8
« on: June 29, 2008, 10:40:32 am »
I've been thinking, and honestly, the death penalty is now being turned around into a "cruel and unsual" punishment. If you went about and murdered someone, why should you get the grace of life? I find it hypocrytic that our country fights for people who abuse animals to go to jail and pay huge amounts of fines, yet we do testing on animals? Why not do tests on convicted murderers or serial killers? Why should innocent lives suffer, and be killed, while these prisoners sit and rot in their cells, and are completely good for nothing? I think we should do testing on them. Why do I think this? After they killed someone, and ruined many lives, they get away without any pain? Get fed every day, sleep , shower, watch tv, and play cards with their buddies? Sure it may not be a "glamorous" lifestyle, but it's better than they should get! What do you think about doing testing of products/lotions/sprays on convicts who have life in prison, or have the death penalty? I personally think it would be a good idea. Not because I fancy torturing people, but why harm innocent animals who have done nothing? I've always heard "An eye for an eye", and I think this should be applied. My argument?
Defense attorney: Testing my client is cruel and unusal
Prosecuter: Was murdering an innocent life cruel and unusal?
Honestly, think about it. What are your opinions?