Pardon? Are you purposefully trying to anger me? You conservatives HAVE used Kerry's past against him. For instance, his being in the war and all. Like I really remember what all has been said, but they use it against him. How he never truly fought or something. I think, if you are going to attack me, take your time and realize what it is I'm trying to say.
Allow me to clarify what I have said so far, as you seem incapable of understanding anything unless I rephrase it two to three times. His "being in war and all"? Is that even a statement? I think I have some idea as to what you mean, and I'll assume you're asking me about the relevance of his war history. He calls on that to demonstrate why he is a legitimate presidential candidate. He claims to be a war hero and, therefore, he himself has brought us to Vietnam.
Conservatives didn't even know who this guy was until last year when he started making a fool out of himself, touting his silver star and purple hearts. We haven't brought up his past, he did. And we, for that matter, aren't even the ones who dug into his history! It was the SWIFT BOAT VETERANS who did that for us. You'd be surprised at how easy it is to win when you are actually right.
I think the problem here is not that I can't figure out what you're trying to say but that I do understand all-too-well where you're coming from and where you're going. The past has not been used against Kerry in any way that is not relevant to this election today. This man has NOT changed. This man is the same man who protested the war and encouraged our enemy in Vietnam. This is the same man who demonstrated by ALL ACCOUNTS cowardly behavior in war and this is the same man who is indeed a war hero... For our enemies, and as such they have erected a statue to him.
Do you really know all that you think you know? Are you really as well-informed, wise and correct as you think that you are? Or would you even dare to question it?