaking racist.
Xerxes was not black.

1. If you really cared about the size of the assets in a movie, I know a good genre for you.

I love you.

Lil Loco · « **Reply #19 on:** April 04, 2007, 04:52:11 pm »

Quote from: Patback399 on April 03, 2007, 03:57:53 pm

Quote from: Lil Loco on April 02, 2007, 09:11:31 pm
Lacking graphics? I didn't notice any lack of graphic quality. And aside from Xerxes' appearance, the rhino, making Ephialtes deformed, and maybe making the Spartans being a lil bit buffer than they probly were at the battle of Thermopylae, they pretty much followed Herodotus's accounts of the battle. And they made that movie with a meager budget too, so that's more kudos for them. I mean if you didn't like the movie then oh well...I still love it hahah.

Have you read The Histories?

Except for Calliope. But now that you mention it, I think I'm gonna go read the final part.

Daniel · « **Reply #20 on:** April 04, 2007, 05:13:21 pm »

All the bad people were black...

And they weren't in a gang. Everyone knows that the only bad black people there are are in gangs. =p

And I don't care about their breast size very much. But theirs were boarderline non existent. It was almost like they were entirely flat.

If you are going to show something, do it right. =p

Lil Loco · « **Reply #21 on:** April 04, 2007, 05:20:28 pm »

Lol no, not all of the "bad guys" were black. The vast majority were dark-skinned, as the Persians were a darker-skinned people. As far as nudity goes, there was only a couple women shown and one of them was a younger woman so what do you expect? The nudity that was shown wasn't meant to be a focal movie of the movie anyways. You want breasts, go watch titi-porn, 300 is about Thermopylae not breasteses.

Daniel · « **Reply #22 on:** April 04, 2007, 08:54:04 pm »

I didn't mean it that way...

What I meant is they might as well have not shown anything.

It would have been better that way...

Elizabeth Rose · « **Reply #23 on:** April 05, 2007, 09:32:45 am »

Lolz Danny.

News:

Author Topic: 300... (Read 11084 times)

Patback399

Lil Loco

Lil Loco

Elizabeth Rose

Lil Loco

spongey snail

Lil Loco

Patback399

Elizabeth Rose

Patback399

Patback399

Lil Loco

Lil Loco

Elizabeth Rose